American Los Angele...
 

American Los Angeles To Tokyo Haneda Flight Announced

18 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
108 Views
Posts: 39682
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#3778]
wpf-cross-image

American has just announced that they will launch daily Boeing 787-8 flights between Los Angeles and Tokyo Haneda as of February 11, 2016. The new flight will become bookable this Sunday, November 8, 2015. At the beginning of the year I wrote about the battle going on between Delta, American, and Hawaiian, over a slot…

Continue reading: American Los Angeles To Tokyo Haneda Flight Announced

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


17 Replies
17 Replies
 Keau
(@Keau)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 1

The DOT should have awarded Hawaiian the slot. It makes the most sense with timing due to the relatively short flight time to the islands (compared to the mainland US). I blame the conspiracy of prioritizing business over leisure.


Reply
 Nick
(@nick)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 0

Ben, are you kidding? Couldn't disagree with you more re: Haneda.

The airport is very close to the center of Tokyo, and the new freeway tunnel makes it possible to get from Shinjuku to Haneda -- especially at off-peak times -- in 15 minutes or so. Cabs aren't cheap, but they compare to a cab from LAX to West Hollywood -- around $50 or so. The public transportation and Airport Limousine options are very reasonably priced.

The airport's international terminal is really gorgeous -- a very, very pleasant place to fly in and out of.

As for the flight times, I feel like they're only universally regarded as awful in this community. Flying out of LA, you get a full work day and you leave at 6 (on AA) or 6:40 (on DL), landing the next night in time for a full night's sleep. Flying out of Tokyo, you get a full day in Tokyo without springing for an (expensive) hotel, and you land in the early evening in LA, which is perfect. Admittedly AA's 1:30 departure is that much later than Delta's 12:30am out of Haneda, but are these flight times any worse than the 3am departures out of the Gulf states?

Anecdotally Haneda is vastly preferred by Americans doing business in Tokyo, and as Tokyo prepares to host the Olympics and has put money into making Haneda shine, I can only expect those routes to continue. Bottom line is Haneda is about an hour closer to central Tokyo than Narita is, and is just a no-brainer if it's an option.


Reply
(@askmrlee)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 111

But as an airport, I love Haneda and the JAL lounge. Travelers without too much luggage can handle the 2 monorails and 2 rail line connections from Tokyo Disneyland needed after the last Airport Limo Bus.


Reply
 Ben
(@ben)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

"As you can probably tell, those aren’t the most ideal time, though the issue with Tokyo Haneda is that they restrict longhaul flights to off-peak hours, and as a result those flights have to arrive and depart in the middle of the night."

Actually it's because HND is slot-restrained; long haul flights aren't restricted from arriving/departing at reasonable hours. AC5/6 is a good (only) example


Reply
 Bill
(@Bill)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 254

I've flown to/from Tokyo once for leisure: into NRT and out of HND. I preferred HND because of its proximity to the city, and didn't mind the late departure time. So, I think Nick has the better argument!


Reply
 JMR
(@jmr)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Well.... at least you don't have to explain the mysteries of time travel to USAIR agents 😛


Reply
(@Kevin)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 234

I'll take HND over NRT all day long. The 1:30am departure time is worth it. Also for the EXP's, the First Class lounge in HND is awesome.


Reply
(@pavel)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 352

i second the sentiment of HND over NRT. both airports are quality but man, NRT is far off. after having to do the Narita Express six times in a week a few years ago, I started exploring more HND options.


Reply
(@r0m8470)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Ben, thanks for posting this. I have a travel plan to Asia in late spring next year. I have enough miles for any of the alliances, although using AAdvantage is nice, since the requirement for J is relatively modest. However, I have not been able to find any space in their own metal at all, at Saver level, all the way to September next year, from any of their gateway cities (DFW, ORD, LAX, to PVG, ICN, PEK, HKG, HND, NRT).

CX has been spotty too, at least until May next year. JAL is relatively better, their 787 DFW-NRT route shows some J space. The routes with shell flat neo seats also has better availability.

Anyway, do you also notice the stingyness of AA, especially for the J cabin saver space? I can't even find this flight listed when I look for award space (Saver or Anytime) on AA.com.


Reply
(@Global Highlander)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 34

I don't think a 1:30am departure time is that bad. And the JAL First Class Lounge is awesome. Lucky would love the Red Suite.

If you're actually spending time in Tokyo, HND is more convenient. If you're connecting, I love the CX 747 that flies from HKG to HND.


Reply
(@Franklyn)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 46

Actually only US flights are limited to these crazy hours. The bilateral governing HND needs to be renegotiated so that US flights can get daytime HND slots.


Reply
(@DallasFortWorthSpotter)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 20

Is that your picture??? Of the AA 787-8?

Follow me on Instagram!
-@dallasfortworthspotter


Reply
(@DavidB)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 154

HND is ideal for those just visiting Tokyo and not connecting beyond. The arrival/departure times (an example of Japan's approach to "open markets") make this an impractical transit airport for flights within Japan, or to other countries in Asia. It is for this very reason AA would not give up its NRT flights since they connect with dozens of JL flights both domestic and international. (Not to mention boasting one of AA's better Admirals Clubs is at NRT.) It's essential for AA's Pacific strategy to have this NRT hub (just as it is for DL and UA). I agree getting to/from HND at these hours by the otherwise excellent public transit options is a problem if flights arrive later than 11p, but for business travellers -- AA's bread and butter -- a cab to/from the hotel is reasonable and permits a night at the hotel to prepare for next day meetings, and gives a full business day/evening before departing. Flights from NRT to the US proscribe the departure day to breakfast meetings at best. As long as these flights have good on-time reliability HND should be a winner. But if flights are delayed into HND, they'll be a disaster for those without expense accounts.


Reply
(@Alvin L)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 11

Haneda is absolutely much better than Narita for OW flyers. Though agree that for AA, the arrival time at 11pm Jpn time, you aren't going to go anywhere and taxis in Japan have a 20% increased taxi rate in the night. So you are looking at around 70-80 USD just to get to your hotel in town.
Interesting to see how they would make the LA route work... Would have loved to see a Hawaii - haneda route though as a person living in Japan. The load factor to Hawaii is way higher and much better for those times.


Reply
 Al
(@Al)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 481

Thank you Nick.


Reply
(@Guy Donald)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 1

Why on earth are governments involved in these sorts of decisions?


Reply
(@Tom Thomas)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 5

I'm flying this one eastbound at the beginning of March, as part of a RTW business itinerary, LHR-ICN-GMP-HND-LAX-open-SAN-LHR. Three out of the total four legs on 787, which I'm quite chuffed about


Reply