United 777 Stranded...
 
Notifications
Clear all

United 777 Stranded In Goose Bay For 11+ Hours (And Counting)

75 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
Posts: 39513
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#8894]

Update: Nearly 27 hours later, passengers and crew have returned to Newark. A few blog readers were on the flight, so be sure to read the comments below for some ”fun” details of the experience.

Continue reading: Ouch: United 777 Stranded In Goose Bay For 11+ Hours (And Counting)

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


74 Replies
74 Replies
 John
(@John)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

I'm on this flight (or lack of flight) right now seated by the problematic door. The gist of what happened was a passenger had a seizure about 45 minutes into the flight and they called for a doctor/nurse over the intercom a few times. Fast forward 4 hours into the flight he started having seizures again and they made the decision to turn around and head to Goose Bay to drop the passenger off.

After landing, they tried to disarm the slide raft on door 3R but the lever was stuck. Some crew finally managed after struggling with it to disarm it, the passenger was unloaded and when they were preparing for takeoff again, discovered that the slide would not rearm.

Some mechanics from Goose Bay along with the flight crew tried several times to rearm the slide including opening the door multiple times, spraying deicing fluid in case the issue was due to freezing, but nothing has worked. Now we're just waiting for the rescue flight to come with mechanics and the hope is that they'll be able to fix the door and get us back to Newark.

As of right now they seem to have rescheduled our flight for Monday (originally Saturday) based on checking the United app, but the flight crew said they were bringing customer service agents up here to assist with people's flight plans.


Reply
(@Joe Chivas)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 119

I was on the flight but fortunately they let me off. I'm Canadian though, so it's all good eh?


Reply
(@Alice lekadh)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Hi! I’m the girl in the tweet you reposted. Contact me on Twitter for more details!


Reply
 WTF
(@WTF)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 3

(After two hours on tarmac)

Pilot: "Folks, we're currently in a holding pattern on the tarmac. We expect to have to wait here just a few more minutes."

(One hour later)

Pilot: "Folks, we should be moving any time now. We appreciate your patience."

(One hour later)

Pilot: "Folks, just a few minutes more..."

(One hour later)

Pilot: "Folks..." etc.


Reply
(@AndrewM)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 27

11+ hours on the plane?
That is quite a long time. Any reason why they didn’t let passengers off the plane? Even for few hours to have a rest or walk around in the airport.


Reply
(@alonzo)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 0

Wow, feel bad for the gentleman who had the seizure but no reason to keep the others on the plane. Not cool at all


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

Customs will not allow us to all leave the plane since this is a very small airport and they don't have the logistics to handle a plane full of ~300 people going through customs. Flight crew said if we deplaned it would be a 7 hour process and once started they could not stop, so they're just waiting for the rescue plane. They're allowing 20 people at a time to go to the terminal via bus and walk around for a short period of time to stretch their legs but that's it.


Reply
(@Chip Douglas)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 2

For those on the flight: I'm currently in Goose Bay and am looking to fly nonstop. Can someone ask if there will be room for me to join the rescue flight?


Reply
(@Brian)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 57

N76010 just came out of paint several days ago. It's the first 777-200 (sCO) to be repainted following the merger, as indicated by a different registration font as well as the removal of CO's operating certificate (CALA014A)


Reply
 WTF
(@WTF)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 3

This kind of situation is one more reason why airlines should not be allowed to keep reducing seat pitch and passenger comfort. Can you imagine how claustrophobic this must be for the people imprisoned on that plane for so many hours?


Reply
 Jeff
(@Jeff)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 140

My wife is a physician (Emergency Medicine) and could not believe this story. She said the plane should have been diverted ASAP for a patient having seizures. If they had to burn fuel, then do so, but they could have easily held over Newark and landed there.


Reply
(@dennis-r)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

First of all - what does this say about United's aircraft safety?? Why can't the doors open - what if there was an emergency on board and no one can get off? So what if it's "cold" - they should open on the ground under any circumstances. They should be de-certified.

Secondly, what kind of inhumane ridiculous law is this regarding customs? So they'd rather keep several hundred people cooped up in a plane for 12 hours instead of letting them out for fresh air and a stretch of the legs in the comfort of the terminal just because of their law? Surely, an exception can be made here - it's not a prison ffs!


