Portugal To Privatize National Airline TAP, Sell 44.9% Stake: Two Airline Groups Bid

Portugal To Privatize National Airline TAP, Sell 44.9% Stake: Two Airline Groups Bid

32

In the summer of 2025, the government of Portugal relaunched a project to privatize national carrier TAP Air Portugal, with the goal of selling a large stake within a year or so. All too often, not much comes of this, though it seems like this is moving along. Two major airline groups have just submitted bids to invest in TAP, so this should get interesting.

TAP Air Portugal privatization effort underway

Portugal’s government has relaunched an effort to privatize TAP Air Portugal, with the goal of selling a 44.9% stake within a year, with the possibility to give up a majority stake over time. As part of this, employees would also be offered a 5% stake in the company (meaning that the government would own 50.1% of the company).

Last summer, Prime Minister Luis Montenegro stated that he’s “convinced that there will be many interested parties.” For years there has been talk of privatizing TAP, so this is only the latest such effort, and it’s anyone’s guess how this plays out.

The latest round of privatization stalled in early 2025, when the country’s center-right minority government collapsed. The coalition returned to power after a May 2025 election, but didn’t have a majority in parliament, potentially causing a sale to be blocked.

Historically, TAP hasn’t been a terribly profitable airline, but its performance has improved over time. In 2021, the airline reported a record €1.6 billion loss, following the coronavirus pandemic. This caused a restructuring, which saw the government invest €3.2 billion in the company.

The airline has returned to profitability in recent years, though we’re talking about fairly mild profits. The company’s profits over the past three fully reported years (2022-2024) have been €65.6 million, €177.3 million, and €53.7 million.

In looking for a partner in this privatization, the government obviously hopes for as many synergies as possible, to improve the company’s long term prospect of profitability.

Last summer, Infrastructure Minister Miguel Pinto Luz stated that “we believe we can complete the privatization within a year,” emphasizing that even airlines from outside the European Union could express interest. The next step was for potential investors to prequalify for the sale, and there’s now an update when it comes to that.

Portugal once again wants to privatize TAP

Air France-KLM & Lufthansa Group are interested

While TAP Air Portugal isn’t independently some massively profitable airline, the company offers some significant synergies for other airline groups. Specifically, TAP has a strong network to Brazil, to Africa, and to the United States. This obviously holds significant strategic value for several airlines. For that matter, a large goal with acquisitions is simply to prevent competitors from getting in on the action instead.

We know that all three of the major European airline groups — Air France-KLM, IAG, and Lufthansa — have been interested in TAP Air Portugal at one point or another, primarily due to the carrier’s strength in Brazil, with the Africa network being a secondary strength.

The challenge is, it’s kind of hard to figure out how North America operations would complement the existing arrangements of airline groups. Obviously North America to Europe flying is heavily dominated by joint ventures (split by alliance, sort of), which have a lot of pricing power.

Historically, TAP has operated pretty independently to North America, often undercutting other carriers on price, with attractive fares in all cabins, including for one-way flights. Could we see TAP join one of the major joint ventures? Obviously it would totally change the carrier’s pricing model and market position.

Then there’s the whole issue of regulatory approval. Getting regulatory approval for such a deal will be no small task, given the number of parties that have to sign off on agreements like this, and the concessions required.

As I speculated last summer, Air France-KLM and Lufthansa Group have the most to gain with TAP, purely in terms of their existing geography and networks. There’s also upside for IAG, though not as much geographically, given where Aer Lingus, British Airways, and Iberia, have hubs.

So it’s not surprising to note that both Air France-KLM and Lufthansa Group have submitted non-binding bids for TAP. Meanwhile IAG has shared that after “careful consideration,” it has decided not to proceed with attempting to invest in TAP, instead focusing on growth opportunities within the existing group.

While I haven’t seen a longer statement from Lufthansa Group, Air France-KLM CEO Ben Smith has released the following statement about the company’s interest in TAP:

“We value what TAP has built over the last 81 years: a strong Lisbon hub, a strong brand, and a unique value proposition that provides connectivity and pride to millions of Portuguese people. We firmly believe that the next chapter of the airline’s history should be written as part of the Air France-KLM Group, building on this legacy and taking TAP to the next level. TAP is a natural fit within Air France-KLM’s multi-hub strategy, and our ambition is to strengthen the operations at Lisbon while developing connectivity in other cities across the country including Porto. We look forward to the next steps of the privatization process.”

So, what happens from here? Parpublica, which handles the bidding, now has 30 days to prepare a report on each proposal’s merits, for the government. It will then select the most suitable non-binding offers, and invite those bidders to submit binding proposals within 90 days.

TAP offers strategic value for all three airline groups

Bottom line

The government of Portugal is once again looking to privatize TAP Air Portugal, initially hoping to sell a 44.9% stake (with an additional 5% going to employees), but the government is open to giving up majority control over time. While the goal of privatization has been there for a long time, it sounds like serious efforts are once again ramping up.

