Atlanta ATC Screws Up, Sends Delta Jets On Terrifying Collision Course Over Airport

A few days ago, two Delta aircraft had an incredibly close call over the runways of Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), in what can only be described as a massive situational awareness failure on the part of the air traffic controller…

ATC sends Delta plane directly into path of another plane

VASAviation has the air traffic control audio and a visualization of an incident that happened a few days ago at Atlanta Airport. For some background on the two planes involved:

  • Delta flight DL2472 was an Airbus A321 departing for Rochester (ROC) that was cleared for takeoff on runway 26L
  • Delta flight DL1568 was a Boeing 737 arriving from Pittsburgh (PIT) that was cleared to land on runway 26R around the same time

You might not think much of this, except for the fact that the pilots of DL1568 opted to perform a go around at the last minute, as the Frontier Airlines jet landing before them didn’t clear the runway with enough buffer. Fair enough.

So at this point you had a Delta 737 going around above one runway, and a Delta A321 taking off on a parallel runway. That’s not ideal, but also not a huge issue, since they had an altitude difference, and also were both on the same headings, but parallel.

It’s not like the air traffic controller would turn the two planes on a collision course… right? Well, actually…

Somehow the air traffic controller didn’t seem to be processing how close the planes were to one another, but this is where the situation went from bad to worse. The air traffic controller then gave the plane on the left (taking off from runway 26L) the instruction to make a sharp right turn, even though the plane going around (from runway 26R) was to its right.

That’s right, she sent the plane on the left directly into the course of the plane on the right. This sets off a TCAS alert, which the pilots in turn responded to. It would appear that the planes were basically on top of one another, with a vertical distance of around 500 feet.

For those not familiar with TCAS, this stands for Traffic Collision Avoidance System, and it issues resolution advisories to pilots, giving them instructions about what maneuvers to make, based on traffic becoming dangerously close.

At this point the air traffic controller seemed to go into a bit of a shock, and struggled to manage the situation. It would appear that after about a minute she was replaced by someone else, to give her a chance to catch her breath, or something.

Fortunately the planes quickly got sufficient distance, and went on their respective ways without further incident…

There’s so much that was wrong with this situation

On the most basic level, this was human error. My guess is that the air traffic controller’s instructions for a right turn were actually for the plane performing a go around, and not for the plane that had just taken off. As you can hear, the pilots of DL2472 seemed to be caught off guard by their altitude and heading instructions, which is why they followed up.

That’s a pretty major mistake to make when two planes are already so close to one another. She clearly didn’t have situational awareness here, since she was giving another plane taxi instructions while two planes were getting closer and closer to one another.

Another pilot just jumping in and saying “damn boys” on a frequency didn’t exactly help either. Then there’s the whole United States culture around non-standard phraseology, giving landing instructions even before the runway is clear, etc. We just don’t seem to have the safety margins that we once had…

Bottom line

We saw a dangerous close call over the skies of Atlanta Airport the other day, when one Delta plane was taking off, and another was performing a go around, on parallel runways. The air traffic controller seemed distracted, and didn’t initially notice how close the planes were getting to one another. But she made the situation worse when she instructed the plane on the left to turn right, directly into the path of the plane on the right. As usual, TCAS saved the day…

What do you make of this ATL close call?

Conversations (29)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

dee Guest

I would love one! It would be great to see the TDSers reaction when they see one!!!\ Priceless...

0
‼ 0
Anthony Guest

Did these incidents always occur but were not reported on the media? Or are you on to some new type of surveillance information to get this information? It is pretty frequent now.

0
‼ 0
GrantM Guest

A contributing factor to this may be that US ATC seems to want to actively control aircraft going missed rather than letting them fly the published missed approach. If you have a published missed procedure, it should be safe to fly regardless of what other aircraft are doing. This would let aircraft declare they're going missed and fly the procedure, then Tower can transfer them to approach/departure when they have a chance (rather than having to direct them while juggling others) and then the new controller will know what they're doing and can direct them accordingly to get back into the approach. It's not perfect but such a process could have helped in this scenario (or am I missing something?)

0
‼ 0
Alex Guest

This is exactly why we have safety nets like TCAS (which, as a sidenote to Ben stands for Traffic ALERT and Collision Avoidance System - it's a two tier system that provides Traffic Information and/or Resolution Advisories, depending on the situation). It is also a perfect example for a situation in which everything and everyone has to work perfectly in order for these system to work efficiently. As to your guess "the air traffic controller’s instructions for a right turn were actually for the plane performing a go around, and not for the plane that had just taken off": I don't think so. What happened in my opinion is that the Controller missed the notification from DL1568 that they are going around. This means that she was convinced that DL1568 was on the ground, rolling out and that therefore the right turn for DL2472 was safe. Also, have you noticed that DL2472 got the read-back wrong? They acknowlegded heading 340 while the instruction was for heading 360. But that also wasn't caught by the Controller. Also, the reaction from the pilots to the TCAS Alert needs to be evaluated. At 1:20 radar shows an alert to DL1568. At that point the vertical distance between the two aircraft was 600 feet (with DL1568 being below). That's when DL1568 reminds the Controller that they are in a Go-Around, rather than reacting to the TCAS Alert (my assumption is that the Alert was "level off" as DL1568 was in a climb and DL2472 was above). Two seconds later, the TCAS Alert lights up for DL2472. At 1:29 DL1568 receives a clearance to turn right heading 360 and to climb to 4000 feet. The pilot was hesitating in the read-back (possibly due to the TCAS Alert on the flight deck). At the same time the climb-rate reduced which may have been a result of the TCAS Alert. The first mention of the TCAS Alert was from DL2472 at 1:35 (I assume they received a "climb climb" alert to increase the vertical distance to DL1568). It seems that only then the Controller became aware of the close proximity of these two aircraft. Thus, while the Controller clearly lost situational awareness and bears the main responsibility for the incident, also the flight crews reaction to the TCAS Alerts needs to be evaluated. There is a reason why TCAS Alerts override Controller instructions. But the "weak point" in this system is pilots reaction. And this is, in my opinion, also something that wasn't ideal in this situation.

0
‼ 0
Lieflat19 Diamond

Another DEI hire gone wrong in aviation...

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published