JetBlue Talking To “Multiple Airlines” About New Partnership

JetBlue Talking To “Multiple Airlines” About New Partnership

34

A JetBlue executive has just made some interesting comments about the carrier pursuing partnerships. I don’t think there’s anything earth shattering here, but it’s still interesting to hear it directly from someone at the airline.

JetBlue aggressively pursuing airline partnerships

During a Barclays industry conference, JetBlue President Marty St. George revealed that the company is talking with “multiple airlines” about a potential partnership. As he explained, “if we find a deal that’s accretive, we’ll absolutely do it.”

A large motivation for such a partnership is also the positive impact it would have on the loyalty program, increasing the ability for TrueBlue members to earn and redeem points on more airlines. In recent times, JetBlue executives have definitely realized that the company has quite a bit of upside with its loyalty program. As St. George explained, “given that we really don’t have full global earn and burn, I think to be able to add that to our network would be very, very helpful.”

JetBlue doesn’t belong to any major alliance, but perhaps the carrier’s most significant partnership has been with American, where the two companies launched a Northeast Alliance back in 2021. The idea was that JetBlue would provide feed for American’s international network out of New York, strengthening both airlines.

A judge ultimately ended up blocking the arrangement, arguing it was anticompetitive. That’s not to say that a slightly scaled back version of the partnership couldn’t work, but rather the issue was how deep the partnership was, with the airlines coordinating slots, etc.

JetBlue also has some foreign airline partners, with arrangements ranging from reciprocal loyalty collaborations (like with Qatar Airways and TAP Air Portugal), to a simple interline agreement (with a countless number of airlines).

JetBlue is pursuing airline partnerships

What partnerships would make sense for JetBlue?

Of course it’s possible that JetBlue continues to work on partnerships with foreign airlines. However, those are only going to be so valuable, and won’t really be a game changer for the airline, or for the frequent flyer program. The fact that St. George talked about wanting “full global earn and burn” suggests to me that he’s hoping to partner with a US airline.

It’s a given that a Delta partnership just wouldn’t make sense. The two airlines compete directly in both Boston and New York, so they’re not really complements.

I can see merit to resuming a partnership with American. That shouldn’t cause any regulatory issues, as long as it’s not as close as last time, where the airlines did a lot more behind the scenes coordinating than most consumers realized.

A simple codeshare partnership with frequent flyer reciprocity could go a long way for both airlines, helping JetBlue fill seats and boost its loyalty program, while helping American fill seats out of New York and elsewhere.

Could we see American & JetBlue rekindle things?

A JetBlue partnership with United is an interesting concept, but I struggle to see how it would work in practice. We know that United desperately wants to return to New York (JFK), but a simple partnership wouldn’t help the airline do that, and anything beyond that would have to clear some sort of antitrust hurdle.

For that matter, JetBlue’s core strength is New York and Boston, so it’s not like the airline wants to scale back its network there, and let in a competitor, even if there’s a partnership.

One would also think that there would be merit to JetBlue joining one of the major global alliances. Could we maybe see JetBlue join either oneworld or Star Alliance?

It seems like oneworld would make sense, in the same way that Alaska also belongs to the alliance, and it’s mutually beneficial. Meanwhile I could see logic to Star Alliance as well, though I still can’t quite figure out how United could get something out of this in a way that wouldn’t cause regulatory issues. I mean, if nothing else, lots of Star Alliance airlines fly to New York (JFK), and JetBlue has a lot of room to add value there.

Anyway, obviously JetBlue is hoping for something major on the partnership front. I think it’ll happen sooner or later, but only time will tell what it looks like.

Could a JetBlue & United partnership make sense?

Bottom line

JetBlue President Marty St. George once again went on the record to state that the airline is talking to multiple airlines about a possible partnership, and the goal is to be able to offer full global earn and burn with the frequent flyer program.

This is all a great goal, and I do think something will eventually be worked out. JetBlue is one of the biggest competitors to Delta in both New York and Boston, and surely there’s a way JetBlue could work with either American or United for the common good of the airlines, plus to give consumers more choice.

With JetBlue talking to multiple airlines about partnerships, how do you see this playing out?

Conversations (34)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. loungeaccess Guest

    JetBlue Airways, dba American Airlines.

    1. Tim Dunn Diamond

      then that would mean B6 will never make more than 1% profit margins.

      Maybe there is a fit

  2. Brian Guest

    Would the DOJ allow JB and Alaska to merge after Alaska just acquired Hawaiian?

  3. digital_notmad Diamond

    I mean now that we don't really have "antitrust" anymore, restarting the AA partnership (or replacing with UA) would be a slam dunk.

    1. Tim Dunn Diamond

      "we don't really have "antitrust" anymore"

      Please provide proof, not wishes.

