Futuristic Hotel In...
 

Futuristic Hotel Indigo Changi Airport Opening 2028

11 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
599 Views
Posts: 41017
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#16339]
wpf-cross-image

Singapore Changi Airport (SIN) is already regarded as one of the world’s best airports, and it just keeps getting better. The airport will be getting another landside hotel, which looks pretty swanky.

Continue reading: Futuristic Hotel Indigo Changi Airport Opening 2028

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


10 Replies
10 Replies
 Alex
(@Alex)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 140

Stayed at the YOTEL two weeks ago. While convenient, it’s not particularly pleasant as many of the rooms are poorly ventilated and have mould.


Reply
(@Niccolo)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

You mean net zero/zero carbon emission ?

Zero energy just does not make any sense since the hotel definitely needs ‘energy’ to run


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6518

You understand zero carbon but not zero energy?

If a hotel "definitely needs ‘energy’ to run" then a power source "definitely produces ‘carbon’ to generate"

And even the whole carbon thing is a all fake. But somehow they were able to spin it in a positive way.
You plant trees for ever carbon you burn and all is well.
So does a doctor have a right to murder for ever life that doctor saves?
Or better yet, can you buy a "save life" credit from a bunch of doctors and become a legal hitman?
Most f**** up logic ever.


Reply
(@Jackson)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 105

Zero Energy LMAO. FYI Solar power is "energy" I think Ben is too woke to understand basic scientific concepts anymore.


Reply
Diamond
(@david-7)
Joined: 6 years ago

Member
Posts: 1038

Poor analogy. Energy is fungible, human lives are not.


Reply
(@yyc-zrh)
Joined: 4 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Eskimo, in case you're not trolling:
I'm sure we all learned about the carbon cycle in school. Reducing carbon emissions isn't about eliminating carbon because that doesn't work. The sum of carbon on Earth is always the same. The purpose of reducing carbon emissions is reducing the amount of carbon that is in the atmosphere creating a greenhouse effect. Planting trees moves the carbon from the atmosphere into the tree itself through photosynthesis, until the tree burns of course.


Reply
Diamond
(@jimmy-k)
Joined: 6 years ago

Member
Posts: 70

"Naturally ventilated corridors"? You mean they'll open the windows?!


Reply
 Sam
(@Sam)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 187

You're such a weirdo.


Reply
Gold
(@chandan-bhat)
Joined: 6 years ago

Member
Posts: 152

Hey Lucky,

Somewhat unrelated, but they're finally building a new passenger terminal at DWC.

https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/aviation/2024/04/28/dubai-constructing-new-35bn-passenger-terminal-at-al-maktoum-airport/


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6518

@David

Who determines that?
Destroying the planet is fungible?
But non fungible humans don't need a planet to live?
Poor argument.

@YYC-ZRH
You are correct, but you're missing the whole point.
But I'm not surprised that you think when I use the word carbon it literally meant the element carbon. Since these days PC has made the choice of words always an issue to distract what is really the real issue.


Reply