There’s potentially lots of value to having hotel elite status. However, there’s no denying that elite ranks have swelled quite a bit over the years, especially with some programs making it easy to earn top tier status with a credit card.
Continue reading: Hotels Posting Signs With Number Of Elite Guests: Useful, Tacky, Or Both?
Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.
yes, it would be very useful if there were a corporate-managed published list in the app; however, in the current sign-based implementation, it's just property owners fabricating numbers to preemptively excuse their failure to deliver the benefits to which members are entitled.
If I checked into a Marriott that did this, it would be funny to give the front desk a message of my own. For example; “I noticed the sign. Fair enough—just so you know, this hotel isn’t irreplaceable to me either. I have Lifetime Globalist with Hyatt, and there are plenty of good options in this area.”
I've seen Hilton Tokyo (Disney) do this several years back where they listed/welcomed all elites by name on a board (at breakfast) so you could realistically count 'em if you wish. Also common at car rental places (Hertz/Avis?)
Option 4: Don't care.
Thank you for including the ‘Diamond member’ video.
I love it.
Manages expectations.
I would consider it tacky if on the same sign or a sign next to it they also posted something like "ask associate about paid upgrades" or "$300 for a suite upgrade."
It is no different than upgrade lists for airlines which i don't really consider tacky.
Who says the numbers are correct or true? Hotels could change the numbers everyday, print them and stop people from asking about room upgrades. Problem solved.
I think it's tacky of the program to have that many elite members in the first place!
Because misery i.e. being Bonvoyed loves company.
Personally it just proves, especially where mid-upper level status can be obtained by credit card, that it really isn't that special. Personally I'd like to see Marriott cut back on promised Platinum benefits and Hilton cut Gold since there are way too many people at those levels. They crowd lounges and seem to think they are entitled to upgrades when half the hotel likely has that status. I'm lifetime Titanium w Marriott, Hilton Diamond and Hyatt Globalist. I rarely get upgraded to anything meaningful (Hyatt is better than the other 2 but still hit or miss) unless I guarantee it with a suite upgrade or pay to upgrade. If that is MY experience Marriott Platinum and Hilton Gold should have ZERO expectation of anything so just change the benefits to reflect that. Otherwise you just set unreal expectations that hotels can't meet.
I'm not sure how they're useful other than to say "we're busy" please wait.
You should never feel that way when you have elite status.
I miss Starwood 🙁
The competition's business intelligence unit can tell you how reliable the numbers are.
In short: if they are reliable, they're divulging useful information for the competition. If they're not, they're lying to their customers. Either way, they lose.
Firstly, thanks for the laughs !!!
If posting this somewhat tacky information helps manage expections, I am all for it.
I can't remember which airline exec said this but: " If everyone is Elite then no one is Elite".
“But I am a Diamond OMAAT user!”
It their "subtle" way to say... you don't count, we don't give a shit about your status. Don't ask about your upgrade, or free water, etc. etc.
The hotel loyalty pyramid schemes rival the airline ones.. they suck you in, and you think the loyalty is returned.... in general, it's better to price shop across brands and get what you want, instead of paying the highly inflated prices....
That being said, once they suck you in, its like heroin or smoking, its hard to quit.
I am guilty of the same, but getting ready to jump ship on these things.
Tacky.. definitely!
It would be fun if Accor hotels started doing it and made me feel special about being the only Gold staying at illustrious properties such as the Mercure Jakarta Batavia, the Ibis Rotherham East, or that other one in a Spanish provincial city (can't remember which one) that was literally next to the local abbatoir
Yes, but how many FHR bookings are checking in today?
Both? Both is good.
On the one hand, a bit of perspective might not be the worst thing (I'd legitimately be curious as to how many people are at each tier, but I know that at multiple chains they've likely swelled the heck out of their ranks via CC qualification - at least Hyatt /mostly/ makes you spend your way up the ladder...), but I think if they're going to do this, one should expect them to post them at all times - and that means that e.g. if I'm the only Titanium on-site at a given Marriott /and/ I see that there are still suites for sale on the website, I should feel empowered to ask for a manager to ask why I'm not getting the upgrade. (In a reasonable world, that should be something Corporate would tear them a new one on, but we don't live in a reasonable world. Something something net room growth.)
On the other hand, I think someone indicated that it wouldn't be hard for the hotel to inflate the numbers a bit (especially at Marriott, you've got a lot of lousy franchisees who don't want to honor benefits as it is, so I wouldn't put it past them to lie about this as well) and we have no way to falsify their claims, and it /does/ feel tacky.
