Flight diversions due to medical issues with passengers are common. However, a Delta flight recently diverted because a four-legged traveler wasn’t feeling well, as reported by Matthew at Live and Let’s Fly. Was that unreasonable?
Delta flight diverts to Minneapolis over sick dog
This incident happened on Monday, May 26, 2025, and involves Delta flight DL694, scheduled to operate from Detroit (DTW) to Los Angeles (LAX). The flight was operated by an Airbus A321, with 181 passengers and six crew members onboard.
Roughly an hour into the flight, a dog became sick, and the crew asked if there was a veterinarian onboard. There was, and that person helped to assist the dog. The decision was ultimately made for the flight to divert to Minneapolis (MSP), so that the dog and its human friend could be let off the plane, and receive treatment.
The flight was initially scheduled to depart Detroit at 8:28PM and arrive in Los Angeles at 10:31PM, with a block time of 5hr3min. With the diversion, the flight ended up arriving in Los Angeles at 12:56AM, 2hr25min behind schedule. While enroute on the second segment, the captain reportedly updated passengers, to state that the dog would be okay.
Delta issued the following statement in response to the incident:
The safety of our customers and people comes before everything else at Delta. That’s why Delta flight 694 diverted to MSP to ensure a cabin pet that became ill received proper care.”
Is a diversion for a pet unjustified?
Matthew makes an interesting argument regarding this diversion. He states he’s not a dog owner, but recognizes that a lot of people love their pets. He says he’s not opposed to diverting flights for sick dogs, but:
But I also note that a diversion costs a lot of money…extra fuel, extra crew time, and potentially overnight accommodations and meal vouchers for passengers who may have missed onward connections.
Because bringing pets onboard airplanes is an elective act, I believe that Delta should send a bill to the dog owner. Why should Delta have to pay for the choice to bring a dog onboard? Why should any airline have to stomach the cost for an accessory that becomes ill onboard?
Putting a price on the head of a dog is difficult…continuing the flight if it would have resulted in the death or permanent injury to the dog is inhumane. But those who take their dogs onboard planes should be prepared to pay up if they do want to divert when the dog becomes sick.
I have a very different take on this. First of all, I don’t follow the argument that “bringing pets onboard airplanes is an elective act.” I mean, unless you’re being trafficked, getting on a plane is also an elective act for humans. Most diversions due to human medical issues are for people who are in higher risk categories, yet they elect to get onto planes. Should we also charge them for diversions?
If you were to charge people for medical diversions in situations like this, that seems downright cruel. The average American has savings that’s in the four-figures. A diversion can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Should people be given the option of whether they want their pet to live, or whether they should be bankrupt?
Say you took that approach, and the person decides they can’t afford the diversion. Imagine the dog then dies onboard. Do you really want to be on a plane with a dead dog and a crying dog owner for hours? That doesn’t sound pleasant to me either!
Lastly, to what end would a passenger be reimbursing Delta? To boost the carrier’s bottom line and share price, so the airline can engage in more stock buybacks? It’s not clear how that would create any level of justice for anyone.
So I unequivocally commend Delta for this diversion, as I think it was the right move. While I know some people don’t like the service dog culture in the United States, the reality is that not all dogs travel that way. The airline also generates millions in revenue per year through pet fees. This is a small way that’s counteracted.
For that matter, look how rare this is. Dozens of flights around the world divert every day for medical issues. When’s the last time we heard of a flight diverting due to a sick pet in the cabin? That even furthers the point of why a pet owner shouldn’t be on the hook for this, since it’s not like it’s a recurring issue.
Bottom line
A Delta flight from Detroit to Los Angeles diverted to Minneapolis after a dog in the cabin became sick. While a delay like this is of course inconvenient for everyone, it was ultimately the right move, and the dog was okay after receiving treatment. I commend Delta for its action here.
What do you make of this pet diversion?
Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.