American Launching A321XLR Flights To Porto, Portugal… But Only In Mid-2027

American Launching A321XLR Flights To Porto, Portugal… But Only In Mid-2027

19

American Airlines has just announced its newest transatlantic route, which doesn’t come as much of a surprise, except for the unusual timing of the announcement…

American will fly from Philadelphia to Porto, Portugal

American has announced that it plans to launch a new daily seasonal flight between Philadelphia (PHL) and Porto (OPO) in the summer of 2027. The airline hasn’t yet announced the schedule for the 3,414-mile service, and this will be American’s second destination in Portugal, after Lisbon (LIS).

American will fly from Philadelphia to Porto

American intends to use an Airbus A321XLR for the flight, which is American’s newest aircraft type. This plane is equipped with 155 seats, including 20 business class seats, 12 premium economy seats, and 123 economy seats. As I recently wrote about, business class on this plane isn’t proving to be a huge hit with customers.

On the plus side, the A321XLR enables this kind of growth, thanks to its low capacity and long range. The issue is that American’s network growth thanks to the A321XLR is kind of slow, given that the airline is first placing these on transcon routes, to replace the premium equipped A321Ts, before expanding long haul too much.

American will fly the A321XLR to Portugal

American will be the last of the “big three” US carriers to fly to Porto, as it’s a destination already served by United, and Delta is launching service there in the summer of 2026.

Here’s how American’s SVP of Network and Schedule Planning, Brian Znotins, describes this:

“Porto is exactly the type of new market the Airbus A321XLR enables us to serve. While we’ll have even more new routes to share later this year for summer 2027, we’re eager to continue growing our long-haul network that features service to new destinations, including Budapest, Hungary, and Prague that will start this summer.”

The timing of this announcement is a bit unusual

I’m always happy to see American add international destinations, given the extent to which the airline lags competitors with international network, at least outside of Latin America and the Caribbean. So that’s great.

However, the timing here is unusual. Typically, American announces new transatlantic routes in the very late summer or fall before they’re launched, at the earliest. So to see American announce this route well over a year in advance is something I don’t remember seeing before for any other route.

Is this an attempt to generate some positive buzz, at a time when the airline could use it? After all, it’s not like customers will be able to book this flight for several months. Or is there some other explanation that I’m missing?

While this is an unusual approach for American to take, it is something that Delta often does. For example for how long has Delta been announcing that it’ll fly to India, at this point?

This new route is being announced very early

Bottom line

American plans to launch a new route to Porto, Portugal, as of the summer of 2027, using the new A321XLR. The schedule for the flight hasn’t yet been published, and for that matter, the flight likely won’t be bookable for months.

It’s nice to see American expanding internationally, and Porto seems like a logical addition. Admittedly American is just following Delta and United, with the former launching flights to Porto as of this year, and the latter already serving the market.

What do you make of American flying to Porto?

Conversations (19)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. AeroB13a Diamond

    A fine crop of Chinese Bot-baiters you have attracted with this article Ben. Well done old bean.

    1. 1990 Guest

      I thought you were pretending to be British…

      One things for sure… you are dim… some…

    2. AeroB14a Guest

      Some of us do not have to pretend to be anything other than what we really are. It is only the Chinese Bots like you 1990 who are pretending to be something other than a poorly written computer program, yes?

  2. George Guest

    The best way to arrive in Portugal at the moment is either thru Porto or MAD or BCN. Lisbon airport is old and immigration can be terrible with all the flights arriving from South and North America plus African countries.

  3. JHS Guest

    Yet another future AA route utilizing an aircraft that contains exactly twelve decent seats. Glad that 100% of my travel is discretionary.

  4. Erica Guest

    Wish AA would fly Austin to Tokyo!

  5. yoloswag420 Guest

    Is AA too scared to fly JFK-OPO?

    This is where the route really should be if they want to be taken seriously in NYC.

    1. Julie Guest

      Yes…
      Relevance in NYC is determined by… Porto service…? lol
      I assume airlines that want to be taken seriously in NYC would only serve BRU from NYC vs a different hub? ;)

      Thanks for the joke this evening. Stick to the comment section of aviation ;)

    2. Eskimo Guest

      Given that 3 airlines fly NYC to OPO, with two of them beingUA and DL, it's fairly relevant when AA is the only one of the US3 airlines not willing to.

      The fact that AA is unwilling to launch new routes that the A321XLR are designed for from JFK does speak volumes.

      Stick with the low IQ racism Julie, trying to sound intellectual doesn't work for you.

    3. Julie Guest

      right... because the logical and profitable move for AA would be to go fly a route that is already flown by three competitors... Or... maybe... the better place is to fly it from a city with no competition, lower connecting costs than EWR and JFK and focus on local demand and connecting passengers at a lower cost than UA and DL.
      Gee... what a novel idea.
      We're talking about Porto, not London.

