Amazon Executive Fired After Upgrading Flight

An Amazon executive has filed a lawsuit after he was fired following him upgrading a flight to New Zealand…

Amazon executive didn’t want to fly coach to New Zealand

Marc Sadeghi was the global head of visual effects for Amazon Studios, based in Culver City, California. After accepting the job he became familiar with Amazon’s frugal travel policy, requiring a vast majority of employees to fly coach or pay for their own seat upgrades. That’s in stark contrast to much of the entertainment industry, where business class on many flights is the norm.

Sadeghi had a work trip to New Zealand, but didn’t want to fly in economy. He claimed to have back problems — scoliosis and sciatica — and needed more room to stretch out. Unfortunately for him, he was denied several times:

  • He told his manager that a 14-hour flight in economy would leave him in so much pain that it would take him two months to recover, to which the reply was that this is a “bummer”
  • When he talked to Amazon Studios’ head of drama production, it was suggested that he should try to get a medical clearance from Amazon, but that could take months, and he needed to take the trip right away

At this point Sadeghi got his assistant involved:

  • He had heard through the grapevine that you could get a free upgrade on Air New Zealand, so he instructed his assistant to get him on the free upgrade list; the assistant failed to do so, which isn’t surprising, since there’s no such list
  • He alleges that his assistant told him that another manager had previously used the company credit card to pay for an upgrade at the gate, and handled it internally afterwards, so that’s exactly what Sadeghi did, figuring he could handle it after the fact

Amazon fired executive for policy infractions

When Sadeghi returned from New Zealand in December 2019, he was asked to meet with a representative from human resources to go over some “allegations,” and he was forced to turn over his laptop and badge. At this point he was asked a series of questions:

  • “Have you ever asked your assistant to run personal errands?”
  • “Have you ever sent your assistant a picture of a cartoon penis?”
  • “Have you ever instructed your assistant to break policy?”

At this point Sadeghi realized that his assistant had “turned on him.” He had already doubted his assistant’s loyalty, as he noticed the assistant secretly recording him the day before Thanksgiving break.

Allegations included that Sadeghi had misused company funds, and had used off-color language. He argued that the company fostered an environment where such language was tolerated, even stating that he heard another executive refer to someone else as a “squirrelly c**t.”

A few days later he was informed that an investigation had uncovered a pattern of multiple policy infractions, and he was terminated.

Sadeghi has filed a lawsuit against the company for disability discrimination, failing to provide a reasonable accommodation, and wrongful termination. He claimed the investigation wasn’t fair, and that it was illegal for his assistant to record him.

My take on this story

What a story. A few things stand out to me here:

  • I didn’t realize Amazon had such a stingy travel policy, as it seems really extreme to not even offer premium economy on an ultra long haul flight
  • At the same time, if this guy was accepting a job where he was going to have to travel a fair bit, and if he had medical conditions that would cause him to take months to recover following a long haul flight in economy, shouldn’t he have checked with the company on the policy prior to accepting the job?
  • If he really wanted the upgrade he should have paid the difference himself, either with cash or miles; instead he relied on some imaginary upgrade concept (asking to be put on the free upgrade list), and then putting the upgrade on the company credit card because his assistant said someone else did that, even though he was explicitly told the company wouldn’t pay for his upgrade
  • It sure sounds like this wasn’t the guy’s only infraction, but rather that this was the straw that broke the camel’s back

Like I said, I absolutely think Amazon’s policy is ridiculously stingy, but it’s also on him to know the company’s travel policy before he accepts a job.

Bottom line

An Amazon executive was terminated after upgrading a flight to New Zealand with a company credit card, after being told the company wouldn’t pay for his upgrade. It sounds like there were some other infractions on his part that ultimately caused him to be fired, and this was just an easy thing to get him on.

The man is now suing the company for disability discrimination and more, so I’ll be curious to see what comes of this. Like I said, Amazon’s travel policy seems extremely stingy, but he should have also known that coming in.

What do you make of this Amazon upgrade situation?

Conversations (208)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Cedric Guest

This sort of travel is ALWAYS disclosed before you sign up for a job. So he knew before hand. I'm going to call BS on his medical condition...

0
‼ 0
Genette Guest

I work for many big companies like AT&t Delta airlines Nokia and others. Most of my jobs had travel involved in them. I knew the policy, therefore he should have been fired, for intentionally trying not to follow the policies

0
‼ 0
RLW Guest

While it may seem like a stingy policy, it is not an uncommon one for many tech companies. Intel has a similar policy where they ONLY pay for coach, period. In these companies this includes CEOs, chairpersons, etc. they all have to upgrade on their own dime.

0
‼ 0
Dantrin Guest

So to sum it up: - regardless of the cartoon penis, and violations of company policy, amazon failed to address a request for a reasonable accomodation. They will probably lose that case. - firing him may or may not have been illegal retaliation. But the timing certainly looks bad. - don't send penis pics to women at work. Just don't. - he should have paid for the upgrade himself, followed the reasonable accomodation policy at amazon for future trips. If he was approved for business class travel, he could then discuss with amazon whether they should reimburse him. If they refused, he would have a decision to make on whether to file a complaint, accuse them of violating the ada and force them to pay damages or just let it go. With what he makes, it's like you or I asking for an ergonomic keyboard. They refuse so we buy it ourselves. Then we go through the process, and get approved for the other couple items we asked for. Are you really going to sue over that? Then your boss retaliates and you have to go through all that. Yea, maybe you get a few bucks at the end, but is it worth it. The problem is now solved. After a few months the process went through so you got all the other stuff you wanted. BUT you had to pay 60 bucks for your own keyboard. Sometimes you need to know how to pick your battles.

0
‼ 0
Dantrin Guest

Charles: you are incorrect. The law requires amazon to provide reasonable accomodations to employees with disabilities. It's quite clear. Amazon had a legal obligation to address that request. One he said he needed it due to a medical condition, amazon was obligated to respond. Most companies have a process but it is not considered a valid excuse that the employee simply asked rather than gli g through that process. Amazon had a responsibility to comply with the request or offer their accomodations process to the employee so once he made a request. They did neither. They blew him off. They should have known better. If he really has back problems, and they blew him off, they are going to pay some money. In fact, even if their excuses for firing him are totally legit, they STILL failed to comply with the law.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published