New Zealand Nearly Triples Tourist Tax For International Visitors

Visiting New Zealand is about to get more expensive, as the country is drastically increasing the fee it charges international visitors…

New Zealand international visitor levy increasing to 100 NZD

New Zealand requires visitors from visa waiver countries to apply for an Electronic Travel Authority (ETA) prior to travel, as is the case with many countries around the world. Not only does applying for the ETA incur a fee, but the country also charges an International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy (IVL), which is intended “to ensure visitors contribute to public services and high-quality experiences while visiting New Zealand.”

The IVL was first introduced in July 2019, and costs 35 NZD (~22 USD) per visitor. The cost of this is about to increase drastically — as of October 1, 2024, New Zealand’s IVL will increase to 100 NZD (~66 USD) per visitor, so that means it’s nearly tripling. Here’s how the country justifies this move:

“The Government is serious about enabling the tourism sector to grow as part of our overall goal of doubling exports in 10 years. International tourism plays a hugely important role in the New Zealand economy, with international visitors spending over $11 billion in the year ending March 2024.”

“But international tourism also comes with costs to local communities, including additional pressure on regional infrastructure and higher upkeep and maintenance costs across our conservation estate. The IVL was introduced in 2019 as a mechanism to ensure international visitors were contributing directly to these costs, the vast majority of which are paid for by New Zealand taxpayers and ratepayers.”

“A $100 IVL would generally make up less than 3 per cent of the total spending for an international visitor while in New Zealand, meaning it is unlikely to have a significant impact on visitor numbers. Increasing the IVL means we can continue to grow international tourism to support economic growth while ensuring international visitors contribute to high-value conservation areas and projects, such as supporting biodiversity in national parks and other highly visited areas and improving visitor experiences on public conservation land.”

New Zealand is a gorgeous country

My take on New Zealand increasing its visitor fee

In general, I of course prefer that countries have as few barriers to tourism as possible. The more of a headache and the more costly it is to visit a destination, the less appealing it is to many prospective travelers. That being said, I suspect New Zealand will have no issues getting away with this.

For one, New Zealand is a fairly high-end tourist destination. It’s not Bali or Phuket, as most people traveling to New Zealand aren’t just looking for a cheap way to party. New Zealand has so much natural beauty, and there’s no country quite like it.

If the international visitor levy is actually used for the purposes claimed — to ensure visitors contribute to public services — then I think that’s fair enough. However, is that actually how the money ends up getting spent? I dunno…

As you’d expect, the country’s tourism association opposes these changes, claiming that “New Zealand’s tourism recovery is falling behind the rest of the world, and this will further dent our global competitiveness.”

Keep in mind the tourism levy was only introduced in the middle of 2019, and months later, the world shut down due to the pandemic. New Zealand’s borders stayed closed longer than just about anywhere else in the world, so New Zealand is definitely a bit behind when it comes to its recovery.

Currently New Zealand’s tourism numbers are about 80% of what they were pre-pandemic, while tourism spending is about 95% of what it was pre-pandemic.

New Zealand tourism numbers haven’t recovered

Bottom line

Visiting New Zealand is about to get more expensive. In addition to needing an Electronic Travel Authority (ETA), visitors also need to pay an International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy (IVL). As of October 2024, the cost of this will increase from 35 NZD to 100 NZD.

While that’s a drastic increase, I doubt this will materially impact the number of visitors who choose to travel to the country, given the type of visitors that New Zealand gets. Then again, if New Zealand has the goal of drastically increasing tourism spending, then I don’t think this will help…

What do you make of New Zealand’s new tourism levy?

Conversations (63)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Bob Wong Guest

New Zealand's economy is really struggling (do you all even know this?), so this is how they come up with tax revenue. Makes sense, I don't see why everyone is complaining.

0
‼ 0
billb303 Member

This may affect how many Aussies pop over for a weekend trip but will affect 0 people coming from the states. If an extra $35 is going to stop you, then you really had no intention of going in the first place! As for how the money is used, that's up to NZ. You hope it will be used to fund tourist related infrastructure maintenance but, if not, oh well. Leaving NZ on my bucket list.

0
‼ 0
Xal Guest

I think first countries should stop this electronic authorization crap. Either to enter country you need visa or not. Earlier eta was suppose to be just login and let government know someone is entering country but no or very less fees. As far spending this money on tourism I doubt last year during my visit saw many trails in the parks both in south and north islands were closed, some more than one year waiting for repair and no one is working.

0
‼ 0
Dave W. Guest

This is the kind of tax governments love: the ones paying the tax have zero votes. Still, a US$62 hit won't affect many. And, for those of us who visit annually, you pay that only every other year.

0
‼ 0
Jerry Diamond

I'm curious if this has the potential to have some fallout for NZ passport holders. Many visa-free agreements are predicated on reciprocity. Officially, the ESTA program allows fees to be charged by reciprocal countries, only if they are nominal and cover actual costs. By charging this tax, NZ seems to be out of compliance for ESTA

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published