Messy: Air Canada Flight Attendants Defy Order To Return To Work

Oh my, grab your popcorn…

Air Canada flight attendants defy Canadian government

For several months, Air Canada flight attendants have been in negotiations for a new contract. The situation really escalated over the past week.

Earlier in the week, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which represents Air Canada’s roughly 10,000 flight attendants, issued a 72-hour strike warning. Air Canada management responded by issuing a flight attendant lockout notice, meaning that all Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights would be canceled as of Saturday, August 16, 2025.

Indeed, all flights ended up being canceled yesterday. However, the Canadian government quickly stepped in. Patty Hajdu, Canada’s Minister of Jobs and Families, exercised her authorities under section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, to compel the two parties to enter binding arbitration with the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB).

This is what Air Canada management was calling for all along, while the union was opposed to this, since it means that members wouldn’t be able to vote on a new contract. With the government’s plan for binding arbitration, it meant that Air Canada could resume operations as of 2PM EDT today, Sunday, August 17, 2025…

…or so the government and Air Canada management thought? Air Canada has now suspended its plan to resume operations, after it claims the union “illegally directed its flight attendant members to defy” the order to return to work. Now Air Canada claims it will resume operations as of the evening of Monday, August 18, 2025, though let’s see how that plays out.

Earlier today, a union representative stated that “our membership are not going back to work,” claiming the “whole process has been unfair,” and that the union plans to challenge what it calls an unconstitutional order. “Air Canada has really refused to bargain with us and they refused to bargain with us because they knew this government would come in on their white horse and try and save the day.”

I’m curious to see how this all plays out…

I’m no expert on Canadian labor laws, but this sure seems like an exceptionally messy situation. You have a company and a union at war, then you have the government try to step in, and then you have the union claim that the government is acting unconstitutionally. A few thoughts:

  • I’m curious what punishment flight attendants could face for defying these orders, either with the company or with the government
  • If the union plans to challenge the government’s claim, then this doesn’t seem like something that’s going to be resolved very quickly, so I wouldn’t count on Air Canada resuming operations very soon
  • This is one of the messiest airline labor contract disputes that we’ve seen in… a very long time? I can’t help but wonder if things will go back to normal when this is all done, or if the bad blood will last for a long time

I’ve gotta say, I’m a bit puzzled by Canada’s labor laws here. On the one hand, Canada has much more labor-friendly policies in terms of actually letting airline employees go on strike, unlike in the United States, where it’s very close to impossible.

But then at the same time, if airline employees go on strike, the government can just use its authorities under section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, which gives the government broad discretionary powers to intervene in labor disputes to maintain or secure industrial peace. That seems to take a lot of rights away from employees, no? It’s basically like “you have the right to go on strike, unless we don’t feel like allowing you to.”

Bottom line

On Saturday, Air Canada flight attendants went on strike, as part of a bitter contract dispute. Within a day, the Canadian government stepped in to try and stop the strike, and force management and the union into binding arbitration. With this, flight attendants were supposed to return to work as of this afternoon, though the union is defying that order, claims it’s unconstitutional, and flight attendants will remain on strike…

How do you see this dispute playing out?

Conversations (113)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Tim Dunn Diamond

you gotta keep this story on the front page, Ben. This is big news for the labor movement. It looks increasingly like it is going to get nasty. Air Canada didn't figure it would be thrust in the middle of a national worker movement but Canadians support the FAs.

0
‼ 0
Ross Guest

I have closely reviewed the Air Canada contract and find nothing that prevents a tip jar near the boarding door. Surely, many passengers who consider the FA compensation to be inadequate, could contribute something to the cause. Especially if they are leaving Canada for destinations where their small change and low-denomination loonies would be useless. Leaving a tip, of course, would have no effect on the level of assistance during meal and drink service, or lifeboat evacuation.

0
‼ 0
Will Guest

CUPE is cancer to Canada. Canada seriously needs to get rid of unions, otherwise the whole society will collapse from unions playing mafia games.

0
‼ 0
Isaac Guest

As expected CILB ordered them back to work at noon ET. It appears they are refusing this order too. CUPEs only hope is to get their other locals to strike in solidarity. Like Canada post who are not happy either that section 107 was involved.

0
‼ 0
jp Guest

I get confused by the support the FA unions receive. They gatekeep jobs that are in demand for a large portion of the labor force who are qualified for them and they are the reason why there’s a negative correlation between pay and service levels in-cabin.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published