26 Injured After Delta 777 Dumps Fuel On Elementary School

Delta Air Lines flight 89 bound from Los Angeles to Shanghai today experienced engine issues after takeoff. The Boeing 777-200 had to return to LAX. However, the plane was too heavy to land, so it had to dump fuel before it could do so.

Dumping fuel is totally routine when a wide body has an emergency landing, since a 777’s maximum takeoff weight is significantly higher than its maximum landing weight. Typically when airplanes dump fuel they do so over an area that’s either not populated, or over the water.

However, for whatever reason this Delta plane dumped fuel over a populated area, and in this case it even dumped fuel over a school, causing minor injuries to 27 people.

Specifically, 17 children and nine adults have been treated at an elementary school in southeast Los Angeles after a plane dumped fuel on the school’s playground. More than 70 firefighters and paramedics responded to the school.

The plane also dumped fuel in other areas, though it’s not yet known whether anyone else was injured.

So, what would cause a 777 to dump fuel at a low altitude over a populated area? Looking at flight tracking, it seems that the plane was only in the air for a total of 25 minutes, and it reached a highest altitude of 8,000 feet. The plane returned to the airport pretty immediately, as you can see based on the below map from Flightradar24.

While details are still emerging, on the surface this would suggest to me that it was a fairly serious emergency that required returning to the airport ASAP. Usually if a heavy plane dumps fuel the flight will take a lot more than 25 minutes — the plane will fly out over the water and enter a holding pattern while it dumps fuel, before returning to the airport.

In this case they clearly decided that for whatever reason there was no time for that, and they needed to dump fuel ASAP regardless of where they were flying.

Thank goodness that there were no major injuries, and that the plane landed safely. Like I said, an emergency landing as such is pretty routine and doesn’t mean the plane is in danger, though the fact that the plane was only in the air for 25 minutes and dumped fuel during this time, suggests that this was most likely a serious situation.

Conversations (68)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

TravelLawyerMom Guest

The comments on this thread are terrible. Kids shouldn't get jet fuel dumped on them period. And if they did, there better be a good and justifiable reason for it. It seems that the ATC asked the pilots TWICE if they needed to dump fuel and they respond NO. But then do it anyway without clearance. And according to other 777 experts, dumping wasn't necessary given the circumstances. Clearly protocol was not followed here and Delta has some explaining to do. Stop calling this clickbait - the article heading states a true fact. If YOU assumed facts (i.e. fault, serious injuries, etc.) not stated in the title, that's on YOU. Maybe you should complain to your therapist instead of Lucky.

0
‼ 0
CMorgan Gold

Omg Carmen are you serious? Are you really trying to make this into some sort of racial incident. Wow! As for BWs comment do you really think attempting to land a wide body that is overweight with the potential to run out of runway injuring or killing people is preferable to what happened?

0
‼ 0
Jay Guest

I actually have one question - to pilots. (I am not a pilot btw) I recall that some years ago Aeroflot Superjet 100 made an overweight landing and burst into flames. (SU1492) I read the reports and the aircraft was 1.6 tonnes overweight over 41 tonnes MLW. That would be 3.9 per cent overweight landing, and half of the people burnt to death. Reading the thread, this Delta aircraft seems to have been around 260 tonnes before dumping fuel, which is around 47 tonnes above MLW at 213 tonnes. That would have been 22 per cent overweight landing. So could it be said that this Delta aircraft was seriously close to becoming another Aeroflot SSJ 100 had it not dumped fuel, or was there anything different from that Aeroflot aircraft (such as Boeing 777 being better-built than SSJ 100 or etc...)?

0
‼ 0
iamhere Gold

If some people had to go to the hospital or seek other medical attention, let us just say, would the airline really pay for that?!?!?! Getting the payment is probably easier said than done.

0
‼ 0
Stuart Diamond

Oh Dan, you are a racist. You know that, right?

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published