GlobalX Pilots Struggle To Land Airbus A320 In Phoenix… But Why?!

I often share air traffic control clips of interesting interactions between pilots and air traffic controllers. Well, here’s one that I’m not sure what to make of, because the circumstances are so strange.

GlobalX Airbus A320 unable to land in Phoenix, twice

The excellent VASAviation YouTube channel has uploaded air traffic control audio and a visualization of what happened on the evening of Tuesday, March 4, 2025, at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport (AZA). It centers around GlobalX flight G66136, which was arriving from San Diego (SAN). The flight was operated by a 17-year-old Airbus A320 with the registration code N630VA.

First for some context, GlobalX is a charter airline based in Miami, which was founded in 2018 (at least in its current form). The airline operates a fleet of nearly 20 jets, and it does a lot of contract work for the government, including military charters and even deportation flights. Heck, GlobalX planes were featured in Trump’s cinematic, promotional video about recent deportations.

Anyway, that’s neither here not there. Long story short, the GlobalX A320 seemingly struggled to land in Phoenix, and… we don’t really know why? It’s bizarre, because weather conditions were great, with good visibility and light winds. Despite that, the plane performed two go arounds.

During the first attempt, the plane was cleared to land on runway 12C, but then the pilots informed the tower controller of their intent to go around. When asked for the reason for the go around, the pilot simply stated “unstable.”

The plane was then lined up for a second approach on the same runway, and the pilots once again performed a go around.

While then attempting a third approach, the pilots suddenly started flying the completely wrong heading, without air traffic control permission. While they were supposed to be flying a heading of 120 degrees, they were instead turning to a heading of 360 degrees.

Later on, the pilots claimed to have a “computer problem,” and requested to hold their “present position.” However, for whatever reason, they agreed to continue with the approach, despite their initial hesitation.

This time around, the pilots landed successfully, though not before an Allegiant jet behind them was forced to perform a go around, due to them not making the taxiway turn they were asked to make.

The entire clip is worth watching, as there are a lot more details, and the interaction between the pilot and the controllers is really what makes this so interesting.

For what it’s worth, below is the path that the aircraft flew around Phoenix. Once the plane landed, it stayed on the ground for three days, before operating its next flight. However, I don’t think the plane was taken out of service due to any issues, but instead, GlobalX planes have quite a bit of downtime between trips.

The route for the GlobalX Airbus A320

What is going on with these pilots and/or this plane?

This is such an unusual situation, and I’m not sure what to even make of this. Was there actually some major malfunction with the aircraft? Or was there some minor computer issue, and the pilots just struggled to actually fly the plane in perfect conditions, rather than just programming the computer?

I’m not saying it’s the case here, but I know one of the common complaints about many of the newer pilots nowadays is that they struggle to actually fly the plane, and instead, are just good at working the computers, since training is so heavily centered around that.

A few things stand out here:

  • During the first approach, the plane had a significant decrease in its descent rate on its base leg, as it dropped to 2,500 feet per minute at a low altitude, so I’m not sure if these pilots were just rusty hand flying the plane, or what…
  • The pilots did a really lousy job advocating for themselves, and/or communicating to air traffic controllers what they needed; during the third approach they indicated they needed to extend their downwind or hold, and they sort of got talked into accepting an approach
  • The pilots seemed really distracted throughout, which probably gets at the poor job they did communicating, and advocating for themselves
  • That air traffic controller working P50 W was kind of a jerk, as it should’ve been obvious to him that these pilots were struggling and were working through something, when he almost sarcastically communicated how there were three 10,000 foot runway they should see

I hope the company at least looks into what happened here, because this definitely seems like something out of the ordinary.

Bottom line

Earlier this month, a GlobalX Airbus A320 seemingly struggled to land in Phoenix, despite perfect flying conditions. The pilots requested two go arounds, first claiming an approach was “unstable,” and then claiming there were computer problems. I don’t know what exactly happened here, but it sure is strange…

What do you make of this GlobalX A320 situation in Phoenix?

Conversations (25)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Locks M. Guest

As is typical for US controllers, they ratchet up the drama and editorials increasing the workload for an already stressed crew.

0
‼ 0
Jim Allen Guest

Perhaps the apparent incompetence was deliberate? Maybe they’re doing deportation flights actually had relevance. The crew had accents. Airlines have been known to suffer work slowages in the past. Think about it. Maybe their embarrassment was actually heroics.

0
‼ 0
Miami305 Diamond

LUCKY - You buried part of the lead. 100% the pilots of that plane were iffy at best flying. BUT, ATC... yikes! 3 planes very close together, 1000' apart, climbing/descending, opposite direction... one of them the GlobleX that was having all sorts of trouble following directions/flying the plane. THEN pointing these iffy pilots at VFR AC opposite direction under 1000'. YIKES!

0
‼ 0
Eskimo Guest

While the dinosaurs continue to defend this obsolete practice and we customers have to face the consequences. This would never have happened if a computer was flying. No careless pilot, no missing passports, no drunk pilots, no power trip pilots, no landing at a wrong airport, departing from taxi way, no sick, no DEI blame game, no childish condescending game with other humans (yes you ATC), to name a few. Best of all to those obsessed with 1500 hours. Consider the average 12k planes flying at any given moment. Collectively computers would pass that 1500 hour requirement approximately every 7.5 minutes. Just sayin.

0
‼ 0
FlyerDon Guest

The Airbus is an auto flight aircraft. The autopilot is turned on shortly after takeoff and turned off on short final. When conducting a visual approach you load the instrument approach for the runway as backup. Were they having problems loading the approach or were they trying to shoot a close in visual approach without the aid of an instrument approach and maybe the autopilot? The type of visual approach they were trying to do can be challenging in a commercial size aircraft but as professional pilots they should have been able to do it.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published