Etihad Airways Expa...
 

Etihad Airways Expanding Airbus A380 Fleet: Nine Jets Set To Fly

19 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
465 Views
Posts: 40245
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#14352]
wpf-cross-image

Here’s an exciting update for those of us who love the Airbus A380…

Continue reading: Etihad Airways Expanding Airbus A380 Fleet: Nine Jets Set To Fly

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


18 Replies
18 Replies
Gold
(@brianyyz)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 25

I’d say back to JFK. YYZ is peculiar in that the UAE is highly restricted in total flights, so it makes sense to fly your largest craft there.


Reply
(@venkatesh)
Joined: 1 year ago

Posts: 1

I suggest to stay back and enjoy the city because once the times goes never comes back so set back and relax and have night travel and have a safe journey and choose the correct air craft


Reply
Diamond
(@proximanova)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 183

Small correction, Ben: A6-APE is already flying. It is A6-APA that will be scrapped. EY’s A380 fleet will be even better than QR’s, since 9/10 will be in the air compared to 8/10 at QR.

BA remains the only airline not to have retired even a single A380, not counting NH’s small fleet of three A380s.


Reply
(@Water)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 21

I see the extra two planes being used to cities like New York and Sydney

Long distance , high traffic and good connecting traffic for Etihad airways


Reply
Diamond
(@missingscurrah)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 58

I'd love to see them back in SYD but I wonder if the staggered return could see an extra mid haul destination/frequency in northern summer 2026 followed perhaps by another in early 2027. An upguage of the 4th LHR service to the A380 to offer a consistent product? Double daily to CDG? Or perhaps another market - looking at A380 capable airports where they currently fly their higher capacity A350s and 777s could potentially lend us to a MAN, NRT, AMS, BKK or perhaps more flights to India. Time will tell, very good news nonetheless.


Reply
 DenB
(@denb)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1044

Nice to see 2 daily A380s with top-grade F flying daily from my hometown YYZ. I've been positioning to ORD/NYC for decades; nice to see my American friends positioning to my hometown for a change. Ben hinted recently he'll be reviewing The Residence soon. I'll take a bet on the route...


Reply
 NS
Diamond
(@ns)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 200

Asiana also brought all of their six A380s back - maybe this too was a small fleet to be not counted? Otherwise those three airlines seem to be the only ones.


Reply
 Lee
(@Lee)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 1092

Clearly, Etihad has figured out the economics of the A380. As such, after these ships are back in service, what would be incredibly interesting is if Etihad buys retired or underused A380s and expands its A380 service. You heard it here first.


Reply
Diamond
(@proximanova)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 183

Sorry, I wasn’t aware that Asiana brought all of them back; I thought one was always parked. Having flown an OZ A380 myself on the hop to NRT a couple of months back, I should’ve known better!


Reply
(@Love 380s as long as you R not in economy)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 386

Is it worth it to start building them again? there seems to be a nice size Demand.


Reply
 DenB
(@denb)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1044

Spoke too soon. Doesn't make Ben's Etihad fiasco my fault, tho'.


Reply
 DenB
(@denb)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1044

Definitely not. They're starting their old ones up because it's all they can get their hands on. What the carriers really want is 777x, A350-1000, A321XLR etc. Supply is so backlogged, carriers are flying anything they can.

btw I love your handle. When Emirates began A380 service to YYZ years ago, a journo did a piece on the experience. YYZ in those days had no multiple-jetbridge gates, so all pax boarded through one single door, regardless of aircraft type. The reporter said that upon disembarking in YYZ it was 75 minutes from the moment the first pax left the plane, to when she did.

I may try it someday in F but Y? Not curious.


Reply
 DenB
(@denb)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1044

I'll bet strongly against that. they're not flying them because they prefer them to other types; they're flying A380 because all new Airbuses are backordered, Boeing's in meltdown, demand is roaring and they've got the wretched things sitting in the desert. It was the best of all the bad options. If they could replace each one with a 777x tomorrow, they'd scrap them faster than you can say "beached".


Reply
(@Paul Reynolds)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 9

I hope the Etihad A380 flies to JFK again, it would be sorry if it didn't fly to the USA. Flying medium haul to CDG, LHR and Singapore is not long enough to experience such an airplane.


Reply
 Gene
(@Gene)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 22

Spot on!


Reply
(@ImmortalSynn)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 951

Which is precisely why it makes less sense to fly it here. NYC passengers didn't pay substantially higher fares than London/Paris, yet is almost twice the distance and fuel burn.

So if you're Etihad, and you're getting similar fares by flying the aircraft 7hrs, as you're getting by flying it 13hrs; which one are you going to prefer? Not a hard choice.


Reply
 Al
(@Al)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 201

Why are they only being brought back in 2026 and then 2027?


Reply
(@AeroB13a)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 3849

Forget the Residence if travelling as a couple. All those I have spoken to who have tried the suits agree that 3&4 A, or, 3&4 K, are the best.


Reply