Maldives Bans Israeli Passport Holders, With Extreme New Law

The Maldives has just introduced what’s sure to be a controversial new travel ban. While the country has been working on introducing this for nearly a year, it has now been signed into law.

Maldives bans Israelis, in solidarity with Palestine

Mohamed Muizzu, the President of the Maldives, has just signed into law an amendment to the Immigration Act, which expressly prohibits entry into the country using Israeli passports. Note that this ban doesn’t apply to dual nationals, so this new restriction is specifically about which passport you use to enter the country, and not about whether you have an Israeli passport or not.

While the Maldives and Israel haven’t had diplomatic relations since the 1970s, travel has been permitted up until this point. The government states that these restrictions will remain in place until Israel halts its “actions” against Palestinians.

The press release from the government provides the following justification:

The ratification reflects the Government’s firm stance in response to the continuing atrocities and ongoing acts of genocide committed by Israel against the Palestinian people.

The Government of Maldives reaffirms its resolute solidarity with the Palestinian cause and its enduring commitment to the promotion and protection of the rights of the Palestinian people. The Maldives continues to advocate for accountability for violations of international law and remains vocal across various international platforms in its condemnation of Israel’s actions.

President Dr Muizzu has consistently reiterated the Maldives’ principled support for the establishment of an independent and sovereign State of Palestine, based on the pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, in accordance with relevant United Nations resolutions and international legal norms.

The government first announced its plans to introduce such a travel ban in June 2024, but the actual implementation has been quite drawn out. For what it’s worth, in 2023, just under 11,000 visitors entered the Maldives with Israeli passports, representing around 0.6% of the total number of visitors to the country. The country saw a steep decline in Israeli visitors in 2024.

It’s worth acknowledging that there are probably many people who have Israeli passports who enter the country with other passports, so I imagine the total number of visitors who also have an Israeli passport is significantly higher. Furthermore, I suspect many Jewish people with other passports will reconsider a trip to the Maldives in light of this policy.

The Maldives has banned Israeli passport holders

My take on the Maldives banning Israeli passports

It goes without saying that the current Israel and Gaza conflict couldn’t be more polarizing. I find the dialogue surrounding it to be consistently disappointing, since people are just talking past one another.

The way I view it, multiple things can be true. Yes, Israel had a horrible terrorist attack committed against it on October 7, 2023, and Hamas is a terrorist organization. But it’s also tragic how many people have died in Gaza, particularly women and children, and it’s fair to question whether the military operation over the past 18+ months has been the path that minimizes the loss of life, and creates as prosperous of an outcome for all as possible.

With that in mind, I’ll just say a few things:

  • I’ve always been opposed to travel bans based solely on which passport someone uses to enter a country; “punishing” ordinary citizens for the actions of a government just seems juvenile
  • The Maldives is heavily reliant on tourism, which is why the country has compromised so much on its religious “morals,” by allowing alcohol and much more at resorts; it’s interesting that this is the place where the country draws the line
  • This won’t be good for the Maldives’ tourism, as I’m sure the country will see more than a 0.6% reduction in tourism, as Jewish people with other passports avoid the country as well
  • This kind of seems silly, since the only thing this will accomplish is reducing the Maldives’ own tourism revenue (which, in turn, could be used to support to Palestinians, if that was the goal); it’s not like this is what’s going to lead to a major revolt against Netanyahu
  • The irony here is that many Israeli passport holders are Muslim; now, those aren’t necessarily the people visiting the Maldives, but it seems strange to ban them
  • If the Maldives wanted to introduce such a policy, it seems like this should’ve happened some time back
This entry ban is only going to hurt the Maldives

Bottom line

The Maldives has introduced a new entry ban, whereby Israeli passports can no longer be used to enter the country. This has been under consideration since June 2024, but has now finally been implemented. I’ve always been opposed to travel bans that punish ordinary citizens for the actions of a government, and this is no different.

What do you make of the Maldives banning entry with Israeli passports?

