Cathay Pacific Now ...
 

Cathay Pacific Now Selling Access To Some Of Its Lounges

22 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
246 Views
Posts: 0
Diamond
Topic starter
(@james)
Member
Joined: 8 years ago
[#8403]
wpf-cross-image

To increase ancillary revenue, some airlines have begun selling lounge access to passengers without status, traveling in economy or premium economy, who would not have otherwise had access, including: -- Emirates selling access to their business class lounge in Dubai for USD$100 per person, and access to their first class lounge for $200 -- Lufthansa…

Continue reading: Cathay Pacific Now Selling Access To Some Of Its Lounges

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


21 Replies
21 Replies
(@airjus)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I think there's a typo with the prices. You listed the entry price as HKD 600/75 USD in the beginning and then switched to 50 USD afterwards.


Reply
 P
(@P)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 26

Given what the US airlines charge ($59) for the basic lounges, I think $75 is well justified for the CX lounges.


Reply
(@Sergey)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 13

NAIA T1 is better, as I recall, at least lounges were less pathetic than those at T3. T3 is basically a low-cost terminal, most of its traffic are Cebu Pacific and AirAsia. I wonder why at all Cathay Pacific depart from there. T2 is for Philippine Airlines, and its lounge (dedicated for PAL and accessible with Etihad elite status) is way better than any contract lounge in T1 or T3. Never been to Cathay lounge there, so can't compare.


Reply
 chub
(@chub)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 161

ANA sells lounge access for ~$40/ea to economy passengers, which I find it worth paying since they have a hot buffet, sushi chef and ramen bar. I wonder which airline will do it for less than them.


Reply
(@Samuelo)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 13

CX lounges are rubbish in HK as well. What’s so great about CX lounges? As a Diamond member I've stopped going to The Wing and only visit the Pier as there is nothing near the gates on that side of the terminal.

10 years ago when The Wing was run by The Peninsula and CX was doing better The Wing was an awesome lounge. CX lounges now are poorly maintained with rubbish wine and mediocre champagne and food.

I wouldn’t pay $75 to visit the lounges in HK let alone the outstation lounges that they are currently selling access to. If you have $75 to spend at HKIA go to the Plaza Premium First Class lounge or Beef n Liberty and don’t waste your money at a CX lounge.


Reply
(@Robert)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 45

@james, wdym by the payment goes missing???


Reply
(@Endre)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 84

Have to laugh at Samuelo mentioning Plaza Premium lounge.
Stop complaining and travel in First as I do (without points) if you want proper Champagne. CX still has some of the best lounges in the world like it or not.


Reply
Diamond
(@kerry)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 405

@Samuelo,

Are you just trying to be contrarian? I accept they have downgraded the wine and champagne offerings in the first class lounges recently which is disappointing, but come on. Off the top of my head can’t think of many other first class lounges whose design and services are better than the Pier first class in HK, and even in the Wing the cabanas with bathtubs remain among the best facilities for passengers in any airline lounge.

What would you suggest as a better standard for CX to emulate at their home base?


Reply
 yyc
(@yyc)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

People are confusing the three main terminals in NAIA. T1 is the decrepit hunk of concrete built during the Marcos era. Up until the later part of 90's it was the only main international terminal. T2, also called Centennial Terminal solely serves PR, the country's flag carrier. T3 is the most recent which serves a handful of international carriers including CX. It's connected to Newport City (mall) so it's not a bad terminal if you have a long layover. Of the three, the worst is T1 - people should avoid it at all cost. There are no link between terminals except buses on the airside or taxi. Transferring between terminals can be a PITA even for locals.


Reply
 Bob
(@Bob)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 255

Let me fix your post for you:

*Fortunately the excellent lounges in Hong Kong are not included.

Let's keep those lounges exclusively for those who are qualified to use them, please.


Reply
(@Oranjemakker)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 15

OMG the CX lounge in Melbourne is horrible! Wouldn't even pay 420 for that place.


Reply
(@Oranjemakker)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 15

Whoops that should read $20!


Reply
(@Samuelo)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 13

@Kerry, some lounges CX could emulate: BA Concorde Room (better food than any CX lounges, same champagne as they serve in First, ability to book spa appointments in advance, at least for First Class passengers), Etihad First Class lounge in AD (before they started to cut costs), Qantas First Class lounge Sydney. Even the AA Flagship Lounges these days have better wine and food.

