Are Airlines Killing The Golden Goose?

I’d argue frequent flyer programs are one of the best ideas the airlines ever had. I think it would be any capitalist’s dream to be able to make hundreds of millions of dollars selling a “currency” where you control every aspect of the earnings and redemption rates.

If the airlines want to change how many miles they give to members, they can do that. If they want to change how many miles it takes to “buy” something, they can do that as well. Heck, you don’t even own the miles you “earn” from the airlines — instead the airlines do.

Historically frequent flyer programs are the only consistently profitable part of airlines’ operations. American might not even be in business if it weren’t for Citi buying hundreds of millions of dollars worth of miles from them upfront when they were in Chapter 11.

But there’s one huge mistake I think the airlines are making. Let me explain…

I don’t blame airlines for revenue based earning

With the upcoming AAdvantage changes, all of the “big three” US carriers will issue miles based on revenue rather than distance flown. As someone who likes good deals, am I fan of that system? No way. Do I understand where the airlines are coming from? Absolutely, and therefore I don’t blame them — it may very well be the right business decision.

Delta-SkyMiles-Revenue-Calculator

Airlines are trying to monetize their frequent flyer programs even more. In the US, over half of miles are issued through non-flying means (credit cards, dining programs, shopping portals, etc.). That number keeps growing every year.

What it comes down to is simply that the airlines are doing extremely well, and they don’t need to give frequent flyers as much of an incentive to fly with them. They’re as aggressive as ever before about issuing miles, but they want it to be a profit center rather than a cost center.

Why miles have become so popular (and mutually beneficial)

While many of us perhaps take it to an extreme, we’re not the only ones into miles & points. Look at how many Americans have credit cards which earn points that can be redeemed towards flights or hotel stays. It really is incredible how much frequent flyer programs have become a part of everyone’s day-to-day life, even without really realizing it.

Why are miles so awesome? Because they don’t have a fixed value, and that’s what makes them so lucrative. Most people redeem their miles extremely inefficiently, because they’re at an information disadvantage.

But they continue to collect them because miles are this aspirational currency. When I say “aspirational” I’m not just talking about redeeming miles for Cathay Pacific first class or Etihad first class, but rather that people view it as monopoly money, and are excited when they can get something for “free.”

Krug
“Aspirational” awards aren’t limited to international first class

When I tell non-frequent flyers what I do in a social setting, I’ve come to realize everyone has a story they want to share about redeeming miles. People are proud when they redeem their miles. “Oh yeah, I love miles, I redeemed them for a free ticket to Orlando last year, which saved me $200. I can’t wait to get my next free ticket.”

And that’s why the programs work so well.

The mistake I think airlines are making

This brings us to the misstep I think the airlines are making. I’m not going to argue that revenue based mileage earning is a bad idea. I don’t like it, but that doesn’t mean it’s not smart from the airlines’ perspectives.

But what I think is a really bad idea is that the “big three” US carriers are slowly headed towards revenue based redemptions. Delta SkyMiles wants your miles to be worth at most one cent each. They want you to view them as a currency that you can redeem for just about anything travel related. You can take $100 off the cost of a ticket by redeeming 10,000 miles. You can buy premium drinks in the SkyClub at the rate of 100 SkyMiles per dollar.

This is just the beginning, as they’re trying to condition consumers into thinking of SkyMiles as a currency they can redeem for just about anything at a fixed value. If there’s one thing we’ve learned over the years, it’s that when Delta does something, United and American follow. It certainly seems like that’s the direction things are headed.

So why is it a huge mistake to try and tie miles to a certain dollar value? Because if you want to make the frequent flyer programs thrive based on non-flying means, there needs to be a value proposition or an element of mystery/aspiration.

Simply put, there are credit cards which offer 2% cash back. I actually think most consumers would be better off with cash back cards rather than mileage earning cards, assuming they’re at an information disadvantage when it comes to redeeming miles.

But many still earn miles because the perceived value is higher, because they never really calculate the value of what they’re getting. If the airlines get to the point where one mile equals one cent, then there’s no mystery anymore. Then there’s no rational reason most consumers should use a credit card which basically earns 1% cash back towards travel on an airline rather than 2% cash back with no annual fee.

Bottom line

If this is the direction the airlines are headed, they’re making a huge mistake. And for that matter if they’re basing their entire business model around consumers being uninformed, then that’s not a very good place from which to start.

I get why Delta is wanting to make SkyMiles revenue based on the redemption side. A lot of people working at SkyMiles have backgrounds in revenue management. When they make a last minute saver award seat available on an international flight they’re saying “well, that seat would have cost $7,000 if someone bought it,” rather than saying “that seat would have gone out empty and not generated any revenue.” Surely there’s some middle ground between those two approaches.

What do you think — if mileage redemptions become revenue based with miles worth a penny each, would there be any reason to ever use a mileage credit card again? If this is the direction the airlines are headed, are they just counting on us being uninformed, or?

Conversations (54)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Mike Guest

This was amazing piece you wrote about. I know so many people who act that they got a great value using there points when it was mostly below 1% lol. The mystery behind the redemption is what makes points exciting to earn take that away it just becomes like a 1% card

0
‼ 0
JimT Guest

Typo above folks. The last sentence should be 2.5 to 2.7 percent. This is a net yield on a combination of AMEX 5% Blue Cash, Citibank Double Cash, and Capital One Quicksilver cards. Have a nice New Year all.

0
‼ 0
Brice Guest

I disagree that they're hurting the aspirational angle, many people aspire to getting a free economy class ticket. I showed my father how switching his spend from one card to another would be enough to change his annual award ticket to Europe from economy to business and he responded by saying "but I like my card." As mentioned before, this is purely secular. I wish we never have another recession but we will, and then there'll be all sorts of incentives. It might not be miles & points exactly but it'll be something. Maybe flyer vouchers will make a comeback or lifetime passes (please please please!!) There'll be something.

0
‼ 0
Another Steve Guest

Killing the aspirational aspect of the programs will kill the programs. Providing a 1% rebate in a currency of extremely limited utility will never be enough to sway the purchasing decisions of airfare customers who have a choice. 1% fixed rebate means that every airline will need to compete based on price, service and convenience, or they will need lots and lots of corporate contracts. Delta can compete on price and service, I have no idea how AA thinks they'll compete, because the FFP was the only thing they were best at. And providing a 1% rebate in a currency of extremely limited utility is not going to capture any credit card customers when there are other cards that offer a 2% rebate in a currency with almost unlimited utility (cash). Killing the FFP programs is the best thing for the shareholders over the next 6 to 12 months, but when the economy turns they will regret it. It's funny how quickly these geniuses forget that selling miles to banks is what kept them from being liquidated about 5 years ago. They've not only forgotten that but they've deluded themselves into the fantastical belief that the record profits they are earning is due to their exceptional strategic acumen, rather than massive fuel price drops they had nothing to do with. Interesting that despite pulling most award seats AA has declining passenger revenue per available seat mile. Wonder if they have any clue where that PRASM is headed when the economy cools off.

0
‼ 0
Michael Guest

Cheaper fares are where they need seats filled. In a way they are doing themselves a disservice to steer people away from those emptier planes. It's not like the difference in earned miles is huge given the increase in miles needed to get free flights. They may be creating unintended consequences. I suspect they hope those who have companies paying will opt higher to earn more, it not being their money being spent. But since there are already other incentives for paying more, it seems the wrong path to me.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published