Boeing 737 MAX Cleared By European Regulators

It’s official — the Boeing 737 MAX can once again return to the European skies. The 737 MAX was first grounded globally in March 2019, following two fatal crashes. Since then, Boeing has been making fixes to get the plane certified again.

We recently saw the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) “unground” the 737 MAX, and today European regulators have done the same.

EASA signs off on Boeing 737 MAX

Back in October 2020, Patrick Ky, Executive Director of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), stated that he was satisfied with the changes that Boeing has made to the 737 MAX.

Then in November 2020, the EASA published a Proposed Airworthiness Directive for the 737 MAX returning to service. There was still a 28-day public consultation period, but that has now been wrapped up.

The EASA has today given its approval for the 737 MAX to return to the skies.

As the Executive Director of the EASA describes this development:

“We have reached a significant milestone on a long road. Following extensive analysis by EASA, we have determined that the 737 MAX can safely return to service. This assessment was carried out in full independence of Boeing or the Federal Aviation Administration and without any economic or political pressure – we asked difficult questions until we got answers and pushed for solutions which satisfied our exacting safety requirements. We carried out our own flight tests and simulator sessions and did not rely on others to do this for us.

Let me be quite clear that this journey does not end here. We have every confidence that the aircraft is safe, which is the precondition for giving our approval. But we will continue to monitor 737 MAX operations closely as the aircraft resumes service. In parallel, and at our insistence, Boeing has also committed to work to enhance the aircraft still further in the medium term, in order to reach an even higher level of safety.”

The 737 MAX can return to the European skies

EASA mandates 737 MAX changes

The EASA is mandating several changes to the 737 MAX, including the following:

  • Software updates for the flight control computer, including the MCAS
  • Software updates to display an alert in case of disagreement between the two angle of attack sensors
  • Physical separation of wires routed from the cockpit to the stabilizer trim motor
  • Updates to flight manuals: operational limitations and improved procedures to equip pilots to understand and manage all relevant failure scenarios
  • Mandatory training for all 737 MAX pilots before they fly the plane again, and updates of the initial and recurrent training of pilots on the MAX
  • Tests of systems including the angle of attack sensor system
  • An operational readiness flight, without passengers, before commercial usage of each aircraft to ensure that all design changes have been correctly implemented and the aircraft successfully and safely brought out of its long period of storage

It’s interesting to note that even though the FAA and EASA worked fairly closely together and are going off the same information, the two organizations have mandated somewhat different changes.

Existing 737 MAXs will need software updates, and more

Support from foreign regulators is significant

The 737 MAX certification process and investigation has brought a lot of things to light, both regarding Boeing’s corporate culture, and also regarding its relationship with the FAA.

As the 737 MAX has undergone the certification process, one major question has been whether foreign regulators would follow the FAA’s lead. It’s certainly a good sign for Boeing that approval is coming from so many foreign regulators.

Will other regulators follow the lead of the FAA & EASA?

We’ll see how passengers respond

I’ll be very curious to see how the public responds to the 737 MAX returning to the skies:

  • So many people have said “I’ll never fly that plane,” but only time will tell if that’s just empty talk, or if people follow through on that; it could be like people who threaten to never fly an airline again, and then the next time when that airline is a dollar cheaper than the competitor, they book it
  • We’ve seen some airlines say they’ll let people rebook if they are scheduled to be on a 737 MAX, so I’m curious to see just how many airlines have a policy like this; perhaps it’s a moot point for now, as airlines are waiving change fees in general
  • Boeing is quietly rebranding the 737 MAX — for example, the Boeing 737 MAX 8 is now being branded as the 737-8, so clearly Boeing is hoping that people forget the “MAX” name

Would I be comfortable flying the 737 MAX? Well:

  • Have I lost a lot of respect for both Boeing and the FAA throughout this process? Absolutely
  • But personally I’d be happy to fly the 737 MAX again

Ironically airlines might be just as unhappy as passengers about the 737 MAX being cleared to fly again, because they’ll be on the hook for paying for these planes, and won’t be getting compensation from Boeing anymore.

Will passengers really not fly the 737 MAX?

Bottom line

The EASA has issued a final approval for the 737 MAX to return to the skies, and the plane should be flying again in Europe shortly. The EASA does have some requirements for the plane, which aren’t identical to the FAA’s requirements, interestingly enough.

Key regulators around the world have now signed off the plane, so I’ll be curious to see if other regulators follow. Perhaps most significant is what the Civil Aviation Administration of China, will do, given the political implications.

Conversations (47)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

KJ Guest

@David you are 100% correct. Aircraft are not grounded because of pilot incompetence. @Luke & @ Steve cc are talking nonsense. As a point of fact Ethiopia is deemed a poor country based on GDP,however Ethiopian Airlines,which is not a low cost carrier,is held in such high regard,that it conducted Covid-19 repatriation flights all over the globe on behalf of numerous governments,including the British & American.Poorly trained pilots flying for an airline,would certainly not be the choice of governments , repatriating their citizens,if your assertions were true. Airliners,sadly crash for a variety of reasons, however that doesn't mean that airlines operating aircraft types that have crashed with other airlines,are any safer than their unfortunate counterparts. The B737-200 is a case in point. How many fatal rudder-hardover crashes did that aircraft have?2?3? How many airlines worldwide operated that aircraft without incident?over 50,so an aircraft with a flaw can be flown for thousands of hours without incident,doesn't mean the flaw doesnt exist?No. It would have been the simplest thing in the world to blame the pilots,& not ground the max,if the facts would have allowed that course of action to be taken.After all it wasn't the first aircraft to have 2 crashes within 3 months of each other.Since that didn't happen, is it not logical to conclude that the fact that the aircraft was grounded & subsequently required a relatively extensive fix,for the offending system,illustrates,that this was not a case of simply not following the drill for a runaway stabiliser trim by the deceased crews?

0
‼ 0
Ali Guest

There’s still some concern, read this article: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-55751150

0
‼ 0
jkjkjk Guest

I fly delta, i don't fly max or 787. Simple as that. A220 FTW.

0
‼ 0
DeePeeGrumps Member

Perfect timing. The 737MAX will be deployed in a region where travel demand has dropped to the point where the plane will be pretty much empty when it falls out of the sky...again.

0
‼ 0
Chuck Guest

Dont care much. Would be better to get $69 to Florida. Could be a safest plane from now

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published