Bad Take: Congressman Accuses US Airlines Of Boycotting Israel

At the moment, no US airlines are flying nonstop between the United States and Israel. American hasn’t resumed service since the initial October 7 attacks, while Delta and United have done their best to operate service safely, though there have been multiple suspensions.

Service from these airlines to Israel has at this point been suspended indefinitely, given the rapidly evolving situation. A politician is now taking issue with that, and I can’t help but think he has a really bad take…

Ritchie Torres accuses US airlines of “effectively boycotting” Israel

Democratic US Congressman Ritchie Torres from New York has written a letter to the CEOs of American, Delta, and United. He accuses the airlines of “effectively boycotting” Israel, and demands that they resume service to Israel at once. Here’s the main part of the letter:

I am writing to express concern about the suspension of air travel between the United States and Israel. The suspension has been so prolonged and so pervasive that El Al, an Israeli airline, has become the sole carrier offering direct flights from America to Israel. The lack of competition has made air travel to Israel less available and less affordable, putting customers at the mercy of a de facto monopoly that can easily gouge prices with impunity.

Unlike in 2014, when the FAA forbade air travel to Israel (generating considerable controversy at the time), the American airline industry has arbitrarily and unilaterally imposed its own ban on travel to Israel, independently of an order from the FAA. Airlines should be prohibited from effectively boycotting or otherwise discriminating against the world’s only Jewish State. It is one thing to temporarily suspend air travel to Israel on security grounds as defined by the FAA. But to unilaterally suspend air travel indefinitely until mid-2025, as American Airlines has done, has the practical effect of a boycott. Given the arbitrary length of the suspension, one could be forgiven for thinking that the BDS movement had taken over the American aviation industry without anyone noticing, much less crying foul. By what logic and in what universe is it safe for El Al to travel to Israel but too dangerous for American Airlines, Delta, and United to do so? It is worth noting that UAE airlines like Etihad, FlyDubai, and Wizz Air Abu Dhabi continue to fly to Israel without incident.

We are calling on every American airline to restore air travel to Israel and to operate based on FAA guidance in order to prevent the appearance and the substance of discrimination against the Jewish State.

What a bizarre thing to accuse US airlines of

The Israel and Palestine conflict is of course incredibly divisive, so I want to unpack these claims in an objective way.

To start, let’s be honest — there’s absolutely nothing that airline CEOs want more than to maximize profitability. That’s especially true when you consider that United is quickly catching up to Delta when it comes to financial results, and United has also historically been (by far) the strongest US airline in Israel. Israel is also an incredibly lucrative market for airlines, especially with the current capacity landscape, and it’s why EL AL has reported record profitability in the past year.

US airlines aren’t currently flying to Israel both due to direct security concerns, and also because they aren’t able to do so reliably. Just a few weeks ago, Iran threatened direct retaliation against Israel, after Israel killed Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh via a missile strike.

It doesn’t make sense for airlines to constantly launch service, only to then suspend it when the next security concern arises. Airlines need to be able to do consistent fleet planning, and they can’t just have planes sitting around, in hopes of maybe being able to fly to Israel.

The current challenge is just that Israel service can’t be operated reliably enough for it to make sense for US airlines, and that’s that. I can guarantee that US airline executives (including those working in fleet planning) aren’t somehow conspiring to “punish” Israel.

Two parts of the letter stand out to me. First of all, there’s this:

The American airline industry has arbitrarily and unilaterally imposed its own ban on travel to Israel, independently of an order from the FAA. Airlines should be prohibited from effectively boycotting or otherwise discriminating against the world’s only Jewish State.

I can’t tell if Torres is simply trying to score some cheap points, or honestly believes this?

  • Airlines can “unilaterally” end service wherever they’d like; aside from Essential Air Service markets or airports with slot controls that have “use it or lose it” provisions, of course they can fly whatever they want to, and they should be able to
  • To equate temporarily suspending service to Israel after Iran vowed direct retaliation against Israel to “effectively boycotting or otherwise discriminating against the world’s only Jewish State” is ridiculous

Then there’s this tidbit:

By what logic and in what universe is it safe for El Al to travel to Israel but too dangerous for American Airlines, Delta, and United to do so?

I guess Torres really didn’t do his research here:

  • EL AL aircraft are equipped with special safety features, including anti-missile systems, which the aircraft of US airlines aren’t equipped with
  • EL AL is exclusively based in Israel, so flying to and from the country is literally EL AL’s only option; the alternative would just be to shut down
  • EL AL operates with a deep commitment to Israel, and the Jewish faith; I mean, the airline doesn’t even fly on the Sabbath
  • US airlines generally err more on the side of caution than some other carriers when it comes to the conditions under which they’ll fly to a destination, to minimize risk; for that matter, the unions at US airlines generally object to flying to destinations if there are legitimate safety concerns
No, US airlines really aren’t boycotting Israel

Bottom line

A US Congressman from New York is accusing US airlines of boycotting Israel by suspending service to the country. While there are all kinds of legitimate cases that could be made about discrimination, this isn’t among them.

US airlines have suspended flights to Israel over safety concerns, and because of how unreliably they’ve been able to operate this service, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. The reason EL AL has been able to continue flying is because the airline operates on a different level when it comes to safety, and also because EL AL has no other option — the airline would otherwise have to shut down.

What do you make of Torres’ letter to airline CEOs?

Conversations (68)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Ari Guest

While this may be political grandstanding, I would rank this blog post as 'incomplete'. The post explains in one sentence the reason that US carriers aren't currently operating to Israel: "US airlines aren’t currently flying to Israel both due to direct security concerns, and also because they aren’t able to do so reliably." Honestly, that isn't two reasons--a "both"--but rather one reason: the carriers feel that they can't do so reliably because of security concerns). In any event, the point about FZ et. al. is somewhat sideways in that this blog post failed to acknowledge that those crews don't overnight in TLV-- it is an out and back for them. UA/DL/AA crews would have to overnight in TLV. Do their unions want to do that? There are labor issues involved. That's why BA did the stop in LCA. I don't like when the "security concerns" card is pulled when it might really be a labor issue. It seems less about planes in the air, taking off or landing, and more about crews hanging out in TLV. Or it does to me, anyway.

0
‼ 0
ak_22 Gold

The government of Israel is covering the increased insurance costs for El Al, but not for other airlines: https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2023/10/13/744105.htm How about Torres proposing to cover the same for the American airlines?

0
‼ 0
Markus Guest

Funny how it's safe for European airlines to fly along with Fly Dubai and Etihad but the US airlines stay away. Ben your anti israel bias is showing again

0
‼ 0
Pete Guest

Yeah, and if one United, AA, or Delta aircraft was hit by a Hamas, Hezbollah, or Houthi rocket, the "Honorable gentleman" from New York would be railing against them for deliberately endangering American lives and encouraging their loved-ones to sue the carrier into bankruptcy.

0
‼ 0
Ron Guest

BA services LHR-TLV-LHR with a LCA stopover, overnighting crews. Definitely shunned by Pax ... airline downgraded service to a single aisle aircraft. LY , cashing in , with 2 wide bodies per day completely sold out in all classes.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published