Air India Jet With CEO Onboard Diverts To Delhi, Following Crash

Today, we’re seeing absolutely horrifying scenes out of Ahmedabad, as a London-bound Air Boeing 787 crashed shortly after takeoff, with 242 people onboard. While a minor detail in the scheme of things, I think it’s interesting to note a reason that another Air India Boeing 787-8 diverted this afternoon.

Air India’s Delhi to Paris flight returns to Delhi after takeoff

Today (June 12, 2025), one of Air India’s daily flights from Delhi (DEL) to Paris (CDG) diverted. Specifically, AI143 was operated by a 10-year-old Boeing 787-8 with the registration code VT-ANU.

The plane took off from Delhi at 1:26PM, ready to operate the 4,088-mile journey to France. The aircraft climbed up to 38,000 feet and flew southwest for roughly an hour, before making a u-turn and returning to Delhi. The aircraft landed back in Delhi at 3:59PM local time, just over 2.5 hours after it first departed.

An Air India Boeing 787 returned to Delhi

So, why did the aircraft divert? Coincidentally, this was the same aircraft variant as the one involved in the crash, but that’s not the reason for the diversion. Instead, reports suggest that the reason is because Air India CEO Campbell Wilson was onboard this flight, headed to Paris for next week’s Paris Air Show.

Clearly the decision was made that the priority was having him on the ground in India to deal with this crisis for the airline. Keep in mind that Air India doesn’t have Wi-Fi on its 787s, so this made contacting him a bit challenging.

Presumably the pilots were alerted from operations about the situation, and the crew then let Wilson know. I’m curious to what extent details were relayed to passengers. I can’t imagine that the crew announced “hey, a jet identical to this one just crashed, so we need to return to India so that our CEO can deal with the situation.”

I suspect this was instead blamed on “operational reasons,” or something, and given the lack of Wi-Fi, passengers were probably very confused until they landed back in Delhi, and connected to their phones. Presumably the airline will arrange another flight to Paris.

I can’t help but wonder if some passengers may feel uncomfortable taking it, in light of all that happened, plus the flight being operated by the same aircraft variant (to be clear, I’m not saying that’s logical, but fear often isn’t logical).

Was Air India’s decision to divert the flight reasonable?

People online are divided about whether diverting a flight to drop off the CEO in a time of crisis is a reasonable decision.

Some people argue that the plane should’ve continued to Paris, and Wilson could’ve then turned right around, and been back in Delhi within 24 hours. At a minimum, 200+ passengers are probably looking at a delay of six or more hours (conservatively), so that’s a lot of wasted time.

At the same time, this is a time of crisis and horrible tragedy for the company, and it’s not unreasonable that the company needs the CEO on the ground in India to be able to manage the situation and communicate publicly as much as possible, ASAP.

Personally, I think this was completely reasonable on Air India’s part. It’s one thing if the diversion were over something that wasn’t actually serious, but we’re talking about what’s potentially the most significant plane crash we’ve seen in a very long time.

The airline industry is one of passion, and I can’t even imagine the horror that Wilson had to come to terms with when he learned what happened. Airline executives are usually focused on the business side of things, but also have an unwavering commitment to safety. To learn of one of “your” wide body jets going down must be bone-chilling.

This seems like a reasonable justification for diverting

Bottom line

An Air India Boeing 787 scheduled to fly from Delhi to Paris returned to its origin, landing there around 2.5 hours after it first departed. This was because Air India CEO Campbell Wilson was onboard, and was needed on the ground in India to deal with this tragedy.

While this of course represented a significant amount of wasted time for passengers, I think this was a fair enough decision, given the level of tragedy we’re seeing.

What do you make of this Air India diversion?

Conversations (84)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Dick Schmitt Guest

Leadership requires the CEO to be on the ground in the time of crisis.

0
‼ 0
Bbt Guest

I really don’t see a problem with this. It’s a unique situation and it was a warranted stop. I’m sure if you asked the passengers on that flight, given the situation, they would understand.

1
‼ 0
Vivek Guest

Diversion was likely due to the airspace closure over Iraq and neighbouring middle eastern airspace. The routing already diverts from it’s normal course because of Pakistan airspace closure, this sudden airspace closure after getting airborne would not leave it with enough fuel to complete the flight. Several flights were diverted that day.

1
‼ 0
WinstonTeracina Guest

Don’t agree with the diversion but this was certainly more warranted than diverting for a sick dog.

0
‼ 0
DaveInLon Guest

AI has a dual hub model, DEL and BOM. The point where the flight turned around over Indian airspace is closer to the latter than the former. BOM is also the location of Tata Sons HQ. Therefore it's intriguing why the flight turned around, instead of going to BOM, where the CEO could have dealt with the issue as he and the management wanted him to. Undoubtedly there's an explanation, but at this stage it's intriguing.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published