      And...

      right... because the logical and profitable move for AA would be to go fly a route that is already flown by three competitors... Or... maybe... the better place is to fly it from a city with no competition, lower connecting costs than EWR and JFK and focus on local demand and connecting passengers at a lower cost than UA and DL.
      Gee... what a novel idea.
      We're talking about Porto, not London.

      And AA is primarily flying the XLR out of JFK vs PHL. Let's not exaggerate to look cool on a comment section. ;)

      I'll let you sit with your weird comment about racist comments. No idea what you're talking about Eskimo. Frankly, I doubt you know what you're talking about either but just wanted to say it to sound cool.

    4. Eskimo Guest

      You really must be slow in the head. It's not very difficult to understand.

      You literally wrote out that AA is actively choosing to avoid competition in NYC aka they cannot compete in NYC. So by definition, that is a statement to their relevance in NYC.

      Please use your braincells, if you have any.

    5. Julie Guest

      ahhhh. So we're just going to pretend that AA has the ability to fly the exact same number of flights/destinations out of JFK or EWR that UA and DL have, huh?

      Well, by the very nature of how slot-constrained airports (JFK) or gate-constrained airports (EWR) work, there's no possible way AA can ever be relevant in NYC under your (and I mean the dual personality Yolo/Eskimo posting under various names) criteria because they'll always be...

      ahhhh. So we're just going to pretend that AA has the ability to fly the exact same number of flights/destinations out of JFK or EWR that UA and DL have, huh?

      Well, by the very nature of how slot-constrained airports (JFK) or gate-constrained airports (EWR) work, there's no possible way AA can ever be relevant in NYC under your (and I mean the dual personality Yolo/Eskimo posting under various names) criteria because they'll always be about half the size.

      JFK isn't a free for all -- fly wherever you want -- airport. AA has to choose where to compete against DL and UA in NYC. A leisure route to northern Portugal isn't a place anyone with any real aviation knowledge would say "wow... AA chose to compete against DL/UA in OPO from NYC in a limited slot environment. How relevant they've become now for that niche tourism group in New York" (let's just ignore that AA is the only carrier in NYC with a JV partner in the Iberian peninsula).
      Again. Just like DL chooses not to fly BRU against United from NYC but rather from ATL, it's easy to see why AA would start a pure leisure route amply served for the local NYC population from a nearby hub with zero competition vs JFK where they have to choose the routes to compete against DL and UA due to limited slots.

      but keep criticizing brain cells when you have nothing left of relevance to say in the comments. It's about all you have left since your attempt at calling me a racist over... OPO... fell flat.

      Next...

    6. Julia Guest

      Generational crashout over some delulu posting by you. Nothing you said even makes sense at this point.

      And I say this as your trolling alt account.

  6. 1990 Guest

    PHL-OPO makes sense for AA; and this is the type of route XLR was meant for. United and TAP fly nonstop EWR-OPO. Lots of Portuguese-Americans in the Mid-Atlantic-NE. For visitors, Douro is lovely. Decent Six Senses there if looking to burn that $250 IHG CSR credit (though, would have to wait for AA to fly there.)

  7. James K. Guest

    Maybe it's vaporware like AA's PHL-CMN route. You get positive buzz for announcing it and don't have to follow through

    1. 1990 Guest

      Right. Only United does weird routes like Ulaanbaatar and Nuuk... American just talks about it.

    2. dfw88 Guest

      Calling the PHL-CMN route vaporware is pretty silly. The flight was supposed to start in May of 2020. The reason it did not is well-documented and completely valid. After COVID AA didn't have the 757s that were supposed to fly the route anymore and so hasn't readded it, though many have speculated it may be an XLR route one of these days. You're acting like the global pandemic didn't change airlines' plans.

    3. James K. Guest

      That's fair. I should have used SEA-BLR as my example

  8. Nelson Diamond

    If it starts I doubt it will last long...

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Julie Guest

right... because the logical and profitable move for AA would be to go fly a route that is already flown by three competitors... Or... maybe... the better place is to fly it from a city with no competition, lower connecting costs than EWR and JFK and focus on local demand and connecting passengers at a lower cost than UA and DL. Gee... what a novel idea. We're talking about Porto, not London. And AA is primarily flying the XLR out of JFK vs PHL. Let's not exaggerate to look cool on a comment section. ;) I'll let you sit with your weird comment about racist comments. No idea what you're talking about Eskimo. Frankly, I doubt you know what you're talking about either but just wanted to say it to sound cool.

2
Julie Guest

Yes… Relevance in NYC is determined by… Porto service…? lol I assume airlines that want to be taken seriously in NYC would only serve BRU from NYC vs a different hub? ;) Thanks for the joke this evening. Stick to the comment section of aviation ;)

2
1990 Guest

PHL-OPO makes sense for AA; and this is the type of route XLR was meant for. United and TAP fly nonstop EWR-OPO. Lots of Portuguese-Americans in the Mid-Atlantic-NE. For visitors, Douro is lovely. Decent Six Senses there if looking to burn that $250 IHG CSR credit (though, would have to wait for AA to fly there.)

2
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published