Capacity is up 9% -- while load factors are down three percentage points and total revenue is down 1%.
That tells me they are over expanding. They have way more capacity than they did a year ago but they couldn't fill as many seats on each flight -- and they had to heavily discount the seats they did fill, so even with a huge expansion in capacity and correspondingly higher operating costs, they got no incremental revenue. In fact revenue actually went down a bit.
I know there is some room for revenue to go down at airlines given how low fuel prices are -- but plummeting load factors with massive capacity expansion is not healthy. And the fact that they just make excuses for themselves, blaming currency, is not a good sign either. What they're really saying is they were planning for explosive growth -- but that didn't materialize.
Emirates will probably be fine since the government will just quietly "loan" then more money (I.e., bail them out). But from a financial perspective these are not numbers you would see at a healthy, well-run airline. Looks like a typical state-run, inefficient operation frittering away money in the speculative hope that massive spending will eventually lead to revenue growth.
I agree with Lucky that the U.S. government should not intervene, but I can see why U.S. airlines are pissed about irresponsible competitors like this. No one can make money if a few airlines are willing to spend like crazy because a bail out is always just a phone call away.