SriLankan Airlines ...
 

SriLankan Airlines Captain Locks Copilot Out Of Flight Deck

15 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
444 Views
Posts: 40492
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#17040]
wpf-cross-image

A SriLankan Airlines captain has been grounded, after he reportedly locked the first officer out of the flight deck, in a move intended to teach her a lesson…

Continue reading: SriLankan Airlines Captain Locks Copilot Out Of Flight Deck

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


14 Replies
14 Replies
Diamond
(@nelson-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 268

Wathever the reason that guy had, after what happened before (I'm just thinking of the intentional Crash of German Wings a few years ago in Southern France) that guy should be fined and baned to enter a plane for life, let alone a cockpit.


Reply
(@Duck Ling)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 518

I am really shocked that Sri Lankan would only have two pilots on a flight from SYD to CMB. Most airlines have an extra pilot on flights over 9/10 hours.


Reply
Diamond
(@uncleronnie)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 1262

Dumb to lock everyone out. Should have invited a flight attendant to sit in the cockpit until they landed, then make the first officer sit outside (in coach) and think about what she did.


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2697

"...make the first officer sit outside (in coach) and think about what she did."

This isn't kindergarten.

We have no idea why the FO couldn't wait, but personal "emergencies" do happen, and we have no idea why she couldn't wait. I suggest she be given the benefit of the doubt until the investigation is complete.


Reply
(@Dan77W)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 195

Why are you assuming there weren’t 3? This obviously happened en route (over the course of a few minutes) when if a 3rd pilot was being carried they would ideally be fast asleep in their “rest facility”.


Reply
Gold
(@michael-5)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 79

"The logic for having two people in the cockpit is primarily to prevent a pilot with a mental health issue from taking control of the aircraft, given that we’ve seen a fair number of pilot suicides over the years, when they were alone in the cockpit."

That's a nice side effect of the policy, but not the primary reason. A second person needs to be in the cockpit primarily to open the door for the second pilot in the event that the pilot remaining in the cockpit becomes incapacitated, such as a cardiac event or stroke.

Let's be honest... a pilot with mental issues could have both engines shut down before a flight attendant who came up to the cockpit even realizes anything is happening. She can't stop him from doing that, but she can let the other pilot back up if he does.


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40492

@ Michael -- It's my understanding that on most jets there's a code to enter the cockpit. If entered correctly, there's a chime in the cockpit, so the person inside can either accept or reject it. However, if neither is done, then the door automatically opens 30 seconds later. That would seem to deal with cockpit incapacitation issues. Is there something I'm missing?

Regarding pilots with mental health issues being able to do something when someone else is in the cockpit, that's theoretically true. But look at all the incidents we've seen over the years where a pilot intentionally took down a plane. In each situation, as far as I know, it was when they were alone in the cockpit.


Reply
Diamond
(@tim-dunn)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 7524

Someone is going to find out that there are other lesson givers in his organization


Reply
 Cam
(@Cam)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 1

The First Officer needs to be grounded until given opportunity to share her side of the story. Was she in danger of having a bladder/bowel accident and exited asap? Why did she not follow protocol? Etc. Is this a power issues over gender and role in sri lankan culture?


Reply
(@Dumb Tim)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 1

Shut up Tim!


Reply
Diamond
(@laxlonghorn)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Certainly irresponsible and worthy of reprimand on both parts, but the captain's action was more egregious and a potential immediate safety threat.


Reply
 Pete
(@Pete)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1528

If this synopsis of events is accurate it seems that they both behaved inappropriately. Flight crews must operate their aircraft in accordance with the operating manual, company policy, and the law. In this case both the FO and captain have apparently violated company policy. I'm not certain why he's the only one who's grounded.


Reply
(@Steven E)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 551

I don’t understand this at all, the First Officer wouldn’t have just “bolted” from her seat . There would have been an interphone call made to the Cabin crew ( surely) that the F/O was needing to leave the flight deck and they needed a F/A to relieve her , so to speak, another story that hasn’t been fully explained and another reason I’d never fly with them again as my last flight was awful in all aspects


Reply
(@FlyerDon)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 410

The flight attendant is in the cockpit primarily to look through the viewing port, to verify it’s one of the pilots trying to get back into the cockpit, before they open the door.


Reply