Miami Airport's New...
 

Miami Airport's New Concourse K Will Add Six Gates, Open In 2029

29 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
264 Views
Posts: 39733
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#17985]
wpf-cross-image

Miami International Airport (MIA) has just made an exciting announcement. I know what you’re thinking — how could the world’s finest airport become even better? Sorry, I’m kidding… obviously that would be unfair to Cairo!

Continue reading: Miami Airport’s New Concourse K Will Add Six Gates, Open In 2029

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


28 Replies
28 Replies
(@George Romey)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1365

Maybe, just maybe by 2039.


Reply
Diamond
(@uldguy)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Oh, great. Yet another concourse miles away from the perpetually non-working moving walkways heading to the even more distant tram to the rental car center that is for all intents and purposes located in Doral. MIA is one of the least convenient and poorly maintained airports in the U.S.


Reply
Diamond
(@justinb-2)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 377

Seems like a lot of effort and investment for six gates, narrow-body at that… space must be really tight for this to be worth it.


Reply
 Nate
(@Nate)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 596

I would prefer it if they invested in some moving walkways in concourse D. Honestly, that would be the #1 thing AA should do to improve (my) customer experience.


Reply
(@Waynaro)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 25

Ben,

Since you mentioned Concourse K will be replacing Concourse G, it seems there will be no additional capacity to additional passenger volume. Or will they knock down the existing Concourse G and replace it with something new?


Reply
 Pete
Diamond
(@pete-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 312

How about getting skytrain to fully work at all Terminal D stations!!!


Reply
Platinum
(@brandote)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 48

I’ll never understand the MIA hate. Sure, it’s a terrible airport. But it’s so much better than DFW or CLT.


Reply
 305
(@305)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 431

Moving walkways are a thing of the past in airports. They create a wall between the concourse and retail operations. The terminal operators hate them because of this


Reply
 Pete
(@Pete)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1441

Six whole gates, huh? Wow. What an innovation. The question remains as to why they'd be adding new flavours when they can't even get vanilla right?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 39733

@ brandote -- Agree on CLT, disagree on DFW. At least at DFW, all the terminals are connected airside, and one of the terminals is nice. That's more than can be said about MIA!


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 39733

@ Waynaro -- Yeah, Concourse G actually has more gates than Concourse K will have, so I'm a bit confused there as well. Does anyone know what's going on, because that's potentially a significant reduction in capacity. Given the goal of 77 million passengers per year, how exactly is that supposed to be achieved?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 39733

@ Nate -- Yep, as pointed out by 305, it's no coincidence that moving walkways are becoming less common. They're not good for business, and airports are shopping malls that just happen to have gates.


Reply
 JB
(@JB)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 832

@Ben @Waynaro - As far as I know, Concourse G at MIA is rarely used for its full capacity. Very few airlines operate out of that concourse, and they can easily be reacommodated in other concourses with the current setup. Its essentially the concourse for airlines who can't find space in other concourses at MIA.

I am curious whether they rebuild something else in that space though, and I assume that will be the case once Concourse K is finished.


Reply
 Hugo
(@Hugo)
Joined: 1 year ago

Posts: 3

Just give me a direct flight MIA to HDN OR NRT already.


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 7

What? MIA and CLT are not horrible airports. I enjoy them and they are easy to get around. Well CLT was before the construction and based on the UA portion of Concourse A, it will be once completed.


Reply
(@ImmortalSynn)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 921

One thing that should probably be clarified (at least based on the marketing designs they show) is that the new concourse will be able to handle widebodies and likely will be marked for them, but they'll block at least two gates if more than two widebodies are at the terminal.

Again, based on what they're showing, it can concurrently service 6 narrowbodies, or 3 widebodies + 1 narrow, or lower combinations of the latter.


Reply
(@bigjinla)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 536

Modernization in Action is a real project?! I just thought it was a fancy way of saying "this moving sidewalk is permanently out of order."


Reply
Platinum
(@brandote)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 48

@Ben fair enough, but I think terminal D at DFW gets too much credit for being “nice”….nicer, yes. I think what makes an airport good is too heavily weighted on passenger experience. E.g., everyone hates on Miami but Miami has great accessibility to downtown and Miami Beach (DFW does not). LAX has a terrible curbside situation, but the airfield has four parallel runways and nearly perfect weather year round (LAX is never given credit for this). So yeah terminal D is nice and you’ll prob spend a lot of time there due to terrible Dallas weather and a generally shitty AA operation.


Reply
(@WestCoastFlyer)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 215

Another great opportunity for the Perputal Corruption Pit of Indulgence known as MIA. (HT to Holly Hegeman).


Reply
 Jack
(@Jack)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 483

MIA exists to make LAX look good


Reply
Diamond
(@omarsidd)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 369

Nice to see *something* new (anything) coming to MIA. The airport design is just awful (though I vaguely recall it being even worse before the current version of concourse D was built), cramped where it should be spacious, sprawling in all the wrong ways, a depressing large-scale primitive experience for visitors.

Watch them assign Spirit to this prime new real estate lol


Reply
(@Rozellevm)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 43

$20 says is finished in 2049 lol they can’t even fix the leaks in the roof and flooding in the terminals


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6086

Konkourse K is designed for Komrades in Kuba waiting for all those Kargo.


Reply
 JS
(@JS)
Joined: 1 year ago

Posts: 1

@Ben their plan is to build Concourse K (~2029), which facilitates tearing down G (~2027-2033). Once G is torn down, they'll build a new Concourse F in its place (~2035), to allow for the demolition of the existing F and widen the aprons between E-new F, and new F-H to allow for better aircraft movements.

Concourse K will also include lounge space.

https://www.miami-airport.com/capital_improvement.asp


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 39733

@ JS -- Good info, thank you! I updated the post to reflect that.


Reply
 Russ
Gold
(@russ)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I do not see how MIA is better connected than DFW.

Yes, MIA has a train to downtown Miami that appears to take about 40 minutes.

DFW has trains to all parts of Dallas via DART as well as direct rail service to Fort Worth. The silver line of DART will go directly from DFW to Plano.

Parking at DFW is readily available in all terminals which is great for O&D pax and the airport is so massive that it has dual freeway entrances at the North and South sides.

I will say I prefer the rental car train at MIA to terminal buses at DFW as a nonresident and it looks like the parking options for the garage are actually a bit cheaper than DFW.


Reply
Gold
(@gshlgb)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

LAX should have its "curbside" issue fixed 1st quarter of 2026 when the Automated People Mover (APM) is functional and the rail lines come on line.

Drop offs outside of the "horseshoe" and a ride in on the APM.


Reply
 JCC
(@JCC)
Joined: 3 months ago

Posts: 1

How about first expanding the highway 836 exit to MIA? It’s the most ridiculous design I have seen. The highway exit starts with 2 lanes and then merging into 1 lane (to give way to another non-airport local exit) for a mile before expanding again to 2 +lanes. Traffic jam ALL THE TIME!


Reply