Yikes: Ryanair Boeing 737 Comes Dangerously Close To Running Out Of Fuel

Flights sometimes take longer than planned, and that’s why airlines always have fuel reserves, planned diversion points, etc. The aviation industry operates with an incredible focus on having a safety margin, but sometimes things don’t go as planned. Along those lines, a Ryanair flight recently had what can only be described as a very close call.

Ryanair flight has incredibly stressful 110-minute diversion

The Aviation Herald has the story of what happened on Friday, October 3, 2025, involving Ryanair flight FR3418. The flight was operated by a Malta Air (Ryanair subsidiary) Boeing 737-800 with the registration code 9H-QBD, and it was scheduled to operate from Pisa, Italy (PSA), to Prestwick, Scotland (PIK).

Long story short, the plane landed way below minimum fuel, but there’s a lot more to the story. This all happened during Storm Amy, which saw winds approaching 100 miles per hour in many parts of England. So here’s how this played out:

  • The plane was supposed to land on runway 20 at Prestwick, but had to perform a go around due to weather
  • The aircraft then entered a holding pattern, and then attempted another landing on the same runway around 30 minutes after the initial landing attempt, but had to perform a go around again
  • The aircraft then entered another holding pattern, and 10 minutes later, the crew decided to divert to Edinburgh (EDI)
  • The aircraft attempted to land on runway 24 at Edinburgh around 60 minutes after the initial go around, but had to go around again
  • The aircraft then diverted to Manchester (MAN), where the aircraft finally landed around 110 minutes after the initial go around

In the end, the plane was in the air for a total of 4hr23min, which is way longer than the typical 2hr20min journey for this 1,054-mile flight.

Talk about a challenging situation!

It’s being reported that the plane landed with a total of 220 kilograms of fuel remaining, with 100 kilograms in the left engine, and 120 kilograms in the right engine. For what it’s worth, the plane’s overall fuel capacity is around 21,000 kilograms, so its available fuel at the time of landing was just over 1% of the total capacity.

The Air Accidents Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is now reviewing the incident. In a statement, Ryanair claims that it has “reported this to the relevant authorities,” and “as this is now subject of an ongoing investigation, which we are cooperating fully with, we are unable to comment.”

This incident was minutes from being a disaster

With just 220 kilograms of fuel remaining, this flight was maybe five minutes from running out of fuel. The amount of time remaining might have actually been much smaller than that, given that a go around can burn a lot more fuel, with the engines spooling up.

So this was a very, very close call, and in aviation, you certainly don’t hope to find yourself in a situation where you basically have one shot at a landing. I can’t imagine how stressed the pilots must have been about the landing in Manchester.

Just for some context on how serious this was, an aircraft would usually declare a fuel emergency when a flight is predicted to land with less than its mandated final reserve fuel, which is typically sufficient for 30 minutes of flight time. So what happened here was way beyond just being a fuel emergency.

None of us were there, so it’s hard to know where this all went wrong, but I’m sure an investigation will reveal all those details. Obviously a flight should never get to the point where it has just minutes of fuel remaining. However, what should’ve been done differently? Should more fuel have been loaded, should the pilots have mad the decision to divert earlier, or what?

A Ryanair Boeing 737 came close to running out of fuel

Bottom line

A Ryanair Boeing 737 came within minutes of running out of fuel, after it had to fly for an additional 110 minutes after performing its first go around. This incident happened during a storm, as the plane was first scheduled to land in Prestwick, then the decision was made to divert to Edinburgh, and then the decision was made to divert to Manchester.

Fortunately the plane landed safely in the end, but with just 220 kilograms of fuel remaining, they had only minutes to spare.

What do you make of this Ryanair close call?

Conversations (41)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

David Howell Guest

And this is why storms can cause preemptive flight cancellations - to prevent the risk of exactly this happening. Of course Ryanair were the ones flying into a storm and evidently being overly determined to land at the scheduled airport. Dislocated planes and crew cause costs, and it's their entire MO to reduce those as far as possible... And, apparently, further.

0
‼ 0
Miles Guest

AAIB is Air Accident Investigation Branch (not Bureau).

0
‼ 0
PsychedelicGoat Guest

Several years ago I read Ryanair always flew with minimal fuel for cost efficiency reasons ( weight of fuel etc) . If one googles you will see articles criticizing this airline for this. One day it will be a real disaster for reasons like this I suppose. I still fly them because they’ve never had an incident yet and cheap for a short flight.

0
‼ 0
BLS777 Guest

When in holding check your alternate weather. They left holding then; 1. visually checked their alternate then 2. Declared fuel emergency then 3. easy straight in to Manchester. The luck of the Irish saved the poor planning!!!

0
‼ 0
Guytp Guest

I live in Edinburgh and drove to Glasgow in the midst of this storm on Friday night. The wind and rain were bad but the gusts were utterly insane. Had several moments where staying in lane on the motorway took all my physical strength as the car was just being pushed horizontally 2-3m at a time. I’d stab a guess the gusts were just insane here. That being said gusts up to 100mph were advised 4 days in advance so it shouldn’t have been a surprise. In terms of questions of diversion airport id suggest MAN was selected as it was outside the storm path and other northern airports risks another go around and then no forth option. Fuel to land and go around is way higher than during flight. That said. Squeaky bum time.

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published