EVA Air & Air Canada Planes Nearly Collide On Ground In JFK Runway Mishap

The pilots of an Air Canada Embraer E175 seemingly didn’t understand taxiing instructions (or something), and that almost caused an EVA Air Boeing 777 to run into them at high speeds. Oy…

JFK landing incident close call: “we almost hit them”

YouTube channel You Can See ATC has the details of an incident that happened around 10:30PM on Thursday, March 12, 2026, at New York Kennedy Airport (JFK). This involves two planes that were in sequence to land behind one another, on runway 31R:

  • Air Canada Jazz flight QK898 was operated by an Embraer E175, and was arriving from Montreal (YUL)
  • EVA Air flight BR32 was operated by a Boeing 777-300ER, and was arriving from Taipei (TPE)

When the Air Canada plane clears the runway, it taxies onto taxiways WW and then B, and it holds position there, since it’s waiting for an Aer Lingus plane to get out of the ramp, so it can taxi in for arrival.

The controller anticipates the potential conflict here. WW is a popular taxiway on which to exit the runway, both given its location, and also given that it doesn’t require a 90-degree turn. So the controller already tells the EVA Air pilots they’ll need to exit on V, which is one taxiway further, to avoid any sort of a conflict.

The controller is really on top of things, and also at this point, he tells the Air Canada plane “once EVA Airlines 777 passes you off your nose, you can make two left turns and go into your ramp.” If I’m understanding things correctly, the Air Canada pilot responds “the 777 is off we can taxi,” which is close enough, I guess, or at least conveys the intent.

But this is where it gets bizarre. The EVA Air pilots do exactly what they’re supposed to do, and exit the runway at taxiway V. Yet at exactly the same time, the Air Canada pilots start taxiing, putting themselves on a collision course with the EVA Air 777.

You can hear the yelling then — “Air Canada, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop!” It would appear that these two planes get very close to one another, and since the EVA Air 777 is just landing, it still has some speed. Fortunately the two planes barely miss one another, though as the EVA Air pilot explains, “we come in very, very high speed, we almost hit them.”

Kudos to the JFK controller & EVA Air pilots

Did everyone else notice that the controller on frequency is *that* guy (you know, the one who always gets in fights with everyone), but oddly he’s completely calm in this interaction? Kudos to him! I’m not sure if he has turned over a new leaf, or that he was just so annoyed that he couldn’t even deal.

Anyway, the thing about this guy is that as much as he’s often rather rude, he’s also really good at his job, in terms of noticing everything. He was obviously on top of this situation. And you can tell how annoyed he was by the fact that he didn’t even argue or shout, but instead, just immediately started giving the Air Canada pilot a number for a possible pilot deviation.

I’m really not sure what the Air Canada pilots were thinking here. The controller said they could move once the other plane “passes you off your nose.” They started taxiing exactly when they weren’t supposed to, even though the read back — “the 777 is off we can taxi” — seemed to mostly comprehend what was said.

The Air Canada pilot has a thick accent, but I didn’t get the sense that he wasn’t understanding anything, or that something was lost in translation. But maybe it was? It’s the only logical explanation I can come up with.

Bottom line

An Air Canada Embraer E175 and EVA Air 777 had a very close call at JFK, as they landed right after one another. The controller seemed to realize there could be a potential conflict, so he gave clear instructions for what pilots should do. Yet for whatever reason, the Air Canada pilots did exactly what they weren’t supposed to do, which was to taxi onto a taxiway right as a heavy aircraft was landing.

What do you make of this JFK close call?

Conversations (21)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

JPlat Guest

This is once again our enemies trying to embarrass the US. The sickening thing is that Canada and Taiwan would sacrifice their own people to try and cause an accident in US soil.

0
‼ 0
Nonplussed Guest

A couple of points here: The Air Canada Jazz aircraft is not a mainline Air Canada aircraft, it’s a regional affiliate for Air Canada, much like Envoy is for American and Endeavor is for Delta. This means many of the pilots flying for Jazz are less experienced, much like at Envoy and Endeavor. This reasonable assumption that the crew of the Jazz aircraft being less experienced could have made them interpret the Aer Lingus aircraft as the B-777 that they were to wait for before they could enter the alley for their gate. Not all inexperienced pilots know the difference between an A-330 and a B-777, especially at night. So, when the Aer Lingus aircraft taxied away, the Jazz pilots thought they had permission to move also. As for all this Tim Dunn BS about Canada somehow snuggling up to China, that’s specious reasoning, and completely unfounded. Bottom line: JFK is like many airports worldwide with complex runway/taxiway layouts which require complete attention by both ATC and pilots. And if there is any doubt about an ATC clearance, there is no doubt—don’t move until you understand the instructions.

1
‼ 0
Creditian Guest

JFK needs to redesign the entire airport layouts. Its terminals and taxiways are horribly laid out and posing so much danger to this extreme busy and tight airport.

0
‼ 0
Jack Guest

That’s a joual accent I hear.

0
‼ 0
Smitty Guest

We need to BAN AIR CANADA! After the HUGE INCIDENT in SFO and now this, its time for state 51 to be banned FOREVER.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published