Lufthansa Paid 500 ...
 

Lufthansa Paid 500 Million Euros In Compensation In 2018

38 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
240 Views
Posts: 40042
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#8963]
wpf-cross-image

Europe has some of the strictest regulations when it comes to compensation that airlines are required to pay in the event of delays or cancelations. This policy is known as EU261, and with this airlines are required to pay either 250EUR, 400EUR, or 600EUR in cash compensation in the event of a significant flight delay.…

Continue reading: Wow: Lufthansa Paid 500 Million Euros In Compensation In 2018

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


37 Replies
37 Replies
(@Michael)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 18

Could include duty of care payments as well (though strictly not considered compensation) as well as other non-EC261 related compensation payments? Your method of averaging is very thumb-sucky and good chance it's way off


Reply
(@Cristoffer Cedergren)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 140

Its not the EU261-money. Its includes hotels, rebooking on other airlines, compensation for passengers cost...etc.


Reply
Gold
(@dennis-r)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Yep, we got some of it this past year. Well, they should be more on time then! Plus sort out FRA (which was the main cause of our delay).


Reply
(@Malati)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 21

Yes, got technical on DEL-MUC, one day delay, full compensation paid without any trouble.


Reply
Gold
(@dennis-r)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

And those horrible American carriers saying there should be a level playing field. Ok then, introduce this then into the US to motivate those garbage airlines to start caring about customers! Then instead of making hundreds of millions in profit they would make a loss instead. But then the US government is too weak to introduce such thing. It's all about money there - much more important than people.


Reply
Diamond
(@the-nice-paul)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

It’s not just the cash payments, but includes hotels, making alternative travel arrangements, etc.

Even so, the whole point of EU261 is that the legislators do *not* want any airline to have to make payments. It’s supposed to incentivise airlines to do their jobs properly, so the compensation was set at a level that was deliberately intended to hurt an airline if they kept screwing-over their passengers. The idea was that the threat of big losses seemed to be the only way to get the airlines to sort themselves out.

I have zero pity for Lufthansa - or any other airline paying out massive compensation.


Reply
 Sam
(@Sam)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 520

Lucky, you seem to forget the main factor that lead to this amount of compensation - Lufthansa has had major delays due to the integration of Air Berlin's planes into Eurowings for the last 2yrs.
Remember LH had already signed on to lease 38 AB planes before the airline went burst.

There was a shortage of pilots and then the strikes (and shortage) of air traffic controllers causing many flights to be delayed last summer.

On two different occasions i had my dometic LH flights from MUC cancelled and was rerouted via FRA. I claimed EU261 on both occasions.

That figure could have been much higher if all affected passengers had claimed the compensation. The figure is not just for LH itself but for the whole Lufthansa group which carried 142Million Pax in 2018.


Reply
(@fbruno)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

A part of this will also be (EU261) compensations for misconnects. Even a very small delay can lead to a misconnect given the very short MCT in Frankfurt.


Reply
 Joey
Diamond
(@joey-4)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1215

I am surprised --- but I'm also curious how much LH (and other airlines) profit from change/ancillary fees from passengers each year and whether it surpasses the 500 million number.


Reply
 23H
(@23H)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 64

I'm also curious if this is an amount for Lufthansa proper, or all of the brands that Lufthansa owns (including Brussels Airlines, SWISS and Austrian, Eurowings). Including them would likely raise the amount fairly significantly.


Reply
 SQT
(@SQT)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 12

It's priced in to all passengers. Lufthansa paid for it but from passengers' pockets.


Reply
(@Christian)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 846

Given Lufthansa’s notorious reluctance to pay EC261, you have to wonder how much would have been paid out if they had followed the rules properly.


Reply
(@jfhscott)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

As SQT said:

"It’s priced in to all passengers. Lufthansa paid for it but from passengers’ pockets."

I'd be interested to know how many tickets got sold to ascertain how much each passenger paid to provide the EU's generous passenger compensation rules.


Reply
(@Unterwegs)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 10

I wish there was a similar regulation in the US. It would force the airlines to become better - or go out of business because of the compensation payments.


Reply
 As
(@As)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 108

@sqt

Good thing they operate in an extremely competitive aviation environment then. They can’t bake penalty fees into tickets without pricing themselves out of customers.


Reply
(@ChrisC)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 457

Debit - none as baggage isn’t part of EU261.


Reply
(@dylan)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@jfhscott... if they carried 141M passengers and paid out €500M, then it was about €3.5 per passenger.


Reply
(@ChrisC)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 457

The purpose of EU261 wasn’t to punish airlines but to stop them just cancelling flights - especially for commercial reasons such as light loads - at the last minute and leaving passengers stranded without recompense or care. They could still do that but there would be a cost to them in compensating passengers which would change the economics of the cancellation.

It should also be noted that the wording of the regulation did not allow for compensation for delayed flights only cancelled flights and it was the courts that expanded it to include delays and so vastly increasing the costs to the airlines.

It is the same courts that have also gradually whittled away at the definition of extraordinary circumstances that have also increased the compensation payouts.

EU261 did include duty of care for delays - meals etc after specific lengths of times depending on the length of the flight.


Reply
 joe
(@joe)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 3
(@cedric-pinsonnault)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Of 100+ flights on the LH group I’ve had one bagage delay and it really was my fault...so I don’t think luggage is an issue.


