Wow: Backstory Of Cathay Pacific CEO’s Resignation

Update: There are reputable sources suggesting that this may not have actually happened, unfortunately. Hopefully we learn more. Even if it didn’t go down exactly like this, I wouldn’t be surprised if this wasn’t too far off (that he wasn’t willing to comply with orders, and at that point left).

Last Friday I wrote about how Cathay Pacific’s CEO suddenly resigned. Rupert Hogg had been CEO fo the company since May 2017, and by most accounts did a really good job. He had been with Cathay Pacific’s parent company for over 30 years. As he described his resignation:

“It has been my honour to lead the Cathay Pacific Group over the last three years. I am confident in the future of Hong Kong as the key aviation hub in Asia. However, these have been challenging weeks for the airline and it is right that Paul and I take responsibility as leaders of the company.”

It’s clear that it had been a rough few weeks for Cathay Pacific. For the past few months we’ve seen huge protests in Hong Kong, and Cathay Pacific got caught in the middle of that.

The Chinese government accused Cathay Pacific employees of participating in “illegal protests,” and requested that the airline start sharing all information about employees not only flying to China, but also passing through Chinese airspace.

Apparently this is also what led to Hogg’s resignation. According to media reports, China’s Civil Aviation Administration asked Hogg to hand over a list of Cathay Pacific employees who had participated in the protests.

According to these media sources, he did provide that report… but he put only put his own name on the list. Wow.

I understand that this is a contentious topic. While I have so much respect for what the people of Hong Kong are doing, I also respect that there are many people who are opposed to it.

If these reports are true, I have so much respect for what Hogg has done here. I feel like for the most part there’s such little accountability among corporate executives, especially in the airline industry.

So to see someone stand up for what they believe in and defend their workforce even at the expense of their own career is something you don’t often see in the corporate world.

I had a lot of respect for Hogg before this for how he ran Cathay Pacific, but now I have even more respect for him.

I’d say that any airline would be lucky to have him, though I guess we’ll see how that plays out, since I imagine many airlines wouldn’t want to do something that would so obviously annoy China.

Conversations (117)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Mauritz Guest

"I also respect that there are many people who are opposed to it." Excuse me, what? Long time lurker and fan of this blog, but saying that you understand why people oppose Hong Kong's last stance for a shiver of democracy from your privileged first class cabin is just offensive. I would have expected more from you.

0
‼ 0
Anthony Guest

Goes to show Mr Hogg was ignorant of international politics. How clueless could he be? Businesses should always stay out of politics. You should never bite the hand that feeds you. It's really common sense. Mr Hogg as a CEO should have known better. There is a legitimate security concern here. Who knows what the staff or pilot can do to sabotage China and its people? I don't think China is being harsh here. It's just pure stupidity from Cathay Pacific.

0
‼ 0
ericnyc Guest

Are you sure this is true? If so, I'm surprised the SCMP (HK's English-language paper of record) hasn't reported it. It would certainly be admirable, if true. But this version of events seems much more likely: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/transport/article/3023273/hong-kong-protests-have-caused-severe-turbulence-cathay

0
‼ 0
CuriousCat Gold

@Eskimo my point is HK is China, no running away from that fact ***** Yes, technically correct, thus one-country-two-systems is already meaningless?

0
‼ 0
Eskimo Guest

@CuriousCat LOL, my point is HK is China, no running away from that fact. I also try to point out HK endured even worse under “extra-territorial rights”, yet they survived. TBH, it doesn't matter if China can officially extradite or not, if they wanted they would. @AnthonyWC Wealth gap issue is everywhere not just Hong Kong. Even China can't solve wealth gap. But here is the thing, do you thing coming out to protest will solve anything? You are better off working and earning money rather than spending time protesting. Of course, if unemployment were to jump over 10% then there should be enough people with enough time to come out protest (while waiting to hear back from job applications).

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published