AirAsia X Plans To Fly To US West Coast Using A330-900neos

For those of you who may not be familiar with AirAsia, they are Asia’s biggest low cost airline. I’ve flown them several times, and found them to be fantastic at what they do. They offer unbelievably cheap fares on short hops around Southeast Asia, as well as longer flights to Northern Asia, and Australia.

For example, last year I needed to fly from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore. This is a flight of less than an hour, so the carrier really didn’t matter. I booked an AirAsia flight for around USD$20 only a month in advance — that is incredible value, and the flight was perfectly fine.

Want to fly from Kuala Lumpur to Bangkok next weekend? Expect to pay top prices for a last minute flight?

AirAsia X

AirAsia X is the long haul arm of the AirAsia family. They did attempt flights to London and Paris many years ago, but the economics of long haul, low cost flights just didn’t add up at the time. But we have seen a huge increase in this model in the last 12 months, especially from the likes of Norwegian, which can fill planes on long haul flights at low prices.

AirAsia X already flies from their largest hub in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Hawaii in the US, via Osaka Kansai. However they really want to service the mainland USA, starting with West Coast cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco.

The only thing stopping them is that they don’t have any aircraft that can fly that far. While other low cost carriers like Norwegian and Scoot have invested in Boeing 787 Dreamliners, AirAsia X hasn’t.

But they do have as astonishing one HUNDRED Airbus A330-900 aircraft on order, with deliveries from 2019, and this opens up new route opportunities for them. AirAsia Group CEO and Founder Tony Fernandez has told Nikkei Asia Review that they are assessing the best West Coast USA city to launch their new aircraft to. He has said:

If I were I betting man, you’d probably say Los Angeles first. But both have very large Asian communities as well. Both cities [Los Angeles and San Francisco] that people want to fly to, anyway. We haven’t finished the evaluation but that is definitely our plan.

Las Vegas is also in the cards.

Now, the A300-900neo has a range of 7,200 miles, but the distance between Kuala Lumpur and Los Angeles, where I assume AirAsia would want to launch any new long haul flights from, is 8,800 miles. So these flights will have to stop somewhere along the way. Tony Fernandez has indicated that the West Coast USA flights will route via Japan, presumably either Tokyo or Osaka.

The Japan to Los Angeles leg is well within the range of the A330-900neo, at around 5,500 miles.

AirAsia loves Tokyo as a connecting hub because they believe its one of the most central locations in the world.

There’s obviously huge competition already on the Tokyo to Los Angeles route, but these are from full service carriers with higher cost bases. I do think there’s plenty of opportunity for a low cost carrier to enter the market, and AirAsia really knows what they are doing transporting passengers around Asia, at least.

Bottom line

There are currently no direct flights between Kuala Lumpur and Los Angeles, or Bangkok to Los Angeles for that matter (Don Mueang airport is AirAsia Group’s second biggest hub). My limit for low cost flights tops out at about 6 hours, but while AirAsia is low cost, and the stop in Japan on the way to the West Coast USA isn’t ideal, there will be plenty of passengers at the right price.

Would you fly AirAsia between Kuala Lumpur and Los Angeles for the right price?

Conversations (35)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Napmaster Guest

AirAsia X means travel opportunities for everyone. Europe done, Asia is next!

0
‼ 0
Henry Young Guest

I always take an empty bottle through security and fill it up at a drinking fountain - when in economy obviously. AirAsia - it is what it is and you gotta go in with eyes open and make it work for you. But when you need to get around SE Asia cheaply because your points are better used for European/American travel, AirAsia is a pragmatic choice. Plus it's so cheap you'd be mad to burn points on a more costly competitor.

0
‼ 0
KLB Guest

Be aware what you get when you book on Air Asia. You have to declare how many kg of luggage when you book your ticket, or the price per kg increases many-fold. I was choking on some spicy food (ordered at initial booking), and couldn’t get a glass of water — had to buy a bottle. Think Spirit Air on a trans-Pacific run. I’ll pass.

0
‼ 0
RobA Guest

I’d pass, especially with numerous safety incidents documented

0
‼ 0
Henry Young Guest

I use Air Asia out of Manila. They are super competitive domestically (although the domestic T4 sucks), and also across SE Asia (T3 for international - a much better terminal). But be aware that unless you are traveling alone, you should factor the extra cost of seat allocation into your comparison. Whereas most other airlines will allow you free choice of available seats when checking in online, Air Asia literally cheats. I booked to travel to Tapei a few weeks ago with 3 others. Their online booking system allocated us 4 seats randomly through the cabin. No problem I thought - I can tidy that up at check-in. When I went through online check-in, the seat page showed every zero cost seat as unavailable and only the paid for seat allocations at the front were available. The only way I could get even 3 seats together was to pay up. When I boarded the flight and saw it less than 50% full I realize what AA had done. I felt cheated. So when comparing ticket prices with other carriers who are more relaxed about online check-in seat selection (such as Cebu Pacific), add the seat allocation cost to the AA fare. Everything is a chargeable extra. That's ok, but understand what you are getting up front.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member