While all three major European airline groups had expressed interest in this deal, both Air France-KLM and Lufthansa Group have submitted non-binding offers before the deadline. They have a lot to gain in terms of synergies, so let’s see how this plays out.

How do you see TAP’s privatization plans evolving?

Conversations (32)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. joe johnson Guest

    THANK GOD. my mother's portuguese and I go often to portugal and while the country and lisboa are my heart and soul, I loathe TAP. if anything goes wrong its the absolute worst place to get fast results and when those happen, it just sucks. this should make customer service especially for foreigners used to more robust systems, much better. I wonder if this will expedite the new airport to be built the country desperately...

    THANK GOD. my mother's portuguese and I go often to portugal and while the country and lisboa are my heart and soul, I loathe TAP. if anything goes wrong its the absolute worst place to get fast results and when those happen, it just sucks. this should make customer service especially for foreigners used to more robust systems, much better. I wonder if this will expedite the new airport to be built the country desperately needs so it can maximize all the heavy tourists it gets now. and make it easier to get there. TAP could even expand more to other cities like DFW. I see this as only good news. their airport, while its nice and u should see how it was in 90s and 80s, its still a massive parking lot 15 min bus ride away from most gates pre boarding, I mean I was shocked to see sooooo many planes have to bc they dont have enough gate capacity to handle remotely the traffic now, although ive never had issues with efficiency of lines or anything, just TAP BS. why I try to avoid them unless its a simple flight. win for locals and tourists, the city and country so I hope something comes around. the potential for at least double the capacity is there in lovely portugal, so this can help them reach it. mazel!

  2. Watson Diamond

    Hopefully whoever does take over will start by making LIS less of a sh*tshow. I've never had an on-time departure from that airport.

    1. Throwawayname Guest

      In my experience, on-time performance isn't a huge issue, but they need to expand the terminal as it always seems to be bus regardless of whether you're flying an Embraer, A330, or anything in between.

    2. Throwawayname Guest

      *always seems to be bus boarding

    3. rrapynot Guest

      I’ve had 6 arrivals and departures at Lisbon in the last 3 months. 3 out of 6 involved buses.

    4. Joe Johnson Guest

      they cant theyre at their ultimate max and I agree, they are supposed to build a huge airport on other side of Golden Gate Bridge replica in Christo area which is also not bad to come into city and then keep this one as a local EU airport or turn it into housing, its literally in city - lisboa is tiny area wise - so not sure where they are on that.

    5. Brutus Member

      That’s exactly the point. LIS is at maximum capacity. After five decades of false starts the government finally announced in May 2024 that the new Luís de Camões Airport, 40 km from downtown Lisbon, would be located in current site of the Field Firing Range of Alcochete and should be ready in 2034.
      Until then I would not expect much investment into the current airport infrastructure.

  3. Justsaying Guest

    Lufthansa is the more suitable option imo and fits way better.

    1. VladG Diamond

      How so? LH already has a Southern European airline to cover South America (ITA) - AF-KLM does not.

    2. Brutus Member

      I don’t think ITA has a strong presence in Ceentral/South America with a mere three destinations (EZE, GIG and GRU) in all of South America. LH alone has nearly twice as many (EZE, GIG, GRU, BOG, SJO).

  4. BP Guest

    Oh please, let it not be LH group...

    1. bossa Guest

      Agreed, LHG has ruined enough airlines already!

  5. Julia Guest

    Why is it necessary for TAP to be sold off? Aren't they doing fine as is today?

    1. Throwawayname Guest

      The airline business is very complicated, and it doesn't get any easier when politics are involved. Then you have the EU and its strict rules around competition, emergency funding etc- it's not hard to see why the government don't want to be too close to the airline.

    2. Nate Guest

      Because govt ownership isn't capitalism, except when it is.

    3. joe johnson Guest

      no this is great. their govt cant truly get it to peak potential so this will expedite it and hopefully the new airport. theres simply no land and its very close to city, which is awesome but if they want to maximize they need the massive new airport just a bit further away but not bad at all either. having driven all over 100x over, Lisbon is so tiny and easy to get around.

  6. AceQuik Guest

    If we have to see more consolidation, I’d prefer to see AF-KLM get it. LHG has bought up enough European airlines, and there’s probably a better chance of TAP not being completely neglected with AF-KLM.

    1. Brutus Member

      I have no issues with any of the airlines in the LH Group, but looking at the home countries of the group’s member airlines this group has created a formidable block (nine Star Alliance members in Europe, four of which are in the LH Group) right in the middle of Europe. Members consist of the principal Belgian, German, Swiss, Austrian and now Italian carriers.
      It may be an equally formidable hurdle for the LH...