    2. ORD_Is_My_Second_Home Diamond

      They're not going after DL for their games of footsie with Aeromexico or WestJet. Enough proof that the US government is letting companies get vwith criminal conspiracy? At the very least, it's RICO, considering that Delta is a criminal conspiracy by itself.

    3. Tim Dunn Diamond

      Are you off your meds again?

      Delta has a JV with AM and equity in them. There is no JV w/ WestJet.

      Feel free to let us know what is being violated in that relationship.

      We've just been told here over the past few days that UA has the largest TATL JV which not only involves the LH Group but also Air Canada.

      but to the point that you missed, no, we...

      Are you off your meds again?

      Delta has a JV with AM and equity in them. There is no JV w/ WestJet.

      Feel free to let us know what is being violated in that relationship.

      We've just been told here over the past few days that UA has the largest TATL JV which not only involves the LH Group but also Air Canada.

      but to the point that you missed, no, we aren't going to have joint ventures between two domestic airlines as AA and B6 tried to do because they can't compete w/ DL - with whom they both most overlap in the NE.

      and it is B6 that is shopping for partners - which should send chills up the spines of AA execs

    4. digital_notmad Diamond

      you seem kinda rattled, tim, and i'm not quite sure why - surely a partnership with AA or UA would not threaten the world's most premium airline, friend! rest easy.

    5. Tim Dunn Diamond

      it is actually the Phantom of Terminal 1 at ORD that is rattled.

      Delta doesn't need partners to compete.

      UA is begging to get back into JFK.

      AA and its fans are praying that the feds will turn a blind eye to antitrust so they can give the NEA another try.

      No, I am not rattled.

      DL is competitively in the best position in the US airline industry.

      aren't you glad you through your hat into the ring?

    6. Mark Guest

      *threw

      And UA already has the single best hub in the northeast with EWR. DL needs two airports, one of them restricted by a perimeter rule, to carry close to what UA carries.

      Some transcons from JFK would be gravy on top of what they already have in NYC.

    7. Tim Dunn Diamond

      mark,
      and yet UA does not fly from JFK which is the largest longhaul airport from NYC just as LGA is for shorthaul traffic.

      Since you clearly can't grasp the concept, no airport in the NYC airport can support a 500 flight/day operation - and DL managed to build a network in NYC that supports more flights from NYC and on the east coast that allows it to be the largest.

      Let go of...

      mark,
      and yet UA does not fly from JFK which is the largest longhaul airport from NYC just as LGA is for shorthaul traffic.

      Since you clearly can't grasp the concept, no airport in the NYC airport can support a 500 flight/day operation - and DL managed to build a network in NYC that supports more flights from NYC and on the east coast that allows it to be the largest.

      Let go of the ego that UA did or has it best in NYC, Mark. The evidence is overwhelmingly against that notion. UA acquired CO that did some novel things w/ EWR but EWR is simply not the best hub on the NYC or can singularly do what multiple airports can do. Only by cherrypicking a few datapoints and ignoring others can you come up w/ your claims about UA at NYC.

    8. Mike C Diamond

      "it is actually the Phantom of Terminal 1 at ORD that is rattled." Thanks for that Tim, you made me laugh. A very ORDinary debating style. (Not that my saying that was much better.)

    9. KS Guest

      Oh, so DL can ‘compete’ in London without VS? In Mexico without AM? In South America without LATAM? Give me a break.

    10. Tim Dunn Diamond

      and we can say the same thing about AA and and specific parts of the world including the US because of their JVs.

  4. Anthony Diamond

    Given the lukewarm attempts JetBlue made to revive the NEA after it was struck down, it seems like American saw it as more important/beneficial than JetBlue did. The fact that commentators here liked the NEA due to cheap transcons they could credit to American supports that. I would be surprised if they did an AA agreement again (though I won't rule it out)

  5. George Romey Guest

    If Jetblue doesn't want a full merger the NEA makes the most sense. Take a stab at it again.

  6. FF Guest

    Alaska /Hawaiian with their west coast hubs and B6 on the east could create a true 4th carrier that could compete with the BIG 3, Joining OW alliance would cherry on top.

  7. Tim Dunn Diamond

    It seems clear that B6 is looking for the right partner and they are willing to get into a bidding war for their services. They fundamentally have a decent franchise.

    AA and B6 could work on the same basis as AA/AS - no revenue sharing and no joint schedule coordination or pricing.

    UA wants back in JFK. Only if B6 is wiling to give part of their slots to UA for it to operate...

    It seems clear that B6 is looking for the right partner and they are willing to get into a bidding war for their services. They fundamentally have a decent franchise.

    AA and B6 could work on the same basis as AA/AS - no revenue sharing and no joint schedule coordination or pricing.