As for the Wing, it’s literally falling apart. The seats have ripped upholstery. The restaurant has a long queue every morning so breakfast before your flight is impossible. The cabanas I agree are awesome but as someone who lives in HK I don’t want to go to the airport to take a bath before my flight.

The design of the Pier is nice but food mediocre and forget about ever getting a spa appointment unless you have 10 hours to spare in the lounge. How difficult would it be to allow F passengers to schedule in advance?

CX F lounges in HK are OWE lounges, they don’t in my opinion really have a First Class lounge for F passengers.


Reply
(@mattux)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The CX lounge in Manila is the best lounge by a large margin out of Manila. Granted there is not a lot of competition for excellence there as even Philippine Airlines’ home station lounge is pretty pathetic.

Given the lounge typically only services one flight at a time, rarely does it fill up beyond half capacity.


Reply
Diamond
(@glenn-t)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1195

Not sure if the CX Arrivals lounge at HKG is on the list of pay-to-enter (judging by the passengers I saw I would say it if s), but by most standards I would say give it a big miss! I was given a free invite, coming off a F CX flight, but entered and turned around almost immediately. It is dreadful, unless you've come off a particularly rough flight in Y, I suppose.


Reply
(@idp5601)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 22

@yyc I haven't been to MNL T1 lately, but a lot of the people I know who have tell me it is the best terminal right now - T2 is too small and poorly maintained for PR's growing fleet and T3 is starting to show signs of strain.


Reply
(@fraser of lovat)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

YYC and Matux are spot on. avoid T1 if possible.the pay lounges that the airlines use are rubbish. T2 is better than before but not much. T3 much better.tried cx and sing- sing not bad but cx better. T 3 was a low cost carrier place but was refurbished and premium airlines moved in. Lots of hassles originally with German builder- the roof partially collapsed! Now it’s th.e best- well up to International Standard.


Reply
(@Morgan)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 276

It costs $100 USD to become a Marco Polo club member anyway


Reply
(@Sergey)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 13

@fraser of lovat "well up to International Standard"

That's a joke. There are two contract lounges there and both are pathetic. Not kind of Hong Kong Plaza Premium pathetic, but really bad. Seating in Pacific Club is okay, but food is almost absent. Sky View is even worse, with continuously dropping wifi and impolite staff.

T1 has two contract lounges and those are substantially better than those at T3.

T1 and T2 also have proper transportation options, why T3 has nothing at all. The only advantage of T3 is access to the casino area, in a case you gamble or stay at a hotel in New Port area.


Reply
(@SadBAFlyer)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

@Samuelo: I'd posit that you've never actually been to the CCR if you're using that as a litmus test for CX's The Pier. Food at CCR is decent-to-good, yes. If anything The Wing/Pier is on par or better than CCR for food. Champagne/Wine selection is up to the individual, too, but most folks use price point as a determining factor of "good" champagne/wine which is not a great way to classify. Any sommelier can tell you that, and especially true if you're doing a tasting at altitude. There are heaps of FT threads talking about how it's nearly impossible to book a spa appointment at CCR; I've gotten 1 appointment out of 7 flights/attempts in the last several months. And if you are able to make one, they're provided in that awful, hospital-emergency-room-looking Elemis Spa area between the Galleries Lounge(s) and the CCR. Hardly a spa environment. And that goes double for their showers and the cabanas which could easily double as the bathroom in a mobile home, except most mobile home showers are much nicer. CX's shower suites, to include the overly-warm Arrivals Lounge, are light-years ahead of what's on offer at CCR. The list could go on, but I think the point is fairly clear that you should probably visit the CCR in-person before you compare it to anything CX offers at HKG.


Reply
 Nick
(@Nick)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 50

@glenn CX Arrivals lounge is not on the pay to enter list, and its attraction is that it has showers, which are extremely useful for early morning arrivals. Otherwise I agree it is not much of a lounge.

Melbourne is my home airport and I have to agree the CX lounge is a bit crummy. It does serve some nice dim sum, it has showers and it calls CX flights, so I use it for those things. Otherwise, you're better off in the QF, Plaza Premium or Amex lounges - or upstairs at Bar Pulpo with a Priority Pass. And for A$100, there won't be too many takers.


Reply