Let's face it.
We need to eliminate humans from both positions. All these needless errors that on a perfect storm would lead to catastrophe.
But in this case, obviously El Al pilots are never wrong.
Oof. Apparently, 'the struggle is real'...
Yes, do make it about what the Bible said the Jews were promised. There isn't enough antisemitism without making any incident the fault of all the Jews.
There was one other item missing from the summary. ATC said "2,000" and ElAl 7H went to 4,000. When he switched to TRACON(?) he said he was at 4,000 heading 130 and was not told to descend to 2,000.
Then when he called TWR again at 3,000 I'm entirely unsure when he was cleared to descend OR why the "typical hating controller" didn't bitch ElAl was 1,000ft ABOVE where he was told to go.
The abbreviation FOD (Foreign Object Debris) isn't a term in the AIM or FARS. It exists in some FAA Circulars for ground/maint ops, not TWR and flight ops. The correct method is to communicate in English WHAT is on the runway, such as in the initial report "Animal on RWY 4". Nobody said goose until TWR made that out of whole clothe, but calling it FOD was wrong.
On any given day a 777 captain is going to be considerably more intelligent & capable than anyone working the JFK Tower. If there's any "bad piloting", as Ben refers to it, then it's up to the controller to use internationally standardised ATC terminology to ensure that their instructions have been clearly understood, like controllers would at Guarulhos, Bole, or Pudong. This clown failed to do so.
When the controller said, “I don’t know, I’m not sure”, I'm fairly certain he thought he was talking to SV021 and answering his question.
What a cluster.
