Review: British Air...
 

Review: British Airways Comair Business Class 737

19 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
252 Views
Posts: 40002
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#9902]
wpf-cross-image

After an unforgettable six days on safari, it was time to visit Cape Town for a few days. We had to fly Federal Air from Kruger National Park to Johannesburg (which I’ve already reviewed). From there we flew Comair from Johannesburg to Cape Town.

Continue reading: Review: British Airways Comair Business Class 737

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


18 Replies
18 Replies
Diamond
(@vt-cie)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 297

Love the fact that you wrote the plane registration (ZS-ZWR), Lucky! Why don’t you do it for your other trip reports?


Reply
 Paul
(@Paul)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

According to their own website, comair is a franchisee, not a subsidiary.


Reply
Diamond
(@aaron-3)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I get that it was a short flight, but I'm surprised nobody ended up sitting in seat 2D...


Reply
(@Junse)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 14

Actually only a few south African airways planes have the 2-3 configurations in business class, when I lived in lusaka, I fly south African airways quiet often on their 320s and 319s, and both have been retrofitted with new business class seats in a 2-2 configuration and is quiet elegant looking and comfortable.


Reply
(@mnrderasmus)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Typical service on Comair. The same on their 4hr flight to Mauritius. Nothing magical. Just going through the motions of what they have to do.


Reply
 Jake
(@jake-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Notice how under “737-800” on the safety card it says “737-8” instead of 737-max8...


Reply
(@Segun)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 8

Older Comair planes (like you were on) have the classic 737 interior and Club class seats in a 2-3 configuration. The newer ones have the Sky Interior and Club class in a 2-2 configuration.


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2608

@Jake - That's because the plane isn't a MAX, it's an 800.

I always take BA over SAA on every route where they overlap. SAA is consistently bad, while BA (Comair) is usually pretty good, despite your indifferent crew on your flight.

My travel agent in Cape Town no longer even quotes me SAA prices when booking flights for me; as she understand that SAA isn't even a consideration for me anymore. SAA is really that bad.


Reply
Diamond
(@phillip)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 312

ZS-ZWR is actually 20.5 years old. Originally delivered to Air Europa in 1999 it was then taken over by Kulula in 2011. 2014 was when it was registered with Comair. So a pretty old frame (not that it excuses the graffiti)! Also, it wasn’t long ago that BA operated a sub fleet of 737s out of Gatwick having had them in their fleet for many years! So a pretty common sight I would say!


Reply
(@The Jetset Boyz)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 30

@Paul

It’s an IAG subsidiary - they own 11.5% of Comair Limited.


Reply
 JB
(@JB)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 842

@Lucky - If you've been to TPA recently, you might have seen an ex-BA 737 parked over there. I heard it's currently being converted. Is that plane apart of Comair or one of BA's ex 737s based in Gatwick?


Reply
(@Alex Fortune)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 3

I always think the markings on the tail and winglets look a bit out compared to the rest of BA. I assume they have some pretty hefty brand guidelines so they’re probably right but still!


Reply
(@journeying john)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 41

What a contrast with BA's overpriced, degraded, cramped, under-catered European short/mid-haul


Reply
(@schar)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 886

@TravelinWilly why is it so bad?


Reply
(@Stephen)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

Have to say flown a few times , your right planes are getting tired . I flew down to CPT few weeks ago on the 737-800, whilst a newer plane they have now adopted the leaning middle seat free and offering a standard seat leg room . SLOW lounge is fab and have to say crew have always been great , attentive , offering drinks etc


Reply
(@Chris)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 47

I live in Cape Town but commute to Johannesburg for work. I refuse to fly on Comair and their low cost subsidiary kulula.com. Comair planes are ancient and generally in poor condition. They even use the 737-400 which in my opinion shouldn’t be used for passenger flights anymore. Their flights are almost always delayed, service is usually indifferent at best and the catering is poor. The worst two airlines in SA, in my humble opinion.


Reply
(@joe4007)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 13

SAA actually has a pretty decent J product on some of their narrow-bodies. Much better than what's offered in the US.


Reply
(@James Proctor)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 2

Just got back to UKfrom a South Africa trip and got to fly both SAA and Comair domestically within South Africa. Comair thoroughly disappointing, the 737-800 felt ancient and very tired inside, and the crew were the same as described in this review, curt and surly with barely a smile. SAA much better cabin configuration, better looked after aircraft and very friendly crew.


Reply