Reply
(@ivany)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

Good luck to all of those on this flight!


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 26

Ok, I agree that it sucks that they're keeping them on the plane while they're on the ground, but it's -21°F at Happy Valley, and most people would not have winter gear that would suffice for those temperatures (its 45°F in NYC). Also, the flight is blocked at 16hrs, so they'd be on the aircraft for an extremely long time anyway. As one poster said, they are letting small groups (20 at a time) off the aircraft to stretch their legs.


Reply
(@Icarus)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2550

@dennis. Fresh air and stretch their legs !? You’re joking , right

It’s -30 degrees with a winter storm approaching.

For safety reasons it’s better to keep them on board rather than have people die from hypothermia

Goose bay is a military airfield with a very small terminal which does not have capacity to accommodate so many people.

Canadian authorities can only process general aviation aircraft of no more than 15 passengers

Perhaps it’s time the authorities expanded the terminal to accommodate diversions as they are fairly frequent

The crew will time out

There’s a reason why they diverted there and not back to Newark since they knew the reprocussions

@ Jeff your wife may be a physician however she wasn’t there and doesn’t fly a 777


Reply
(@cpyow)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

@WTF - I agree that it is not comfortable in economy, but why do you consider the passengers to be "imprisoned" in a "claustrophobic" situation when on the ground for 11 hours, as opposed to the scheduled 16 hour EWR-HKG flight they intended to be on?


Reply
(@Felix)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 14

The nonsense about customs is BS. It would not have been a 7 hour process since every single person would get back on that plane later on. It's not like anyone would stay in Goose Bay (the people are great but not much to do). They could have had everyone deplane and get into the terminal and they could have waited there instead of a snag seat on a plane for 11 hours.


Reply
 bRad
(@bRad)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 15

This is why they need emergency medical parachutes. Just throw the shaky fella out of the plane above a hospital and keep on to Hong Kong. Maybe the guy should have taken an Uber instead to not inconvenience all of these nice people.


Reply
(@dennis-r)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@icarus, yes fresh air! But more so, as @Felix said, they should be let out into the terminal. Anyway, you sound like a United fanboy, so hopefully you will be on one of their frequent disaster flights sometime soon.


Reply
(@rt777-300)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Does United have an ETOPS exemption, haha? Never sad to see bad press about United, but so sorry for you passengers.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 2

No excuse to land for a passenger having a seizure. The seizure would have eventually passed.

Huge inconvenience to the other passengers and a little selfish.


Reply
(@donna)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

I was once on a Military Charter that refueled at Goose Bay in the winter and even though the stop was only a few hours as I recall, they opened the doors for a few minutes to “freshen the cabin” and I thought we would freeze to death. Fresh air ain’t all that it’s cracked up to be at -25F! I feel sorry for the passengers and crew on this one.


Reply
(@Goose Bay)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

We have a nice terminal, capable of handling 3-400 passengers per day. Its pretty tiny really. And there is no nice cozy jet bridge to take you from the plane to the terminal, it's a 45 degree staircase truck in the cold -46F wind (currently, it's the warmest part of the day now after all). After that, a bus to the terminal, where you could wait for one of the three customs agents..... probably quicker to wait in the plane, and avoid the free frostbite.


Reply
 Rob
(@Rob)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 42

@ John

So you and you Dr. Wife know, UAL nor any other airline does not make the decision to divert or continue an aircraft for medical reasons. All US airlines contract with a company called MedLink for aviation related medical assistance. This company will phone patch to the pilots and a staff Dr. will tell them what to do divert, continue, or what to have the F.A.s do if no other options are available.

And so you know, before you think it is some mom and pop operation MedLink is run with aviation medical specialists and is a subsidiary of John Hopkins.


Reply
(@Zillah)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 3

"Customs will not allow us to all leave the plane since this is a very small airport and they don’t have the logistics to handle a plane full of ~300 people going through customs."

This sounds like BS to me. Let people off the plane but require them to stay in the international area of the terminal so that they never actually enter Canada and, therefore, don't have to go through customs.


