Japan Airlines Adds...
 

Japan Airlines Adds Six Haneda Flights To The US

24 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
108 Views
Posts: 39800
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#10189]
wpf-cross-image

When it comes to Tokyo Airports, Haneda is significantly more convenient than Narita, since it's closer to the city. Historically a majority of long haul flights have been into Narita due to Haneda being significantly slot restricted, but that has slowly been changing. For example, recently US airlines got access to an additional dozen slots…

Continue reading: Japan Airlines Adds Six Haneda Flights To The US

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


23 Replies
23 Replies
 ECM
(@ECM)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 22

Dang it. I'm booked on JL9 out of Chicago next year, after the change of airport, using AA miles in First. Do you think I'll have any issues with the change? Or will AA/JL simply shift my reservation as is (Two F tickets on the same flight are hard to come by!) and honor it?


Reply
(@ricky-dee)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

So the NRT-JFK flight will be cancelled and replaced? Your NYC section doesn’t explicitly state that but the comment in the “Bottom Line” implies so.


Reply
(@eponymous coward)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 445

Huh. I’m on an AS F award for JL 61 in May. I hope I get switched to JL 15 instead of downgraded to J.


Reply
(@Daniel)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 280

That ORD flight usually has decent award availability so interesting that there's demand for a second service.


Reply
(@henry LAX)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 192

After all of the announced changes commence, LAX-Tokyo becomes :

Star................ = 6 total : 3 HND 3 NRT
oneworld ..... = 4 total : 3 HND 1 NRT
DL / Skyteam = 1 total : 1 HND

I think DL might feel the immense pressure at LAX


Reply
 emag
(@emag)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 16

I'm booked on JL 61 in F on the exact day that it is changing to a 787, 3/29. Booked with AA, really hoping I can get switched too!


Reply
(@Peter)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 39

11 daily flights between LAX - Tokyo? That's quite a bit of capacity. I expect downgauges and eventual cutbacks.

Its second only to Tokyo - HNL, which can support a frigging A380 because of how many Japanese tourists visit the islands. Even one of the neighbor islands supports 2x daily between KOA-TYO.


Reply
Gold
(@terence)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

It's interesting that JL will fly to JFK exclusively from HND while NH still split between HND and NRT for JFK, even with partner UA flying EWR-NRT. The HND-JFK seems to be for the intra-Asia connections, HND-DEL for example (along with the SFO-HND feed)


Reply
(@Jinxed_K)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 71

Some of these new flights actually arrive early enough that I may be able to catch the last connection to Kushiro without having to spend the night in Tokyo by taking a connection in the US...
(Current BOS-NRT flight arrives around 4pm which does not give me enough time to catch the 5:45pm, I know there's flights to CTS well into the night, but that leaves me on the other side of Hokkaido from where I want to be.)


Reply
(@M Casey)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 93

Will the last airline leaving NRT, please turn off the lights.


Reply
Diamond
(@tim-dunn)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 7465

@henry LAX
First, all of those NRT flights have to remain viable in order for about 1/3 of those Tokyo flights to matter to Delta. Given the significant amount of capacity to HND, it is hard to understand why there will be many high value passengers that will choose NRT if they are local Tokyo passengers. NH/UA and AA/JL are trying to operate two complementary and largely duplicative longhaul hubs at two different airports in the same city, one of which has far better geography, something no other airline does anywhere in the world.
Second, US to Tokyo flights have long operated in a fairly narrow time band, not the much larger degree of departure choices that are being proposed even at HND. There is no assurance that business passengers will choose flight times that are markedly different from what has historically been offered.


Reply
(@hmiller1011)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@Tim Dunn,

The new overnight 1:30am-ish departures to HND from JFK may be historically unproven for the NYC-Tokyo market, but they’ll be in line with the departure times to virtually all of the other major Asian airlines’ hubs such as:

- Cathay Pacific to HKG (77W);

- China Airlines & EVA Air to TPE (both 77W; CI NOT daily);

- China Eastern to PVG (also operates daytime departure, both 77W);

- Korean Airlines to ICN (KE also has midday departure from JFK; midday 380 year round; 1am-ish 380 summer or currently 74H, depending on season);

- Philippines Airlines to MNL (359; NOT daily).

So, while longtime O & D flyers may be unaccustomed to departure times at 1:30am-ish from JFK, based on others’ service patterns, apart from being competitive for onward connections that arrive in nearby cities before midday, if not even earlier, offered by other Asian based airlines through their hubs, it also offers O & D business flyers the opportunity for a full-day’s work, plus even a business dinner in NYC, with a predawn arrival in Tokyo that allows for a full-day’s work on the other end instead of the current and historic schedules of morning, midday or mid-afternoon departures from NYC with arrivals in Tokyo smack in the middle of the day, mid-afternoon or evening as late as just after 9pm, all followed by the long trek from Narita to downtown Tokyo!


Reply
Diamond
(@tim-dunn)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 7465

@Howard Miller
thanks for your reply.
I am aware of overnight flights to other destinations in Asia. My point is that this has not been the norm to Tokyo which is not only not a growing market but that some of the carriers will be dividing their demand between an already-existing flight.
I'm struggling to understand how all of this excess capacity including at times that have not been used to/from Tokyo is going to be filled at the same yields, even while trying to keep NRT alive as a connecting hub.

We will have to see... but I suspect we are more likely to see the migration of high yield traffic in London from Gatwick to Heathrow when LHR opened to all US airlines, even w/ those people that argue LGW might be more convenient for some people.


