British Airways To Offer Pilots Bonus For Burning Less Fuel: Smart Or Risky?

Fuel is one of the biggest expenses that airlines have (especially at the moment), so British Airways is planning on introducing an intriguing new scheme to incentivize pilots to cut fuel burn. This seems smart on the surface, though it does raise the question of whether this could cause pilots to adopt some less than ideal practices.

British Airways pilots may get 1% bonus for cutting fuel burn

Bloomberg reports how British Airways has proposed a new incentive scheme that would reward pilots for reducing fuel burn and carbon emissions.

Under the plan, which would kick in as of 2027, pilots would get a potential bonus of up to 1% on their basic salary if collective targets are met. Pilots would need to collectively cut carbon dioxide emissions by 60,000 tons above 2025 levels to unlock the payout.

The plan is expected to be put out to a vote among members of the British Airlines Pilots Association (BALPA) in late April 2026. It’s not clear to me what downside there is to pilots, so I’m not sure why they’d vote against this.

As you can tell based on the timeline, this isn’t specific to the current spike in oil prices, since it would only be implemented in 2027, but instead, is about long term savings.

Per the document to pilots, “flight crew decisions have a direct and measurable impact on fuel burn and emissions,” and “the incentive exists only to recognise and reward fuel efficient behaviours when, and only when, they are compatible with uncompromised safety and sound airmanship.”

British Airways wants to incentivize pilots to burn less fuel

How could British Airways pilots reduce fuel burn?

I think most people would agree that the concept of incentivizing reduced fuel burn seems like a win-win. I think the logical question that some people may have is how much control pilots actually have over fuel burn.

For example, we could see how something like this would work for those driving cars — some drivers constantly accelerate fast and then slam on breaks, and obviously that’s not great for fuel burn, vehicle maintenance costs, etc.

Flying a plane is a bit different, though, since pilots are following checklists, air traffic control instructions, etc. The amount of engine power applied at takeoff is based on the length of the runway and other factors, rather than based on a pilot’s “vibes.”

This initiative is apparently largely focused on reducing fuel burn through updated taxiing procedures and also fuel load planning. When it comes to taxiing, I imagine we could see planes primarily taxi with just one engine, to reduce fuel burn on the ground. That’s easy enough to implement, though I’d say the trickier topic is adjusting fuel load planning.

Planes obviously carry fuel reserves in case they need to enter holding patterns, deviate around weather, divert, etc., as that buffer is important for the safe operation of flights. There’s a cost to all that excess fuel, even just purely in terms of the fuel burn for carrying the weight of the extra fuel that won’t be used.

So I have to imagine this project would incentivize carrying as little extra fuel as possible. Admittedly there are regulations about the minimum amount of extra fuel that needs to be carried, so it’s not like pilots can be reckless here, and I wouldn’t call this “dangerous.”

At the same time, one does wonder if such an incentive system makes sense, especially when there’s an annual target. Ultimately the captain has final say on how much extra fuel is carried (beyond the minimums), and it does seem to me like this potentially gets rid of some buffer, even if it’s by no means “unsafe.”

British Airways pilots would update their fuel load planning

Bottom line

British Airways is planning on incentivizing pilots to reduce fuel burn. If targets are met, pilots could get a bonus of up to 1% on their annual pay. The idea is that pilots could use new taxiing procedures and updated fuel load planning to cut emissions.

This seems like a reasonable enough concept, though perhaps eliminating some buffer on how much extra fuel is carried is something passengers may not love.

What do you make of British Airways’ proposed bonus for pilots?

Conversations (29)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

A. Wolf Guest

Shouldn’t the pilots be doing that all along?

0
‼ 0
Northern Flyer Guest

“If you turn off the engines at 40,000 you can glide a long way before you have to turn them back on again.”

1
‼ 0
MrBA777 Guest

All of these comments are hilarious. No, pilots won't suddenly start flying slow or cutting corners. However it could disincentivise extra fuel carriage in excess of minimums for holding. The bigger problem is this incentive is wrapped up into a paydeal so it's a vote on all or nothing. The rest of the deal is toilet.

0
‼ 0
FlyerDon Guest

Are their Dispatchers also going to get a bonus if they plan less fuel on the flights they are responsible for? In the US the captain and dispatcher share joint authority for each flight they are assigned. The dispatch release and the fuel plan are usually completed at least 90 minutes prior to departure and are released into the system about 70-75 minutes before departure. In many cases the aircraft will be fueled before the captain has pulled up his or her release. If you want to save fuel you would be better off giving your dispatcher’s a fuel saving bonus rather than your flight crews.

0
‼ 0
Foul Owl Guest

aviation disasters did an episode on this issue. pilots did not want to do a go around partly bc of bonuses related to fuel savings (in indonesia I recall) well… it didn’t end well and the correction was getting rid of the fuel savings bonus at the airline. this seems like a really stupid idea to go and repeat

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published