Reply
(@Icarus)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2550

@ Dennis never flown united and if you read about every divert to goose bay the story is more or less the same.

Customs are only able to process general aviation aircraft with a capacity of 15 passengers The terminal can’t hold so many passengers comfortably. Most would end up sitting on a concrete floor


Reply
(@robert-r)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

@Icarus, your message is right on point.

I too have been to Goose bay and only in extreme cases can it handle in bounds such as this. Air France A380 is a situation where they knew they were going to be there for an extended period of time. But that was also in September 2017, not January. This is NOT a UAL fault. It was for passenger care that they diverted and passenger safety that they are still on the plane. As a 20 year airline employee, do you really think that the cockpit and inflight crew want to be there too? All the armchair Dr's and pilots need to understand that there are many factors involved.


Reply
(@Chip Douglas)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 2

Just to follow-up, I'm trying to get from Goose Bay to Hong Kong today. Can anyone on the plane now see if I can buy the seat where the guy with the medical issue was sitting for today's rescue flight?? Pls let me know, United's phone reps have no info.


Reply
 Jk
(@Jk)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 7

Rob says:
January 20, 2019 at 11:58 am....."MedLink is run with aviation medical specialists and is a subsidiary of John Hopkins"

Are you from NY? It's JOHNS HOPKINS not John Hopkins


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

@Chip Douglas

There are no planes going to HKG from Goose Bay. They're both going back to Newark


Reply
(@Sarah)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 5

I love how people only think of the passengers, imagine the flight attendants who are trapped with people complaining and demanding all while themselves being trapped and overworked.


Reply
(@Icarus)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2550

@ Robert. Of course many entirely ignore the crew and never thinks they are equally frustrated and somehow immune


Reply
 WTF
(@WTF)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 3

In response to CP@YOW: Because this time they spend stuck on the ground is going to be in addition to the time they spend in flight, not to mention the frustration they're no doubt dealing with. Will they be transferred to a different plane and get to depart, or will they have to sit there while mechanics try to repair the door? (That said, I realize a flight back to Newark isn't as long as the originally intended flight to Hong Kong, so they're fortunate in that respect.)


Reply
(@gboac)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

Too bad they couldn't have diverted to Gander; we all know that Gander could easily handle the passengers on one 777.
Coincidentally I saw "Come From Away" this week. If you haven't seen it, do so, it is the best musical theater I have seen in ages.


Reply
(@Geoff)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

I used to fly military charters and often used to make tech stops in Goose. There are no facilities to handle passengers anywhere near by nor transport to get them there. They are best off on the plane until the rescue flight can get there.


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

@WTF

They did attempt to fix the door but ultimately determined that they will need to replace parts and it would take longer than moving us to the rescue plane.

All passengers have been moved to the new plane via bus and we're just waiting to see if our luggage is being moved to the new plane as well. Last we heard, UA was working with Canadian officials to see if they can move the luggage.


Reply
(@Anshul)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Finally transferred to new aircraft. Hoping to get off in about 30 min. When this ends it will be 26+ hours flight to nowhere. Something that I will remember forever. Remarkable patience by passengers. Few heated arguments early in the night but relatively calm after that. The Aviation terminal is small and you freeze by the time you get to bottom of stairs. Crew kept us fed through the night and was fantastic. Corporate's response could have been much better. Hope they compensate passengers adequately.

For those asking why we could not get off the plane, there are not enough hotels here to accommodate this many passengers and terminal is really small. Temperature inside the plane was OK so I think we were better on the tarmac.

Hoping to get to EWR and put this behind me.


Reply
(@derek-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I wonder if Keflavik, Iceland would have been better. Probably better for the passengers in retrospect but not better for UA.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

@Rob...
JonhS Hopkins?


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

We're finally departing here. Doors are locked and taxiing to the runway. What an adventure...


Reply
(@Pepper Jones)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Obviously, the airline has nothing to do with the size of the terminal or the number of people that particular Canadian Customs station is able to process. They probably only have a couple of agents present and only a few more, beyond that, they could call to come in and assist.

Trust me, as a business owner, there's no way I would allow my customers and staff to endure something like that unless I had no other choice! The very idea that a company would CHOOSE to keep passengers and crew on board the aircraft - if there was another viable option - is ludicrous! Come on, people!