Conversations (138)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Thrawn Guest

Israel is doing the worst job ever with their "genocide". When the Turks did it to the Armenians there have been a lot less Armenians afterwards. When Hitler did it to the Jews there have been 6 million less Jews afterwards. (add any other genocide in history) But the population of the Palestinians TRIPLED since 1995. Insane terrorist supporting comments here. Can't imagine how delusional you have to be to ignore hard facts like that.

0
‼ 0
IntheNameOfPeace Guest

Extreme??? Bombing populated areas including hospitals, schools, cutting off water, medical supplies and food and promoting expulsion of people of the land is considered "fair". unfortunate word selection Ben

1
‼ 0
Darren C Diamond

Why are some travel vloggers obsessed with visiting the Maldives? After watching travel videos pushing the Maldives, my wife didn't see the appeal. There are so many more appealing destinations.

1
‼ 0
globetrotter Guest

Here are my rebuttals to the commonly misconceptions and propagandas that permeate on topic of Israelis-Palestinians conflicts. 1. The concept of "self-defense" describes one sovereign state fights against the stronger and wealthier invading sovereign state. A current typical example is Ukraine vs Russia. It does not apply to Israel because Israel controls the Palestinian occupied territories since its 1948 independence. It is a case of a sovereign state vs a non state actor who takes up armed resistance striving for its own independent state. 2. "From the river to the sea": Israel is a nuclear state that is backed by the US with absolute impunity, the best advanced weaponry and capital bankrolled by US government. Palestinians are impoverished and deeply fractured Bedouins who killed each other and other Shia and Sunni Muslims. When we look at photos of Jerusalem/ Tel Aviv vs West Bank/ Gaza, it is indisputable that genocide and annihilation describe Palestinian territories full of piles of rubbles throughout. 3. Palestinian terrorists murdered more westerners than we killed them: Bush Jr. and Biden led both wars that claimed over a million deaths of Muslims. 4. The west is the beacon of democracy and law of order of the world: Many European powers make a mockery of the rulings of the ICJ and ICC. Note that the US is not a signatory of both organizations. NYT was outed for hiring an Israeli female spy to cook up the story of rapes to galvanize public outrage against Hamas. The attack was an amphibious strategy that left no spare time to commit such crime. CNN was criticized for reporting baseless account of babies murders. They both lack credibility and integrity when it comes to topic of Palestinians-Israelis conflicts. To understand the conflicts you must seek outside US/ western news sources. Other independent US news such as Vox and the Intercept are worthwhile to read but not match Aljazeera. Before anyone itches to bitch about Qatar, here are facts to digest: It hosts the biggest US military base in the region; it provides accommodation to Hamas leaders at CIA request to monitor their movements; its Aljazeera news exposes "the skeletons in the closet "of the Saudi and Emirati monarchies; and it was approved for the US visa waive program as of last November. It enriches my knowledge in world histories prior to WWII. I always believe that the conflicts and Gazan war are religious motivated. Abrahamic faiths gave birth to Judaism, Islam and Christianity. The three religions are not cousins but eternal enemies and that make the conflicts so deadly, violent and twisted. I highly recommend watching and reading the following articles on Aljazeera. 1. Praying for Armageddon Part I and Part II: The roots cause of the Gazan war and its continuing savagery and barbarism. 2. Democracy does not exist in the US: Chris Hedges was a war correspondent for NYT who stationed in Israel and was a Baptist pastor. He is the most knowledgeable journalist of the conflict. 3. 9/11-- was there an alternative: This is a supplementary reading that is fascinating and educational. The above three documentaries target three groups of audience. First, those who use their heads to synthesize and analyze the info. Second, those who use their hearts to refute and dismiss the info. Third, those who require more data and info but are still indecisive are called "analysis paralysis". The first documentary is not for the faint of heart and no US news outlet dares to broadcast it.

2
‼ 0
KW Guest

How much did Ben Gvir and Smortich pay you to write this Hasbara drivel, Ben?

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT