United Airlines Panasonic Wi-Fi Issues Over The Pacific: What’s Going On?

We’ll have to mark this as “developing,” but it seems worth acknowledging that United Airlines seems to be having some problems with Wi-Fi on its long haul flights, and it might not get better for some time.

Complaints of United Wi-Fi not working on long haul flights

Recently there have been many complaints online about Wi-Fi not working on long haul United flights. I’ve even received emails about it from readers, who were confused about what’s going on. Not that it was ever particularly fast, but it has gotten to the point where it’s simply not available on some flights, apparently.

For example, take the below complaint, about three consecutive long haul United flights without functioning Wi-Fi.

A response to that post suggests that maybe United didn’t renew its contract with Panasonic for wide body aircraft, ahead of the transition to Starlink.

While that’s a fair theory, I was skeptical. Since it’ll be another 19 or so months before all long haul United aircraft have Starlink, it would be wild to leave planes disconnected for that long.

I wondered if anything was actually going on. After all, Wi-Fi just doesn’t work on some flights and over some areas. So did anything actually meaningfully change, or is this just a confused passenger?

What’s actually going on with United’s Pacific Wi-Fi availability?

Here’s where it gets interesting. JonNYC recently quoted a source as saying that United pilots received a memo about how the long haul satellite provider (Panasonic) was basically saturated at certain times of the day, especially over the Pacific. This was basically an acknowledgement that United’s Wi-Fi doesn’t work on some (or many) flights.

JonNYC also confirms that what’s rumored above, about United ending its contract with Panasonic, isn’t correct. What I’m not certain of is if this is somehow a United specific Panasonic issue, or one that’s impacting all Panasonic customers equally?

It could be that we’re just hearing about this at United since the carrier has a much bigger route network across the Pacific than most other Panasonic customers. But if all Panasonic customers are impacted equally, you can also expect this to be an issue on American Airlines, Singapore Airlines, etc.

Anyway, I know not everyone cares about Wi-Fi equally, but this is definitely something to keep in mind, if you do. It would suck to board a 17-hour flight from San Francisco to Singapore with a morning departure, expecting to work for much of the flight, only to find the service to be unusable.

So definitely don’t trust United’s Wi-Fi coverage map, in terms of what you can currently rely on.

United Wi-Fi coverage map

Over the Pacific, expect coverage may currently look more like Delta’s coverage map, where there’s just no expectation of Wi-Fi in Asia and over much of the Pacific. 😉

Delta Wi-Fi coverage map

Bottom line

There have been lots of reports as of late of Wi-Fi on long haul United flights being unusable (or almost unusable). This is especially the case on flights over the Pacific, which have the Panasonic system.

No, United reportedly hasn’t terminated its contract with Panasonic, or anything like that. However, it seems the airline is dealing with some major coverage gaps and limits that are highly variable, meaning some flights have almost no connectivity.

It’s not clear to me if this is impacting all Panasonic airlines equally over the Pacific, and if we’re just hearing more about this with United because the airline has such a big Pacific network. Either way, it’s worth acknowledging that something is going on, but the issue isn’t that United has terminated its Panasonic contract.

If you’ve taken a long haul United flight recently, what was your Wi-Fi experience?

Conversations (49)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

UA Fan Guest

Just flew IAD-SFO on a 787 and then SFO-HKG on a 777, and 0 WiFi and no advance indication by UA or the flight attendants that there might not be WiFi. That's about 20 hours of lost productivity, but a full airfare charge by UA that advertises WiFi as an amenity. Sounds like false advertising. I like UA and think they can do better and should.

0
‼ 0
Steve Guest

Don't worry about not being able to work...enjoy being disconnected for a bit.

0
‼ 0
Bill Guest

As an additional data point, I flew HK-Melbourne today on a Cathay A350-900 which I believe is their only Panasonic equipped plane and the wifi worked fine. It wasn’t lightning fast but I didn’t notice anything different from the norm.

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

so, to be clear, UA waited so late to decide to install Starlink and then hyped it so much that its legacy WiFi solutions would crash and burn before Starlink was installed UA has 90% of its mainline fleet which has little to no functioning WiFi on it right now.

0
‼ 0
Herb_Repozo Gold

I will add my voice to this, now that I’ve landed and can connect again. Flew NH109 and had lost WiFi from over PANC. Figured Panasonic was the culprit…

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published