Reply
 All
(@all)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 0

Why does it feel like half the passengers on this flight are OMAAT readers?


Reply
 VL
(@VL)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 15

@ Rob

Seriously? The airline will not listen to a medical professional but just use the tele-doc? Clearly, you are not in medicine. Anyone will tell you that the opinion of someone who’s actually witnessing and is able to assess the patient is heads above any alternative. Additionaly, US carriers in particular will be extra vigilant in risk management against any hint of lawsuits.

As someone who’s been involved in multiple mid-flight emergencies, I can tell you that the crews are very ill-prepared and have a minimum skill set for anything that happens in flight. They can barely collect vitals! Ditto the medicine kits that are on-hand. While the pilot WILL talk to the tele-doc and has to contact them, the final decision rests with him/her on what to do.

Since passengers can no longer enter the cockpit and directly talk to the service, I have relied on telling the FAs exactly what I find and ask to relay it to the ground or, if there’s a lot happening, have actually written out short notes to help communication both in mid-air and on the ground to make things go smoother. At the end of the day, if there’s a qualified professional on the plane that makes a call to divert due to the medical situation, it’s very hard to go against their judgement (and certainly not advised from a med-legal perspective).


Reply
(@Boardingareaflukie)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 34

@John - "There are no planes going to HKG from Goose Bay. They’re both going back to Newark"

I'm seeing this on Flightaware and I'm puzzled. Both planes are 777's. Were passengers transferred to the second 777? If the original aircraft is worthy enough to fly back to Newark, then why did they ferry up a second identical aircraft? Sure they had to get a relief crew up there, but that could've been done with just about any type of smaller aircraft.


Reply
(@Speedbird)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 370
(@Julie Ritt)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

@boardingareaflukie

They were transferred to the second plane and flown back to Newark. Unsure if their luggage was transferred as well. I assume so though, as the second-to-last post from @John said they were waiting to hear if the Canadian authorities would allow them to move the luggage from Plane 1 to Plane 2, but didn't mention it in his last post saying they were going.


Reply
 Zach
(@Zach)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

@Boardingareaflukie
I’m guessing the rescue plane brings some parts to fix the issue.


Reply
(@Lars Jensen)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 6

I wonder why they did not divert to Kangerlussuaq in Greenland. Looking at the map, it must have been much closer.


Reply
(@Kathy Boothby)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

My opinion is this. Those of us that are not on the plane should stay quiet. We are not there seeing what's going on, let alone experiencing it. If there is no hotel for everyone to go stay in and rest up, people might as well stay where its warm. If they were not being fed, that would have been another issue too. But, they were taken care of the best way possible. Sorry that someone got sick and needed to be off that plane. Would you rather keep going and possibly watch that person die? At least it wasn't during Sept 11 when all planes were grounded. No, I wouldn't have been comfortable on that plane but I would have dealt with it knowing that the inconvenios was due to a medical emergency. Life goes on. Time will heal the inconvenios and maybe some passengers made some new friends


Reply
(@dennis-r)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Happy to hear the passengers and crew are finally on their way. However, nobody has touched the issue of why the doors were broken? The EMERGENCY doors... United, like most other US-based airlines, are worse than 3rd world operators.


Reply
 DenB
(@denb)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

Ben,

Please don't refer to such places as "Goose Bay, Canada". It's like saying "Omaha, America". Onetime a flight attendant on my flight home said, as we arrived in Toronto "Have a nice day, here in the Canada area."

Hve a nice day in the United States area.


Reply
(@dander)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

People aren't getting it. Its a small terminal, it likely can't handle more than 50 or so people. The weather there right now will kill you if you aren't prepared. I imagine not many people have their heavy jackets with them. Yes it sucks and maybe Canada and the airlines need to build a bigger terminal, but who pays for it? Its not forever.


Reply
(@John H)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 12

Look. The flight diverted due to a medical issue and then could not leave. What else do you want UA to do? They sent a replacement aircraft after they determined new parts were needed. According to people on the plane, the crew was "fantastic" and kept everyone fed. Tim Hortons provided drinks and snacks to passengers, this must have at some point been requested by the crew. And, they let people off the aircraft into the terminal, which is very small and cannot process a whole 777.


