Creepy: Air Marshals Are Following Dozens Of Regular Travelers Every Day

The US has had a federal air marshal program for decades, since long before 9/11. Nowadays this is under the supervision of the Transportation Security Administration, and the program has an annual budget of nearly a billion dollars.

The federal air marshal program doesn’t have much to show for their work, as they’ve never actively stopped anything. There have, however, been many incidents involving air marshals, where they leave guns behind, or air marshals themselves get arrested.

I’ve had my fair share of interactions with air marshals over the years, including once being interrogated by them back when I was a teenager. Generally my assumption has been that they’re being assigned flights based on routes that are considered higher risk. For example, back in the day every flight to/from Washington Reagan Airport would have air marshals, though I don’t believe that’s the case anymore.

As it turns out, air marshals are doing a lot more than that, and it’s actually sort of creepy.

The Boston Globe has a story about how Federal Air Marshals have what’s called the “Quiet Skies” program, where they’re tracking an average of about 35 ordinary citizens every day on planes. Rather than flying on routes that are deemed high risk, air marshals are being assigned flights just to follow people. Every single move these passengers make is being documented, and they don’t even know it.

According to the internal bulletin, air marshals are following passengers who “are not under investigation by any agency and are not in the Terrorist Screening Data Base,” and the goal of the program is described as preventing risks “posed by unknown or partially known terrorists.”

When someone is on the Quiet Skies list, a team of air marshals will be put on their flight, and the air marshals will receive a file with a photo and basic information about them, and then will be given a list they have to complete. The air marshals have to note whether the passenger uses the lavatory, if they engaged in conversation with others, if they texted, if they stopped while in transit through the airport, and much more.

It appears like many air marshals are uncomfortable with this concept. For example:

In late May, an air marshal complained to colleagues about having just surveilled a working Southwest Airlines flight attendant as part of a Quiet Skies mission. “Cannot make this up,” the air marshal wrote in a message.

One colleague replied: “jeez we need to have an easy way to document this nonsense. Congress needs to know that it’s gone from bad to worse.”

One air marshal described an assignment to conduct a Quiet Skies mission on a young executive from a major company.

“Her crime apparently was she flew to Turkey in the past,” the air marshal said, noting that many international companies have executives travel through Turkey.

The president of the Air Marshal Association has also spoken out against this, noting that this is a waste of time, and that resources could be better spent in other ways:

“The Air Marshal Association believes that missions based on recognized intelligence, or in support of ongoing federal investigations, is the proper criteria for flight scheduling. Currently the Quiet Skies program does not meet the criteria we find acceptable.

The American public would be better served if these [air marshals] were instead assigned to airport screening and check in areas so that active shooter events can be swiftly ended, and violations of federal crimes can be properly and consistently addressed.”

Just wow…

Conversations (42)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Airielle Guest

Our son flew across the country to spend some time with his biological father and grandma for part of the summer. While waiting for our flight we noticed a gentleman sitting across from us that was watching us. We moved, he followed. We went to eat, he sat in view of us. We noticed him looking up at us throughout lunch in the airport terminal. Our son was 6 at the time and we got scared--he was flying unsupervised. When he landed with his dad, his dad confirmed that this guy sat next to our son the entire time and escorted him out with the flight attendants and was an air marshal. I understand this man wasn't a threat to my son as an air marshal and wasn't planning any harm to him, but it was incredibly unsettling and hard to let him board the plane without us. But really--you're tracking a 6-year-old boy?

0
‼ 0
Ben L. Diamond

@SPK and you proved mine, cop

0
‼ 0
JA Diamond

The thing about intelligence work, including Air Marshals, is that we don't know when the succeed - they don't advertise "we stopped this big bad plan." We do find out when they fail, because then something bad happens. But it could very well be that there's a lot more bad things that are attempted which are stopped because of the work of the intelligence agencies, again, including the Air Marshals. We have to trust that the oversight by those who are told about the actual successes - the career officials running the programs, the political appointees running the department, and yes, Congress - allocates funding appropriately, funding programs that have some role to play in keeping the public safe.

0
‼ 0
SPK Guest

@Ben L. ACAB? You proved my point...way to be original, keyboard ninja.

0
‼ 0
Ben L. Diamond

I'm glad SPK feels insulted, because the IC has caused far more harm than good to the well-being of American citizens in the post 9/11 world. ACAB, spook.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published