Reply
 BRMM
(@BRMM)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 73

Odd that AA pulled ORD-NRT back to just a few days a week, from daily, and yet JAL plans to add a second daily flight. I wonder if this spells the end of AA's few-days-a-week flight.


Reply
(@Misplaced Texan)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

JAL is going to Love Field? Big news!


Reply
(@alan barnett)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

Lucky,

Am i understanding this right, that the all JFK flights will operate out of Haneda?


Reply
(@hmiller1011)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@Tim Dunn,

Hi Tim!

Yes, the planned 1:30am-ish JFK departures to Haneda are vastly different than current & prior service patterns to date, and as such, may be unfamiliar to longtime road warriors, but I suspect that over time some of the advantages highlighted in my above comment (full day’s work in NYC; possibility of business dinner or dinner with one’s family before heading overseas; 4:45am predawn arrival at HND for either full day’s work on arrival, or onward connections with morning arrivals for domestic Japan connections, or intra-Asia cities for flights up to 5 hours that allow for midday or earlier arrivals versus the evening or late night arrivals to date for connections) will be borne out as there are unique historic reasons that explained the absence of the “red eye” flights to Tokyo versus those operated by other Asian-based airlines.

Among them are:

Since it’s opening in 1978 until only last year (2018), Narita Airport had a strict nighttime curfew for all flights (departures or arrivals) from 11pm until 6am, with exceptions for arrivals until 12mid due to bad weather and special situations only granted in recent years.

So, with Haneda only being reopened for intercontinental flights in recent years, and at vastly restricted hours and/or very few slots at that until next year, these 1:30am-ish departure times from JFK were not possible since the 6am arrival window translated to 2:45-3am departure time from JFK, which made that uncompetitive versus airlines with hubs elsewhere, or possibly resulting in battling rush hour for the long trek for O & D traffic heading to Tokyo (I have not been to Tokyo, so cannot speak from experience when noting this; but any 6am arrival would suggest heading to Tokyo around 7am...).

So, Narita’s curfew may have been a significant impediment to 1:30am-ish departures from JFK until now.

That, plus in 1978, when Narita opened, (IIRC) only Pan Am operated nonstops between JFK and Tokyo using its Boeing 747-SPs that neither Japan Air Lines (as it was called until restructuring at the beginning of this decade), nor Northwest Orient (as it was called back then) had in their fleets, and instead operated 1-stop flights on this route.

So, with JFK-Tokyo nonstops barely existing when Narita opened in 1978, and that airport having a rigid curfew in effect until only last year, the concept of the overnight, 1:30am-ish red eyes to Tokyo from NYC were not offered due to market specific government devised/politically motivated policies that largely predates even the widespread operation of nonstop flights between the two leading world cities.

So, perhaps with clever marketing touting these new “business-traveler friendly” timed departure times from JFK, and early morning (pre-dawn) arrival times that allow for a full day’s work in Tokyo, or onward connections that arrive midday or earlier instead of dinner time until much later in years’ past/yet still, there just might be a big payoff for these new, overnight, departure times that the market might find exotic at first, but in time, comes to embrace when given the success of many other Asian-based airlines that have long operated flights that depart JFK for their hubs around 1am-ish and arrive as the sun rises in Asia the next morning!

Or maybe people are so set in their ways, that these flights will quickly revert back to their historic daytime departure times in NYC and arriving the next afternoon and evening in Tokyo?

We shall see...

But yes, I agree, as most USA flights shift to Haneda, it’s hard to imagine Narita not becoming the “Gatwick of Tokyo” just as quickly happened after the very restrictive Bermuda 2 bilateral air services treaty was lifted to facilitate full implementation of the EU-USA Open Skies Treaty that requires access be made to all but two US-based carriers that until then were forced to use the ugly, unwanted & all but orphaned step-child, Gatwick Airport if they wanted to serve London at all!


Reply
 Matt
(@Matt)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 45

Wow I booked SFO-HND in First for the Olympics because the LAX-NRT flight booked up. I would’ve been so pissed if I booked LAX and my flight was downgraded. Hopefully I can change my flight to the new LA one when it opens!


Reply
(@hmiller1011)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

In the above, should be “that required access be made at London Heathrow to ALL US-based carriers (instead of just the two allowed during the very restrictive Bermuda 2 era) that until then were forced to use...Gatwick Airport if they wanted to serve London at all.”

With apologies for the garbled copy there!


Reply
(@Harley)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 27

JAL will likely fly one plane from NRT to ORD and fly back to HND, vice versa, so the plane won't sit at ORD for 20 hours, just like how ANA operates right now.


Reply
 Alex
(@Alex)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

JL7/8 also sits in BOS for 19hrs. Arrives around 5pm and leaves around noon the following day. Nothing new.


Reply
(@melglobus)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Was flying in May 2020 on JL9 NRT-ORD in J connecting from MEL, got moved to JL16 HND-LAX (still in J) with connection on AA to ORD, getting me in about 10hrs later into ORD. Bit annoying having to get myself across Tokyo and having to deal with LAX, on the upside get a half-day in Tokyo! Don’t know why I wasn’t offered the NRT-LAX flight though?


Reply
(@Rebecca Hennard)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

I am fed up with this because my Jakarta flight was cancelled so I fly into Narita and out of Haneda to JFK with a 13 hour delay. So, thanks JAL, for a 13 hour wait, costs for food, costs for transport and the need to get luggage, drag it halfway across Japan and stand in line to recheck, plus lose 24 hours of my holiday. Absolutely lousy shitty deal.


Reply