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

We have finally landed in EWR. The luggage *was* all fully transferred since I forgot to mention that in my last comment before departing.


Reply
(@Darwin Charles)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 2

Better to be stuck on the ground with a problem than to discover one in the air!
This is a unique case and could occur anywhere on the planet but assume most of the 300 on boarding are figuring how much they can sue for, and likely more than 300 pit bulls (AKA Lawyers) are waiting to get their hands on the passenger list!

And yes.....when will Americans start realizing that Canada is a country geographically much larger than the USA; perhaps recognize that a weekend in Toronto is exactly that....not a visit to Canada. If so, if someone goes to Miami USA, I guess that person can be an expert on America!


Reply
 Nate
(@Nate)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 295

It does feel all the commenters are on this flight.


Reply
(@Chris Randal)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 4

Perhaps it's in retaliation to Trump's attitude to Canada??


Reply
(@Steven M)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 443

Thanks to the actual passengers who commented here. No thanks as usual to Untied™️


Reply
(@masimons)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

Pretty amazed the luggage was transferred to the rescue plane.
Kudos to the personnel in that weather moving luggage.


Reply
(@stuart-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

"Yes it sucks and maybe Canada and the airlines need to build a bigger terminal, but who pays for it?"

@Dan... Mexico. We will get Mexico to pay for it.


Reply
(@Boardingareaflukie)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 34

@dan FYI, the newer terminal built in 2013 can handle hundreds of passengers.


Reply
(@Callum)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 694

DenB - Many people don't know where Goose Bay is. Pointing out it's in Canada is nothing like saying "welcome to the Canada area", and you'll find it (and every other airport) written that way if you do a flight booking request. Are you dim or just horribly arrogant?

Dennis - No one has mentioned it because it's a stupid point, like the rest of your posts were. Things break - not a single component on any machine is infallible. That should really be basic common sense...


Reply
(@Callum)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 694

Darwin Charles - What is it with the stupid points about what you call Canada on this post? A weekend to Toronto IS visiting Canada. PERIOD.

Saying you've been to Canada neither states nor implies that you've seen the whole country, nor that you're an expert on Canada.Callum


Reply
(@notbad41)
Joined: 5 years ago

Trusted Member
Posts: 52

After 2 hours on a tarmac, I have a panic attack and will be taken out of the plane by paramedics.


Reply
(@Darwin Charles)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 2

Hey Callum....my point is that most Americans are bad with geography and they rarely go to a city.....they go to Canada, regardless of where. You are correct but it is a visit to Canada or to the US, however, I notice that Canadians mention the city in the US they are visiting.


Reply
(@schulteo)
Joined: 5 years ago

New Member
Posts: 0

Where did the guy with the seizure end up- and how is he doing?


Reply
(@James787)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 46

@ VL. You are correct on some points regarding medlink. As a pilot for a major US based airline I can tell you that we are required to call medlink with any medical situation regardless if a qualified personal is on board of not. Certain airplanes also have the ability to patch the call to a handset in the galley area, where an on board medical personal can give his/her credentials to the medlink doctor and they both can arrive at a conclusion. Once that decision with the on board medical personal and medlink is obtained I will then consult with our own network operations to get a list of available airports, weather, and facilities. Once an agreement between myself, the flight crew, dispatch, and medlink has all come together we can start the diversion process. As a pilot I will always take the most conservative option. It’s not as simple as people would like to think and I always appreciate the use of all available resources before forming a decision which will have an impact on everyone on board.


Reply
(@elaine)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 115

@VL - it's not about listening to the tele-doc. it's a complex case which involves quick decisions making in regards to the health of the pax, safety of the flight and emergency capacity at given airport at THAT particular time.
obviously you are not certified aviation medic involved in all the talking with pilots and hospitals and airports, including fast decision makings etc. otherwise you would not even post your above post


Reply
(@Jennifer Ward)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 4

When I read about people being stuck on a plane for 12 hours, I wonder what the consequences would be of leading a mutiny and opening one the doors (that's working that is) and sliding down the chutes. Is this a felony punishable by jail time? At some point it becomes cruel and unusual punishment to be on a plane so long, especially one with overflowing toilets and/or no food, and one could argue that there was justification for escaping. Also, since as in this case it was in a foreign country, would the consequences be more or less?


