Hotel Fines Guests £100 For Leaving Bad Review

Well this is quite… interesting. A Blackpool, UK hotel, charged guests £100 after they left a bad review online, claiming it’s their policy. Via The Telegraph:

A couple have been “fined” £100 by a Blackpool hotel they described as a “rotten stinking hovel” on travel review website TripAdvisor.

Tony and Jan Jenkinson posted the negative comments after being unimpressed with the one night they spent at the Broadway Hotel.

The couple, from Whitehaven, later found £100 charged to their credit card. The hotel said its policy was to charge for “bad” reviews.

When the couple queried the surcharge, the hotel’s manager said they had a ‘no bad review policy’ in their terms and conditions.

The policy stated: “Despite the fact that repeat customers and couples love our hotel, your friends and family may not. For every bad review left on any website, the group organizer will be charged a maximum £100 per review”.

How’s the strategy working out for them? Well, on TripAdvisor the Broadway Hotel is ranked #858 of #894 B&B/Inns in Blackpool, so not very well, apparently.

Hotel-Tripadvisor-1

Or if you look at it a different way, I guess it’s a brilliant strategy. I can’t imagine they have very many return guests, so if you can get an extra £100 out of each guest, that seems like a good way to maximize revenue. 😉

Hotel-Tripadvisor-2

This isn’t the first time something like this has happened. Surely people running hotels aren’t so stupid as to think this actually works? I have to imagine it’s a publicity stunt, something designed to get people talking about the hotel. No one would choose to stay at the hotel based on the online reviews, so they might as well go the route of trying to get people to stay there out of curiosity… no? Or maybe they’re just really old school, don’t embrace the internet, and still think they can control what’s said about them in the world?

Conversations (23)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Lisa Guest

I don't think there is such a thing as a neutral political comment - that would be a contradiction in terms. John's comment was pretty obnoxious, actually, and has nothing to do with this post. Seems to me he *wanted* people to comment on it and then be all "oh lighten up, it was a joke". It was both remarkably ignorant AND annoying because it injected politics in a place where I can usually avoid it.

0
‼ 0
@mkcol Gold

So to clarify: Yes the couple did initially dispute the transaction with their credit card company, who refunded it but then on further investigation cancelled the refund. They hadn't checked the reviews of the place prior to going as they were in a hurry to get booked. The wife who signed the contract didn't have her reading glasses on her, so couldn't see the minutiae of small print. It would probably be invalid under the Unfair Contract Terms Act which is why Trading Standards had stepped in. The hotel have now refunded the monies to the couple.

0
‼ 0
Scratchyourmadspot Guest

Rick B. Dude. Release the angst. Everything in life needn't be a battle--stop looking for one.

0
‼ 0
JustSaying Guest

I believe the correct political economic term for these folks is fascists.........and I rated them accordingly on Trip Advisor and would encourage others to follow suit...........it's ok to be angry at bullies!

0
‼ 0
Jeff Guest

@Lana B Not sure why you think the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution would protect someone in the UK.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published