Reply
 MAKP
(@MAKP)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

@ChrisC Article 6 headline DELAY, if in doubt:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32004R0261&from=DA

And extraordinary circunstances is ofcourse NOT just bad weather, Airlines tries that loophole to avoid paying compensations, bad weather is:

“Bad weather must be ‘freak’ or ‘wholly exceptional‘“


Reply
 makp
(@makp)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ChrisC EEC No 295/91 4 February 1991, did only regulate cancellation.


Reply
 Matt
(@Matt)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 22

It's a lot of money, but LH Group is also the largest carrier in Europe and still profitable. It's not surprising, and likely the figure includes other non-direct monetary compensation (meals, hotels, etc...). Their main hubs in Europe don't all have a lot of low cost competition so I'm sure they more than make up for the EU 261 compensation.

I don't feel bad for them at all.


Reply
(@ChrisC)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 457

MAKP read EU261/2005 - the current regulation - and you’ll see there is no compensation for delay.


Reply
Gold
(@notbad41)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 54

They just pass it on other tickets. What is the average per ticket? $1-3?


Reply
(@Otavio)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 49

Got a delay of 5 hours on my flight Rome-Rio de Janeiro two days ago and Alitalia only got water and a "panini". As they treated everyone in a rude way giving a @#$@ to everyone should I ask for compensation? They say the dalay was caused due to a storm in Milan where our aircraft was coming in.


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 251

So what? Effectively European flyers pay their own compensation as naturally any EU airline would bake that into their fares. It´s a zero sum game.


Reply
 DNN
(@DNN)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 70

So my guess with this one is Lufthansa is possibly making money hand over fist, and has more than enough to give you and still have change left in their pocket?!


Reply
(@Marco)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Actually the regulation applies to ANY carrier departing or landing in the EU. Two years ago I got United to pay 800 Euros for me and companion en route from EU to San Diego as they were late arriving at the connecting airport and caused a lost connection... Obviously they denied I had the right to request it, but a simple well drafted letter sent by certified mail made the trick.


Reply
 makp
(@makp)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ChrisC I dont know why you think delay is not included.

Article 6

Delay

1. When an operating air carrier reasonably expects a flight to be delayed beyond its scheduled time of departure:

(a) for two hours or more in the case of flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or

(b) for three hours or more in the case of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and of all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or

(c) for four hours or more in the case of all flights not falling under (a) or (b),

passengers shall be offered by the operating air carrier:

(i) the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2); and

(ii) when the reasonably expected time of departure is at least the day after the time of departure previously announced, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c); and

(iii) when the delay is at least five hours, the assistance specified in Article 8(1)(a).

2. In any event, the assistance shall be offered within the time limits set out above with respect to each distance bracket.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32004R0261&from=DA


Reply
 makp
(@makp)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ChrisC Perhaps you should read it?:

Article 6

Delay

1. When an operating air carrier reasonably expects a flight to be delayed beyond its scheduled time of departure:

(a) for two hours or more in the case of flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or

(b) for three hours or more in the case of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and of all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or

(c) for four hours or more in the case of all flights not falling under (a) or (b),

passengers shall be offered by the operating air carrier:

(i) the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2); and

(ii) when the reasonably expected time of departure is at least the day after the time of departure previously announced, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c); and

(iii) when the delay is at least five hours, the assistance specified in Article 8(1)(a).

2. In any event, the assistance shall be offered within the time limits set out above with respect to each distance bracket.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32004R0261&from=DA


Reply
 makp
(@makp)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ChrisC
The old legislation didnt hat delay, the new EU 261 has:

Article 6

Delay

1. When an operating air carrier reasonably expects a flight to be delayed beyond its scheduled time of departure:

(a) for two hours or more in the case of flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or

(b) for three hours or more in the case of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and of all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or

(c) for four hours or more in the case of all flights not falling under (a) or (b),

passengers shall be offered by the operating air carrier:

(i) the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2); and

(ii) when the reasonably expected time of departure is at least the day after the time of departure previously announced, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c); and

(iii) when the delay is at least five hours, the assistance specified in Article 8(1)(a).

2. In any event, the assistance shall be offered within the time limits set out above with respect to each distance bracket.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32004R0261&from=DA


Reply
(@juan-c)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

5star airline..


Reply
(@Ian G)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 2

Lucky - I would be really interested to know the statistics behind delays in European flights. I think there is a big increase in “short” delays as European carriers will do everything to avoid a compensation payout delay i.e. better to have 5 flights delay for 3 hours rather than 4 on time and 1 delay 4 hours..... I certainly have been on multiple flights where they have opened the doors just in time to avoid compensation....


Reply
(@Jackson)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 5

I suspect that EU261 compensation is only a small part of the compensation listed here. Most of it probably goes to hotels, meals and rebooking.

These compensation schemes are a good incentive for airliners to operate planes on time.


Reply
 alex
(@alex)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

since 2018, EU airlines are systematically rejecting all compensation claims arguing extraordinary circumstances. you need to take them to court or arbitrage, which people do.


Reply
 Abhi
(@Abhi)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 1

Real question is that why airlines don’t provide/deploy similar tracking tech by themselves to locate missing bags


Reply