I can’t say I’m terribly surprised, but Hawaiian Airlines will be canceling one of its longer domestic flights, as reported by Ishrion Aviation.
In this post:
Hawaiian Airlines cuts Honolulu to Austin flights as of March 2025
As of March 26, 2025, Hawaiian Airlines will cancel its flight between Honolulu (HNL) and Austin (AUS), which currently operates 2-3x weekly. For context, the flight is operated by an Airbus A330-200 with the following schedule:
HA94 Honolulu to Austin departing 8:50AM arriving 9:15PM
HA93 Austin to Honolulu departing 9:15AM arriving 1:05PM
The 3,763-mile flight operates eastbound on Sundays and Thursdays with a block time of 7hr25min, and operates westbound on Mondays and Fridays with a block time of 8hr50min.
This route was announced in late 2020 and was launched in March 2021, during the peak of the pandemic. Around the same time, the airline also launched a route to Orlando, which ended up being cut in 2022. So at least the Austin route lasted for four years.
It’s not a surprise to see the Austin route cut
It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Hawaiian Airlines is cutting Austin service. The route made sense during the peak of the pandemic, when Hawaiian had limited places it could fly its wide body jets, given that so many places in the South Pacific were closed to visitors (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, etc.).
So flying an A330 to Austin (with pretty bad aircraft utilization to boot) was better than just parking it, but that’s about all that can be said. Of course things have evolved quite a bit since then. While flying across the Pacific profitably can still be challenging, every country has reopened to visitors, and demand has been increasing, slowly but steadily.
But arguably what really “killed” this route is Alaska’s takeover of Hawaiian. Alaska Air Group is now able to do its route and fleet planning more centrally, and presumably the airline group has decided that there are more profitable places it can send these wide body jets. That could be in Asia or the South Pacific (with increased feed from Alaska via Honolulu), or it could even be between Honolulu and Alaska hubs in the mainland.
While Alaska Air Group is committed to maintaining a hub in Honolulu, I have to imagine that at some point we’ll see some wide body jets stationed in Seattle. I don’t think it will happen soon, but I’d be shocked if Hawaiian’s 787s don’t eventually fly out of the Pacific Northwest.
I’m sure the Austin route would have survived if it could be operated by a narrow body jet with better economics, but it just doesn’t make much sense with wide body aircraft.
Bottom line
Hawaiian Airlines will discontinue its Honolulu to Austin route as of late March 2025. The route was first launched in early 2021, so it will have operated for around four years. The route made sense when it started, but with the evolution of demand, plus Alaska’s takeover of Hawaiian, this route was bound to be cut sooner rather than later.
What do you make of Hawaiian cutting Austin flights?
I live in Texas and have always flown Hawaiian Air. It is sad that such a great airline is unable to give service to either Dallas or Austin. It makes it more unlikely that vacationers might choose Hawaii over easier destinations and it makes collecting Hawaii Miles or using the associated credit cards unnecessary and unappealing.
I ofter take the nonstop flight to Austin because it is convenient. If Hawaiian Airlines need the wide body for other more popular routes, why not fly a different plane to Austin rather than discontinuing it??
They axed it because there weren't enough people flying on it, why would they continue servicing it?
I wouldn’t be surprised if Delta jumps in and takes over with the 757. It’s about 200 miles shorter than United’s EWR-ARN 757 flight.
Just about all HA long and medium haul aircraft spend the night on the mainland. They also have quite a few crew bases in the lower 48. It also makes maintenance cheaper to do overnight.
HA should fly IAH-HNL and AS should fly IAH-ANC. And, yes, IAH is my home airport. At this moment I am flying AS IAH-SEA-ANC but the oil and gas crowd alone should justify a direct nonstop. Next week I am flying to HNL and would prefer flying on HA.
You seem to be thoroughly confusing "what would be convenient for me" with "what would make any sense whatsoever for them."
Why "should" they do either? Especially against UA, who would surely mount a heavyhanded response to repel them.
HNL-MCO-HNL did not last very long either. Although the only nonstop service on the route, rates from competitors connecting via LAX or SFO were a lot cheaper. Not enough people willing to pay a premium to fly it nonstop.
This is awful news for us. We do this flight about 5 times a year and it is so much easier and comfortable than transferring at LAX or SFO! I guess we'll be flying through SAT via American Airlines now. This is why I was so against the Alaska Air buyout.
AA does not have SAT-HNL
Here in PDX I worry for the A330’s longevity given the AS overlap to HNL and our marginal unique connectivity vs SEA. It’s our only domestic widebody and would be easy for AS to replace with more 737 frequencies.
If only Hawaiian had an A321XLR to make such a route work. And it's not like Alaska is going to brighten up and order any either.
"And it's not like Alaska is going to brighten up and order any either."
Why not? One would have to think that the "Proudly all Boeing" nonsense is as dead as the dodo, since it's now bitten Alaska in the behind multiple times, and there's no way they're going to (or should) muster enough Boeings to completely replace Hawaiian's Airbus fleet any time soon.
I agree that they should get rid of the "Proudly Boeing" mantra. But I don't see it happening based on what happened with their acquisition of Virgin America. Hope I'm wrong, honestly, as Airbus products are clearly outclassing Boeing's offerings at this point.
That was before Boeing's F-ups cost them billions in negative marketing and delayed aircraft.... plus a much smaller fleet to replace.
My guess is "Proudly all Boeing" sticks around for the Alaska brand, but only applies to AS metal, and Hawaiian is its own thing. (Horizon flies Embradiers, for example.)
Utilization had been much better, when I last took this flight in August HNL-AUS was a redeye and the plane turned back around.
However not only was it a widebody, it was a poor-performing route. I've had great luck redeeming partner first class awards (with 5+ seats available at a time).
Which is why weeks ago I wrote that this would be the first Hawaiian flight dropped after the merger https://viewfromthewing.com/the-first-hawaiian-airlines-flight-on-the-chopping-block-after-the-alaska-airlines-merger/
Utilization had been much better, when I last took this flight in August HNL-AUS was a redeye and the plane turned back around.
However not only was it a widebody, it was a poor-performing route. I've had great luck redeeming partner first class awards (with 5+ seats available at a time).
Which is why weeks ago I wrote that this would be the first Hawaiian flight dropped after the merger https://viewfromthewing.com/the-first-hawaiian-airlines-flight-on-the-chopping-block-after-the-alaska-airlines-merger/
ORD-HNL did very well for AA, HA should take a swing...
Where does HA get gates? They can't use AS gates because those gates can't handle widebodies.
Top Dog at Ord, flies HNL Nonstop as well