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

@Jennifer Ward

That would be incredibly stupid. The temperature outside was -20 and with the high winds, the wind chill was -50. The plane was far enough away from any buildings that you would be in danger walking to the terminal without the proper amount of protective layers on. They even bussed us from the one plane to the other which was "only" about 200 feet. Just walking down the stairs to the bus and back up the stairs onto the other plane was quite brutal wearing clothes appropriate for the destination (Hong Kong).

Opening an emergency door and deploying the slide would put EVERYBODY in considerably MORE DANGER than being stuck in a well heated airplane cabin, so I'm glad nobody attempted to do anything like that.

On top of the brutal cold, Goose Bay is both a civilian airport and a Canadian Forces base, so you could probably expect a quick reaction from the military if you attempted to illegally enter Canada.

I know a lot of people were frustrated by being stuck in the airplane, but there is also a lot of exaggeration on Twitter as to the state of things on that plane. The toilets were not overflowing and I don't even remember seeing anybody posting that, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. Food was not dwindling in the way people described. We had been served dinner before the emergency landing, and several hours into the delay they served us breakfast. By morning when the Canadian officials started coming into the airport, they brought a huge resupply of water, sandwiches, muffins, and doughnuts from Tim Hortons.


Reply
(@derek-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Someone, maybe a substitute teacher in Goose Bay, might consider a new business which would resupply passengers with food. They would then contract with airlines for a yearly fee and fee for each use. I wonder if airlines would pay.

Bare bones service would be rapidly order and deliver fast food. Additional service might be blankets. Yet additional service might be to escort 15 business class passengers into town and wait in the person's home/lounge.

I don't know what the charges should be or what the airlines would pay but what if the airlines paid $300 per month and you could get 15 airlines to pay. That would be $4500 per month or $54,000 per year.


Reply
(@callum)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 694

Darwin Charles - Again, your point is stupid. While Americans are generally poor with Geography, I GUARANTEE that every American who visited Toronto for a weekend last year is aware that Toronto is in Canada, and that Canada is not Toronto.

It is PERFECTLY acceptable to say that you are visiting a country, and not specify the city. What you "notice" Canadians generally do is utterly irrelevant - and not something I accept either. The vast majority of Canadians I speak to about going abroad say which country they are going to, not the specific city, especially when it's an obscure place like Goose Bay which virtually no-one has ever heard of...


Reply
 Luis
(@Luis)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Delta flight makes an emergency landing with an engine problem in a remote Alaskan island leaving passengers stranded for 11 hours onboard the plane but somehow that one does not make the headlines. Why is that? The same thing happened with the Dr. Dao incident. Delta had a passenger removed off the plane by dragging down the aisle just weeks before the Dr. Dao incident and not a peep. But UA has a similar story and all of the sudden... well, you know the story.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/delta-flight-from-beijing-to-seattle-lands-on-alaskan-island-due-to-engine-issue-alaska-public-media-reports/?fbclid=IwAR23XnZ-un_43IU6qBt4Ggs-9bl0QeZav4M9tsVgth-XOaN3W-0tgwBHaYo


Reply
(@Jennifer)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

I was on this flight. Finally back from my trip to China and available to comment. We were on the plane for 27 hours only to end up right back where we started. And then we still had our 16 hour flight to Hong Kong after that. So when I read a comment like the following I need you to know that you are minimizing the situation greatly. And as it would happen, our next flight was also delayed and we were kept on the plane for several extra hours again. Overall, not a good experience. Of course, the individual's health was a priority but United definitely could have (and should have) sent a rescue plane much sooner than they did.

CP@YOW says:
January 20, 2019 at 10:54 am
@WTF – I agree that it is not comfortable in economy, but why do you consider the passengers to be “imprisoned” in a “claustrophobic” situation when on the ground for 11 hours, as opposed to the scheduled 16 hour EWR-HKG flight they intended to be on?


Reply