Oops: LATAM Airbus A320 Nearly Lands At Wrong Airport

Oops: LATAM Airbus A320 Nearly Lands At Wrong Airport

13

A LATAM Airbus A320 operating a flight in Brazil nearly landed at the wrong airport, in a completely different city, as reported by The Aviation Herald (and thanks to reader Carlos for flagging this). How could that happen?

LATAM A320 attempts to land at wrong airport

This incident occurred on Tuesday, November 14, 2023, and involves a 16-year-old LATAM Airbus A320 with the registration code PR-MHM. The jet was scheduled to operate flight LA4640, the short 260-mile domestic flight from Sao Paulo (GRU) to Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (SJP). However, as you might notice from looking at the map of the flight, the aircraft had a rather unusual path.

Flight path for LATAM flight LA4640

While on approach to Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, the pilots reported a GPS mismatch (meaning the info on their GPS didn’t match up with what they were expecting). The pilots informed the Sao Jose air traffic controller that they were beginning their RNAV approach procedures for the airport (RNAV stands for “area navigation,” and it’s a type of approach procedure using instruments).

Given the distance from the airport, the Sao Jose air traffic controller told the pilots to contact the approach frequency. However, the crew didn’t do that, and instead called the Sao Jose air traffic controller again, informing that they were doing a 360 degree turn to descend and lose altitude.

The controller again told the pilots to contact the approach frequency, but the pilots declined, stating they were busy with the approach and had the airport in sight.

As it turns out, they were approaching the completely wrong airport. They were actually lining up to land at Catanduva Aerodrome, located in a completely different city. Furthermore, the airport they were lining up at was only a small general aviation airport, and not a commercial airport. While the runway at their intended destination was 5,381 feet long, the runway they were lining up with was only 3,232 feet long. The two airports are around 60km apart.

At this point the air traffic controller advised that they were approaching the wrong airport. At an altitude of 1,000 feet above ground level, the pilots finally initiated a go around, and flew to the correct airport, where it landed without further incident, around 15 minutes later.

Flight path for LATAM flight

How could pilots almost land at the wrong airport?

It’s rather alarming when two commercial airline pilots almost land a jet full of passengers at the wrong airport, quite a distance from their intended destination. How could something like this happen? I’m sure an investigation will be performed, but here are a few thoughts, based on the communication and the flight path:

  • While the cities are quite a distance apart, the general airport orientations seem to be similar, and the runways at the two airports are at a similar angle, so visually I can see how pilots might have gotten confused, if they ignored all other hints
  • It sure seems like the pilots got visual of the Catanduva Aerodrome, assumed it was their destination airport, and then just had confirmation bias the entire way down, ignoring all the signs that something may be wrong
  • Presumably the pilots were confused, but rather than stepping back and considering the situation, they were frazzled overworked, and doubled down, as they performed a 360 degree turn to lose altitude, and assumed the GPS mismatch was due to some technical error, rather than due to their own mistake; they even refused to switch frequencies, claiming they were too busy

Every once in a while there’s a story about pilots nearly landing on a taxiway rather than a runway, or landing at an airport nearby to their intended destination. However, this has to be one of the most extreme stories we’ve seen, as these two cities aren’t even that close to one another.

Bottom line

Earlier this week, a LATAM Airbus A320 operating a short flight nearly landed at the wrong airport. The pilots lined up to land at an airport about 60km from their intended destination, and only executed a go around 1,000 feet above the ground.

This is a pretty rough mistake all-around, when you consider how many signs were clearly ignored for something like this to happen. At least this was caught before the plane touched down, because there could’ve been a very different ending, given the runway length.

What do you make of this LATAM A320 incident?

Conversations (13)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Al Guest

    The clip of the ATC recordings you posted has them speaking not in English. I thought all ATC communications were in English globally?

    1. Francisco Luz Guest

      not for domestic flights. ATC comms are in english only when there are international flights, AFAIK

  2. Andy Diamond

    That reminds me of a PanAm flight from LHR to SFO I did as a kid. I had the habit to ask the pilots after landing, if I could have the flight map for collection purposes. Then, they usually had a map on which they circled the ways points and destination airport, noting down the relevant frequencies etc. Also the PanAm captain was happy to share ... but when I analyzed it later in the...

    That reminds me of a PanAm flight from LHR to SFO I did as a kid. I had the habit to ask the pilots after landing, if I could have the flight map for collection purposes. Then, they usually had a map on which they circled the ways points and destination airport, noting down the relevant frequencies etc. Also the PanAm captain was happy to share ... but when I analyzed it later in the hotel, I found out that they planned for LHR to SJC ... the initial way points made sense for SFO, but the final ones were clearly for SJC!

  3. Smokie Guest

    Another pilot error who double down by ignoring technology warnings.
    It's time to let machines handle the flying.

  4. JL Guest

    This one is quite famous.

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1991-12-23-9104250064-story.html

    1. Sigmund New Member

      25 + years ago an airliner bound for RAP landed instead seven miles beyond at Ellsworth AFB. They mistook 13,500 ft rwy 31 for 8,700 ft 32.

      Fabricated CVR: "Nice landing, let's find our gate. Hey, why are all those B-52s here at the municipal airport??"

      (brief pause)

      "Oh, crap!"

    2. David Guest

      Thanks. Very little info online but here is a photo of the plane on small runway.

      https://www.facebook.com/462295373890306/posts/690987141021127/

  5. Maryland Guest

    " they ignored the other hints"
    Let me make an assumption, two guys refuse to ask for directions.

  6. George Guest

    Just to point out that SJP airport is within the city (surrounded by houses and building complex) whereas the Catanduva Airport isn’t.
    Clearly a hookie mistake which could have had major implications

    Catanduva could be translated as “Pickingrape” lol

  7. James S Guest

    Frazzled and overworked, maybe - but if you've spent any meaningful time around Brazilians, you know that admitting mistakes is simply not a cultural norm. Delightful country with friendly people, but they can be obstinate to the point of lunacy. As noted above, read about the Varig 254 flight in 1989.

  8. Jason Guest

    Reminds me of the Varig 254 incident from
    1989 or so. Look it up. That was worse but similar

    1. NateNate Member

      Wow -- interesting story. I was very surprised at this line from Wikipedia: "passengers without fastened seatbelts were flung to the front of the airplane". If your plane is about to crash land in the jungle, there really is no excuse not to have your seatbelt on.

    2. David Guest

      I read that too Nate. I mean stupidity doesn't go far enough. It was a miracle only 12 people died whilst plane was hoovering over the Amazon canopy.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

NateNate Member

Wow -- interesting story. I was very surprised at this line from Wikipedia: "passengers without fastened seatbelts were flung to the front of the airplane". If your plane is about to crash land in the jungle, there really is no excuse not to have your seatbelt on.

1
Jason Guest

Reminds me of the Varig 254 incident from 1989 or so. Look it up. That was worse but similar

1
David Guest

Thanks. Very little info online but here is a photo of the plane on small runway. https://www.facebook.com/462295373890306/posts/690987141021127/

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,163,247 Miles Traveled

32,614,600 Words Written

35,045 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT
  • December 15, 2023
  • Ben Schlappig
13
Which LATAM Planes Have New Business Class?
  • June 16, 2023
  • Ben Schlappig
12
LATAM Launching Lima To Atlanta Flights