So Kirby's next going to run for president in 2028? Would fit with his ego.
As Bethenny Frankel once said, “go to sleep.” Focus on making United continue doing well and that’s all.
Alongside Delta’s Ed Bastian, Scott Kirby has to have one of the most unlikable personalities of any US airline CEO. What a joke
I’m sure all the losers making 60k a year are going to be triggered by this
Dear Scott,
Please donate half of your salary to your flight attendants, and see a recruiter about signing your kids up ASAP. Until then, stick to running an airline.
He has seven children?
That's responsible.
Just kidding.
Please stop writing about this guy.
Crazy how far Lucky’s nose is in Kirby’s but……I mean business. If he farts, we hear about it here.
It'd be swell if airline CEOs could focus on running exceptional operations instead of whatever this distraction is. Like, if we're doing public policy, let's start with air passenger rights legislation, a US equivalent to EU261. (Oh, being told: 'pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!' Yeah...)
You can start a tax on fat cat frequent flyers. All miles are taxed at 50%. You don't pay with money but pay the IRS in miles for the frequent flyer tax. Every year, there's a wealth tax and 10% of your mileage balance goes to the IRS. The IRS can give those miles to Medicaid recipients.
Tax and punish the rich. Make them suffer.
Yes. He is showing himself to be pursuing the philosophers path, not corporate work.
Kirby argued that “the more fair system is, some way of taxing that wealth growth, whether it’s a wealth tax or some other way of doing it, and lower income taxes."
I mean, he's not wrong - the capital gains vs income tax structure is the ultimately regressive and heavily contributes to wealth inequality. I wonder if he saw the riots in France and had a moment of clarity in "that could be my store they'd be burning."
It’s almost like capitalism selects for sociopathic tendencies…
From a European point of view he seems to read the writing on the wall.
As much as US sociopaths take from the country and the people at their will and mostly violating laws and lying, the French youth is starting to do the same, not using the violence of power but rather physical violence. But what's the difference? Not that I agree with that but I also do not agree with the former either.
Obviously Scott has a sense of where this could lead to.
"He was then asked if he would be willing to redistribute some of his wealth to United employees earning far less than he does, to which he responded “of course not,”"
This is WAY too common with our self-righteous elites today. They all say we should do X, then when asked if they would personally participate, they say "of course not" without a hint of irony.
Gee, Scott, I wonder why nobody likes people like you?
How much you want to bet this guy also would refuse to participate in a national compulsory service, or his kids? They're too smart and righteous for that.
Will this American provincialist still insist on all things MAGA when the US defaults on its debt?
The funny thing about this, and about all virtue signaling filth, Kirby can go and donate it all right now, 5 mins after the interview or 5 mins before it, to the govt, to a charity, to any particular group of people or cause. No reason to wait 30-40 years if you believe in giving your money away for greater good. Yet he won't, ever, not a chance. He'll keep taking in 20-40-80M every year, not even 2-3-4, but mid-high eight figs, while telling everyone how we're all better off if the govt takes our money.
He could also lower his comp to barely-survivable 2-5-10M and say I donate the rest to the wellbeing of a poor "insert preferred victim group" - yet he won't. United is awesome and he's the main reason why, but holy smokes the guy is just insufferable.
I agree with the compulsory national service part. The only way to heal this country is to bring people from different classes and cultures together so they can see that we are all Americans. We also need the draft again; people would be a lot more cautious about war if their son or daughter was going to fight to prop up the oil companies.
I'm not sure how I feel about agreeing with Scott Kirby, but as someone who spent 20 years in indiustry, 15 in gpvernment and another 6 in education, I feel qualified to say that compulsory public service would yield an electorate that understands how government works and why it fails when it does. I hazard to suggest that we'd get more rational electorial outcomes and more rational policies.
