Primera Air Is Adding Flights Between Washington & London

Give me $200 RT. I will then torture myself.

Interesting - so far I don't think there's any of the new longhaul-ULCC services connecting the DC region to London, although there's connections available on Icelandair and WOW out of both Dulles and BWI, and some cheap connections from time to time on Aer Lingus out of Dulles (or by taking JetBlue to JFK/BOS and connecting to Aer Lingus.)

Could be enough market stimulation to support the service, especially since there are decent train links to both London and Birmingham New Street.

$199 each way doesn't seem particularly cheap...

I did FRA-AMS-JFK 15 years ago for $430 on KL and FRA-JFK nonstop on SQ for $499. Both deals still exist to this day if you're somewhat flexible. Seems like a no-brainer to me. Give me a SQ flight (even in Y) over a ULCC.

Same goes for the premium deals. Seems to me that a premium economy deal may be significantly cheaper than Primera Air. Heck, even J may be similarly priced on other carriers if you score tickets during a sale...

I had a terrible experience flying Primera a little over a year ago from Dubrovnik to Stockholm. Flight was delay 6 hours with no communication, no customer service contact, and no alerts to let us know why or that our flight was delayed for so long. Awful experience and can't believe they're expanding to transcontinental routes. I'll pass.

My experience: http://flymiler.boardingarea.com/2016/12/never-fly-airline-youve-probably-never-heard/

Prices don't make any sense at all, London to east coast is pretty easy to get for £399 pretty much any time outside the summer on BA/American/Virgin, even less to Boston and with that you're gonna be getting checked luggage, seat selection, flying from Heathrow, potential to earn miles, several flights per day if something goes wrong.

The only potential use for these flights would be if they would let you book one way without penalty then you could maybe use them in conjunction with a redemption if you don't have the miles for a return. Even then, Norwegian seem to be cheaper and have a better reputation and you'll be on a 787 on the London routes

This is interesting and makes me wonder how long it will be before we *could* have something like this from DCA, considering DCA can support the a321. There is a customs facility for Air Canada flights, but I'm pretty sure it would need congressional approval amongst other things. Despite all the reasons against it (including DCA at near max capacity), it is still cool to think of DCA to Europe...and then I remember it's on a single isle and then...not so much!

@Potato, you are not comparing apples to oranges as airport taxes in the U.K. are much higher than the rest of Europe. At $199 one way, or $398 round trip, I suspect the airline makes minimal if any. Case in point, VS US-UK awards incur a surcharge of taxes and fees of $400 alone. If this tells you anything.

@Richard, there is no customs facility at DCA. All flights from YYZ, YUL and YOW clear customs in Canada and are treated like domestic flights. I fly AC from YYZ to DCA numerous of times a year. There are no plans to open one either so the only European flights that would work are to/from SNN and DUB.

@Bill thanks for that clarification! Didn't know there were those facilities in Canada...

They’ve already canned BHX-BOS and pared back other schedules.
Call me a cynic, but at those prices, for a new ETOPS operator with a brand new aircraft type, I’ll pay a few bucks more and go legacy.

Also, Primera charges a 12 dollar fee to book using a credit card. No thanks!

doesn't sound like much fun. Are those flight times much longer than other airlines?

I'd probably look for an Aer Lingus discount flight. Lots of cheap-ish ($2K+) business class fares on Aer Lingus to places all over Europe

@ Lumma

For many, Stansted is an easier airport to use than Heathrow. East Anglia has a population of over 5 million; for them, using Stansted means avoiding transit through London to get to LHR.

Unlike LHR, Stansted also has decent rail links away from London - direct and fast to Cambridge and Norwich, of course, and then stations to the East Midlands cities.

It’s always going to be a niche market; but we’re talking about a niche airline servicing it.

Dear @Potato,

"I did FRA-AMS-JFK 15 years ago for $430 on KL and FRA-JFK nonstop on SQ for $499. Both deals still exist to this day if you’re somewhat flexible. Seems like a no-brainer to me. Give me a SQ flight (even in Y) over a ULCC."

That was 15 years ago. After 33.2% inflation since 2003 this gives you today's dollar value of $573 and $665 respectively. Not that cheap.

@Bill: Not really. There's tickets on OS, BA, VS, AF, and others departing London within the next four weeks that are roughly 420$ to 500$. A 398$ return on a ULCC is by all means not a bargain.

@CS: Again. Both offers exist to this day (for the same price). Would you really fly Primera something rather than a legacy carrier economy?

I wouldn't fly "Primera" regardless 😉

I don't get the ULCC crazy for long-haul. Couldn't possibly imagine anything more uncomfortable in the air.

There definitely big savings to be had on the Boston route but on the Newark and Toronto routes there is only a marginal difference between Primera and the established carriers.

Ultimately, I think whether or not you fly with them will come to down scheduling and whether or not you need extras. In any case, the more competition the better.

@Potato, that’s news to me. A google flight search from DC (including BWI) nonstop only to all airports in London shows the cheapest being $834 to schedule end. The reverse, from London to DC again nonstop only as you need to compare apples to apples shows the cheapest being $638. Not sure where you get your information from.

While I agree flying an ULCC is far from ideal and most would rather pay more to fly a legacy carrier for more value, you can’t argue $400 round trip from DC to London isn’t cheap.

@Potato, last that I checked OS and AF do not offer nonstop services to/from London from DC and vice versa. Again you are not comparing apples to apples.

@the nice Paul

If we're saying that Stansted is better for a lot of the country rather than just those who live in London, there's a far better placed airport, Birmingham, which they've just cancelled the Boston route on.

Agree with The nice Paul.

I live in Suffolk for 6 months of the year and getting to LHR is a pain. AA had a non-stop some years back and I flew it to the States numerous times. That was in business though. Not sure the PE on Primera would coax me away from BA. Yes, even BA.

From STN. There's no edit option.

@ Lumma

BHX is “better placed” than STN for who? Not for the people I mentioned - Norwich and Cambridge, pretty much anyone in Norfolk (0.9m) or Suffolk (0.7m) or Essex (1.4m).

I’d anyway suggest it’s generally better for people to have more options rather than fewer. Both, rather than one.

Cambridge is not huge (120,000) but it’s the UK’s high technology centre generating lots of business traffic. You seriously think those people would find it more convenient to travel via BHX than STN? Primera is not a premium airline - but, as BA’s high profitability shows, convenience is much more important to most pax than the quality of the amenity kit.