EasyJet's New Uniforms Are Made Of... Plastic Bottles?!

Plastic clothes on people doing sweaty work. What could possibly go wrong?

Kudos to EasyJet. More companies should find innovative ways like this to combat the effects of climate change!

Nothing new here... companies such as Patagonia have been making clothing out of recycled items for years (decades?). While I always take these announcements with a grain of salt, good for Easy Jet as it is the first corporate mandated announcement I'm aware of.

At least they’re not short sleeved shirts with vests like that Icelandic airline.

Exactly my reaction!
Though likely they were already wearing plastic (polyester) anyway

two questions
1. how will they react in a fire - melt?. Wool or cotton are much better fibres and they are natural
2. given my artificial fibre clothes smell bad after one day how will these smell after a long day in the air. Wool or cotton win again

seems like yet another case of a publicity department applying spin over substance.

You bring up a great point, these artificial clothes smell terrible and normal wash isnt good enough to get into these micro fibers. I have to steam wash and use extra hot water to clean my athletic-ware that is made from these recycled plastics. The amount of extra energy needed to wash these types of clothes every single week is far more than anything gained by recycling a couple of plastic bottles.

Chick-fil-A does the same thing with their restaurant team member uniforms. There’s even a little patch on one of the arms that mentions how many plastic bottles were used to make each polo. As a former team member and manager, I can attest that they are indeed comfortable and flexible!

Hi Ben,

This isn’t new or even something novel. Recycled polyester has been around now for a long time and most companies now manufacture with it. I am on the textile industry and in all the Jean fabric we produce we do not use virgin polyester anymore. Companies like Target for example have been using recycle Poly on their clothing for a while Now. Sounds exciting but it really isn’t. Also there is no price difference for what they are doing.

@Lucky

Most clothing today is made from PET fibers. PET is the acronym for polyester, which is a plastic. A lot of recycled PET comes from bottle grades, since they are cleaner and typically clear. Fibers extruded from PET are then woven with other fabrics (60/40 Cotton/Polyester for instance) for strength and durability. All sports wear are made from PET. Great marketing for something that is altogether common.

@Serge T

Since you are the closet to an 'insider', does these process/equipment cost more to produce the same piece of garment?
In other words, is it cheaper for Nike to manufacture recycled bottle shirts?
If yes, WTF are all these company charging more for these environmental friendly shirts?

I am willing to play my part in recycling stuff, but if they are going to scam me for this, I'd rather go the cheaper disposable straight to landfill route.

As a current Chick-fil-A customer, I don't really care how many plastic bottles were used to make each polo.
As long as the sandwich are crazy amazing, I'm still going to overpay for your sandwiches and hate you every time I want to eat chicken and realize it's Sunday.

There actually isn't much of a price difference because additives, toners and other colorants are often required to create PET fiber of similar quality from recycled content to PET fibers made of virgin PET. In addition, washing, sorting and other processes in the recycling chain add expenses. Mostly though, the reliable and consistent supply of recycled plastics (aka PCR) is actually very small, and often demanding a premium depending on use. Most companies are switching to rPET and other recycled plastics for their sustainability initiatives rather than cost savings.

However, as the source for recycled materials become more widely available, we should expect costs to decrease, although not that much lower than the virgin material.

Anyways, the cost of plastic is not the most significant contribution to the clothing industry.

LOL @Kent

Thanks for the answer which sounded like a company spokesperson. Good one, you actually deflected my question with a confusing answer. At first it sounds a little cheaper, then you throw in unreliably supply and now costs a premium.

So is cost of (additives, toners and other colorants)+(washing, sorting and other processes)+(recycled content) cost of (PET fibers made of virgin PET)

And yes, I'm not saying cost of plastic is the most significant contribution. (Is it political lobbying to approve child labor?)
I'm asking does it cost a shirt manufacturer more or less to make a shirt with recycled materials.
Because Nike is charging me more for an almost identical jersey but made from a lot more recycled materials.
I am happy to pay more if it costs Nike more. But I will be pssd if Nike is ripping customers with environmental excuses. Or I'm paying more to marketing not sustainability.

@Eskimo

Your question does not have a simple answer. I don't think there was anything confusing about my answer. If you are looking for simple answers, may I suggest you consult the Magic 8 Ball.

However, to appease you: It costs Nike more, today, to make clothes from recycled plastics.

To answer your next question: No, they don't care if you want to buy the cheaper alternative made from virgin PET.

On the topic of plastics - I own a company which is a major manufacturer of polyolefins and styrenics. Not long ago we figured out that the off spec material - aka scrap - that none of our customers would accept was perfectly acceptable for some of the major aircraft interior manufacturers. The best part is that we could charge 15x-20x for material that was worthless. For that reason solely I love the airline industry. I don’t care if airlines go bust as long as they keep building more planes. We even generate this scrap on demand now just so we can sell it to them with 80-90% margins! No wonder the interiors of aircraft look like shit