    UA wants back in JFK. Only if B6 is wiling to give part of their slots to UA for it to operate its own flights would it make any sense.... but the flights that UA wants to operate are transcon flights which are the bread and butter of B6' revenue... they are not likely to give a competitor access

    WN could also make sense strategically and, given the hedge funds behind both airlines might be what ends up happening.

    And then there is AS that could have a partnership at little cost and connect two eastern and western US airlines.

    Lots of possibilities.

    DL seems to be the only airline that strategically has what it needs to grow and can do it on its own.

    1. Love Oneworld Guest

      All good points. A WN tie up would seem very odd. I feel like the most long-run strategic sense lies with hooking up with either AA or AS and then joining Oneworld as a full member.

    2. ORD_Is_My_Second_Home Diamond

      You went a long way to get that humblebrag in for your boys. That's unexpected coming from you.

    3. eaci Guest

      And B6 already has a partnership with HA.

    4. Tim Dunn Diamond

      HA had a lot of partnerships pre-AS merger and the B6-HA partnership might survive but AS is of a far more valuable scale if that can be pulled off.

    5. Roberto Guest

      Word salad - “A word salad is a "confused or unintelligible mixture of seemingly random words and phrases",[1] most often used to describe a symptom of a neurological or mental disorder.”

    6. KS Guest

      Oh yeah, the airline who is a non-player in the largest market that is London or even Mexico or South America without the presence of their ever bankrupt and money pinching JV partners? Yeah makes a lot of sense…

  8. ORD_Is_My_Second_Home Diamond

    And no one's responding because no one wants the human garbage that live in Noo Yawk and Bahstun on their metal.

  9. Mike O. Guest

    As for international carriers, won't it make sense to partner up with the carriers in the new T6 @ JFK like ANA, CX, Aer Lingus, etc.?

  10. Ricport Guest

    IMO, tying up with UA makes the most sense. For the reasons already mentioned, I don't think DL would be interested, and there's too much bad history at this point to attempt another try with AA. Additionally, UA is very weak in terms of southeast (especially FL) routes, while B6 has a FLL hub that would provide UA a way to tap into that, the Caribbean and South America and even start their own hub...

    IMO, tying up with UA makes the most sense. For the reasons already mentioned, I don't think DL would be interested, and there's too much bad history at this point to attempt another try with AA. Additionally, UA is very weak in terms of southeast (especially FL) routes, while B6 has a FLL hub that would provide UA a way to tap into that, the Caribbean and South America and even start their own hub to rival AA at MIA and do it in an organic way. Plus, UA would provide B6 frequent fliers with a chance to access lounges, earn/redeem miles to many foreign destinations, and both carriers have similar products (in-seat IFE, snacks, etc.) that WN doesn't offer.

    1. dundj Guest

      Putting 2+2 together and likely making 9, based on the Southwest staff cuts and other considerations of further announcements, I'd suspect JetBlue either code sharing with Southwest or a merger between the two.

      This would envisage JetBlue expecting a merger with Southwest to pass anti trust proceedings or that a code sharing agreement won't impact in the manner that the agreement with AA did.

    2. ORD_Is_My_Second_Home Diamond

      I don't want my favored airline touching that evil pile of flaming dog crap B6. Idlewild isn't worth it, Scott.

  11. Brandon Guest

    Please, please, PLEASE bring back the NEA! I miss being able to choose between over a dozen transcon daily departures on AA.com, and love snagging those westbound evening departures in Mint for peanuts while earning LP’s.

    1. jacobin777 Gold

      I never flew on B6 when they were in the NEA however there were many good flight combinations when I would look at bookings.

      I doubt the NEA would happen however a nice extensive codeshare along with joining OneWorld would certainly be a good step.

    2. Boston Rob Guest

      Yes, NEA please! Maybe the new administration would look more favorably on the partnership.

    3. ORD_Is_My_Second_Home Diamond

      Naming yourself after the most disgusting mid-size city in the US and the sleaziest reality show contestant in history does you no favors.

    4. Watson Diamond

      Boston is a much better city than the sh*thole known as Chicago.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Brandon Guest

Please, please, PLEASE bring back the NEA! I miss being able to choose between over a dozen transcon daily departures on AA.com, and love snagging those westbound evening departures in Mint for peanuts while earning LP’s.

3
digital_notmad Diamond

I mean now that we don't really have "antitrust" anymore, restarting the AA partnership (or replacing with UA) would be a slam dunk.

2
FF Guest

Alaska /Hawaiian with their west coast hubs and B6 on the east could create a true 4th carrier that could compete with the BIG 3, Joining OW alliance would cherry on top.

2
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,527,136 Miles Traveled

39,914,500 Words Written

42,354 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT