Family Denied Marriott Room Due To Check-In Quirk, Forced To Sleep In Car

An OMAAT reader shared a frustrating experience he recently encountered at a Marriott property. People bring all kinds of airline and hotel situations to my attention, and sometimes the travel brand is in the wrong, sometimes the traveler is in the wrong, and sometimes fault lies somewhere in the middle. This is an interesting one, as it’s quite nuanced…

Marriott mobile check-in leads to major issue for family

A Marriott Bonvoy Titanium Elite member recently had an unfortunate situation involving a Marriott property in Nevada. Let me just share the message he sent me:

Recently, my wife, our three-year-old, and I were forced to sleep in our car in Las Vegas after the newly opened dual-branded Element & AC Hotel Symphony Park refused to honor my confirmed reservations. The only reason: I had misplaced my physical plastic credit card.

I had relied on Marriott’s advertised Digital/Mobile Check-In—promoted as a way to skip the front desk—precisely because my ADHD and a traumatic brain injury make it easy for me to misplace physical items. Despite presenting valid government ID and offering multiple secure alternatives (including live verification through the Amex app and an electronic authorization form), the property turned us away.

Marriott corporate later supported the property’s decision even while continuing to advertise mobile and digital check-in as features that eliminate the need to visit the desk. They also denied my Ultimate Reservation Guarantee claim, saying it doesn’t apply in these circumstances—even though the published terms simply require that a confirmed reservation “cannot be honored,” with no exclusion that fits my case.

The human impact was immediate and harsh: my young child and wife slept in our vehicle on a hot Las Vegas night while I repeatedly sought help through every official channel.

This happened at the AC & Element Las Vegas Symphony Park

My take on this unusual denied check-in experience

First of all, I’m sorry to hear about the ADHD and traumatic brain injury, and how that makes it easy to misplace physical items. I’m sure some people will have some things to say about the misplacing of the card, but let’s ignore that and not go there, because I don’t think it’s core to what’s going on here.

I often learn when readers share their experiences with me, and this is no exception. I feel like when I use mobile check-in with Marriott, it rarely works as intended. Often I’m still told to stop by the front desk, and then they’ll swipe my credit card anyway. So my initial reaction was sort of “well, of course you still need a credit card when you show up at a hotel.”

But as I read more of the correspondence between the traveler and Marriott, and the more I looked at Marriott’s website, the more I think he’s right. On Marriott’s website, I don’t see any mention of needing to present a physical card at the property when using mobile check-in.

The thing is, the guest had Apple Pay, and he had a physical ID, but the hotel insisted that a physical card was required. Even an ID along with an electronic payment authorization form wasn’t accepted.

The guest complained to Marriott corporate, and eventually received the following message from the general manager:

I wanted to reach out and follow up with you regarding your most recent stay. I do apologize for not being able to check you in without a physical Creditcard being present at the time of check-in.

At our property we do require a matching id and Creditcard be run through our chip & pin machine at time of check in for every guest. I do sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

Marriott corporate backed the property, and even acknowledged the inconsistency between advertised amenities and operational practices, which is kind of wild:

Following our review, we can confirm that the property acted within its rights in requesting a physical credit card and government-issued identification at check-in. While Digital and Mobile Check-In are offered as conveniences across many Marriott properties, physical verification remains a standard practice at select locations. This measure is in place not only to validate the identity of the cardholder but also to help prevent fraudulent activity and ensure the safety and security of all guests.

We acknowledge the inconsistency between the advertised amenities and the operational practices you encountered. Your observations regarding the conflicting information provided by hotel staff and the challenges this presents for guests relying on digital tools have been shared with our internal teams for further evaluation.

The guest (smartly) responded with the following, in part:

When a company continues to promote a specific feature as an inducement to purchase, knowing it will not be delivered, the question ceases to be one of internal policy and becomes one of deceptive trade practice—an area of consumer-protection law with clear statutory remedies.

To be absolutely clear: I am not asking Marriott to end Digital/Mobile Check-In or to change global marketing.

I am simply asking that advertising at this particular property accurately describe the conditions under which check-in is truly available.

A straightforward edit of the property’s amenity list—removing “Digital Check-In” or clearly stating that a physical card is always required—would resolve the inconsistency and protect both guests and Marriott from the risk of regulatory scrutiny.

The guest also points out how he could use Apple Pay to pay at the on-property restaurant without showing ID, for a bill that was roughly the same cost as a room. But if he actually wanted to check into a room, he needed a physical card.

So while I was on the fence at first, I think this person is 100% right. But more than anything, this is just such awful hospitality. Look, I get a limited service property in Las Vegas might not consider itself to be part of the “hospitality industry,” but think about this for a second.

You have a high tier elite member who performed mobile check-in, had a physical ID, and could pay digitally, and ultimately you denied him a room, so the family (including a small child) ended up sleeping in a car. Even if the hotel has a policy of requiring a physical card, you’d think that sometimes exceptions could be made, both because it’s good business and because it’s part of being a decent person.