      I have no issues with any of the airlines in the LH Group, but looking at the home countries of the group’s member airlines this group has created a formidable block (nine Star Alliance members in Europe, four of which are in the LH Group) right in the middle of Europe. Members consist of the principal Belgian, German, Swiss, Austrian and now Italian carriers.
      It may be an equally formidable hurdle for the LH Group to get regulatory EU approval for another carrier to be included.

      By comparison, it may be easier to get an approval for a TP affiliation with the Air France-KLM Group (7 European SkyTeam members, of which two are in the Air France KLM Group), even if it should mean that TP may have to switch their alliance from Star to SkyTeam.

    2. Brutus Member

      Correction;

      …five of which are in the LH Group…

  7. E39 Diamond

    I believe LHG is the best option. The Star alliance network is vastly superior, so if I was a TAP elite I would definitely root for LHG and not Skycrap

    1. VladG Diamond

      If the *A network is so superior, why do you need TP?

    2. E39 Diamond

      So it can become even more superior

  8. phil Guest

    If TPA is sold to LH, that is one fewer airline we cannot depend on during LH's frequent strikes. For Canadians, that would pretty much leaves AC in the Star Alliance group or UA via the USA, which is certainly something most Canadians do not want to travel to anytime soon

    1. Brett Guest

      Oh America is so bad and dangerous and evil.

      Good god you virtue signaling Canadians are exhausting at best. Go air your grievances about more serious world affairs or some of your own issues at home.

    2. harry12345 Member

      This kind of reaction is exactly why mr phil made his comment

    3. Jason Guest

      Well, Brett, at the moment, America *IS* "so bad and dangerous and evil." Regardless of your political point-of-view, there is no denying that tourism to the US is down dramatically; that ICE has killed people in the streets and detained and deported American citizens; and we are involved in fighting an undeclared war that we cannot win, that gasoline prices are skyrocketing, and inflation is back up above 4 percent...

      ("Other than that, how'd you...

      Well, Brett, at the moment, America *IS* "so bad and dangerous and evil." Regardless of your political point-of-view, there is no denying that tourism to the US is down dramatically; that ICE has killed people in the streets and detained and deported American citizens; and we are involved in fighting an undeclared war that we cannot win, that gasoline prices are skyrocketing, and inflation is back up above 4 percent...

      ("Other than that, how'd you enjoy the play, Mrs. Lincoln?")

  9. Throwawayname Guest

    I hope that both bids end up failing. The European consumer doesn't have anything to gain from the consolidation. LHG already own five flag carriers and there's an intercontinental Skyteam hub barely 500 miles from LIS/OPO.

    Beyond their excellent Brazilian network, TAP are a really useful option for regional travel to the Iberian Peninsula and North/West Africa, particularly since LHG and AFKL palm flights to places like FAO, ACE, and RAK off to Transavia...

    I hope that both bids end up failing. The European consumer doesn't have anything to gain from the consolidation. LHG already own five flag carriers and there's an intercontinental Skyteam hub barely 500 miles from LIS/OPO.

    Beyond their excellent Brazilian network, TAP are a really useful option for regional travel to the Iberian Peninsula and North/West Africa, particularly since LHG and AFKL palm flights to places like FAO, ACE, and RAK off to Transavia and Discover. It would be a shame to have that connectivity undermined.

  10. Parnel Guest

    It would be a real loss if TAP is bought up by anyone, they offer amazing prices to Portugal, especially in Business class.
    Losing TAP with hurt the tourist business in Portugal

  11. Jim Guest

    One has to imagine that Carsten Spohr is very interested in Portuguese average wages, which are less than half those of Germany.

    1. Brutus Member

      KLM and Air France don’t do a shabby job of connecting passengers from Canada through their respective hubs with Portugal. KLM tends to have reasonable fares and the connecting times in CDG are sometimes tighter than I’m comfortable with.
      So, KLM it is…

      B.

      I have used KLM a few times when I didn’t want to depend on US carriers or AC.

  12. Andrew Guest

    Hope whatever happens prices don’t go up much on TAP. It’s a great airline for the value and it’s business class checks all the boxes.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Throwawayname Guest

I hope that both bids end up failing. The European consumer doesn't have anything to gain from the consolidation. LHG already own five flag carriers and there's an intercontinental Skyteam hub barely 500 miles from LIS/OPO. Beyond their excellent Brazilian network, TAP are a really useful option for regional travel to the Iberian Peninsula and North/West Africa, particularly since LHG and AFKL palm flights to places like FAO, ACE, and RAK off to Transavia and Discover. It would be a shame to have that connectivity undermined.

2
harry12345 Member

This kind of reaction is exactly why mr phil made his comment

1
AceQuik Guest

If we have to see more consolidation, I’d prefer to see AF-KLM get it. LHG has bought up enough European airlines, and there’s probably a better chance of TAP not being completely neglected with AF-KLM.

1
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published