When you even have Marriott corporate acknowledging “inconsistency between the advertised amenities and the operational practices you encountered,” but still refusing to do anything, it really sums up the state of Marriott’s approach to service nowadays.

So much for the “hospitality industry”

Bottom line

A family was going to stay at a Marriott property in Las Vegas, and completed mobile check-in. However, when they showed up at the hotel, they still needed to present a physical credit card. That’s right, they didn’t accept a mobile payment, credit card authorization form, or anything else, despite the guest having a valid ID.

With no other options, the family ended up having to sleep in a car. If the hotel wants to have a policy of requiring physical credit cards and not actually allowing mobile check-in without stopping at the front desk, that’s fine. But that should also be clearly disclosed. The lack of decency and common sense shown here is pretty staggering, both on the property level, and on the corporate level.

What do you make of this Marriott check-in mess?

Conversations (389)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Mmp Guest

This situation appears to epitomize Marriott's current lack of interest in providing enhanced customer service. Some Marriotts go the extra mile, but with Marriott's new emphasis on "Owner's first", more properties don't. I have added this hotel to my "no-go" list. However, sleeping in a car in Las Vegas with a one-year-old during the summer is dangerous and reckless. Why the OP chose this option is incomprehensible. It's time to be proactive and have at least one additional credit card, and for the wife to have a credit card in her own name.

0
‼ 0
NoBS Guest

As a Marriott employee I don't work for Element but when a guest uses the mobile check in feature they are only required to provide us a valid I.D and the last 4 digits of that card and we run it. If they request a mobile key and are a repeat guest we run the card on file and send the key before they arrive. First time guest requesting mobile keys are required to stop by the desk to be verified. I just realized I used the mobile check in feature in Arizona and they requested a physical card. So I guess different brands may have different rules but ultimately the situation at hand was insane. If he was capable of filling out a credit card authorization he shouldn't have been denied sometimes its not the brand itself its the person standing there representing the brand.

0
‼ 0
Sista P. Guest

I think that the problem is most hotels today, are not updated with the growing times of a corporate brand. When the Brand grows and changes thier policies, most hotels have not caught up to that growth. It shows that this brand has a lack of internal reviews of the locations carrying the brand name and following the policies set fourth. We have entered a time of Non-human enter action. Unfortunately when we have less contact with other people, it creates less compassion, bad customer service. You can tell by some of the comments being left. "The guys should have had two cc" but if we buy into "Apple Pay" or any digital currency, why carry two cars. Which brings it back to updating policy, and training. The hotel industry is "Hospitality" no matter what brand. Corporate and local locations need to do better.

0
‼ 0
Willie Guest

I booked 3 different hotel rooms for my daughter. I live in Las Vegas, and she was visiting NYC. When she arrived at the 1st hotel in Queens, all the front desk staff requested was the last 4 digits of my CC. When she arrived for her next stay in N Jersey for 3 nights, no CC was requested. On her final night in the NYC Financial District, no CC was requested. I am also a Titanium Elite Lifetime member.

0
‼ 0
Mark Guest

Ben, I would take a different approach in this situation. I recall an article (Travel Weekly I think) where their attorneys discussed the legal aspects of making a reservation using a credit card, as I assume your follower did in this case. My understanding is that booking a room and providing a credit card as a guarantee, forms a legal contract between you and the hotel. If you do not turn up the hotel can then charge your credit card for one nights stay. Conversely, if the hotel does not provide you the room that forms part of your contract with the hotel, they are in breach of that contract and you can sue them in the courts for damages. The hotel does not need a physical credit card in order to charge for the room, it is already pre-authorized, and as the guest had ID, there was no LEGAL justification for not letting them stay the night. No doubt the hotel would claim that it was not their *policy* to allow this. From a contractual perspective I doubt that is true; *policies* do not usurp contract law, however much hotel management teams would like to think they do! My suggestion would be to write a letter to hotel, marked for the attention of their legal department, sent certified mail, threatening to sue for the cost of the room and damages, say a few hundred dollars, for having to spend a night in the car, due to the hotels breach of contract. In the letter state that they have 15 days to respond or you will take them to court. An extra thought is that the hotel might claim you have to use their arbitration. If you use the small claims court this is generally not true. Many courts have held that an arbitration clause in their contracts cannot be used to prevent a claim via the small claims process. It might also be helpful to note that courts will not allow a contract that is so grossly unfair or one-sided that it "shocks the conscience", i.e. it is unconscionable. In this case the traveler had a means of payment, it is highly unlikely that a court would accept a claim from the hotel that "it is against our policy to allow someone to stay the night if they do not have a physical credit card", especially when later events show they are only to happy to accept a digital one. I expect once the hotel's legal team realizes you are serious, they will offer a compensation package. I trust your followers will find these suggestions helpful.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published