American Airlines M...
 

American Airlines Mechanic Gets 37 Month Prison Sentence

20 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
339 Views
Posts: 40405
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#10617]
wpf-cross-image

An American Airlines mechanic has just been sentenced to 37 months in prison for attempting to sabotage a plane. In September 2019, an American Airlines mechanic in Miami was charged with “willfully damaging, destroying or disabling an aircraft.” The 60 year old mechanic, Abdul-Majeed Marouf Ahmed Alani, had been at American Airlines for over 30…

Continue reading: American Airlines Mechanic Gets 37 Month Prison Sentence

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


19 Replies
19 Replies
 Gene
Diamond
(@gene-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ Ben -- Wow, what a shame. He should have been a politician instead.


Reply
(@Former UA1K)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 43

I think the judge made a typo- it should be "years" instead of months.


Reply
 NDV
(@NDV)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 15

"In fairness..." Really? A poor choice of words that probably unintentionally attempts to explain away pure recklessness and disregard for passenger safety. As a mechanic, he knew or should have known that what he was doing was incredibly wrong (no excuse) and possibly dangerous and could cause serious harm to those on board. I'm glad the courts didn't render the sentence thinking: 'well, at least it wasn't a brake line.' :-/


Reply
(@Chris)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

“In fairness” ??!!!

There is no justification for what he did and he should go to prison. Why do you offer an excuse for him?


Reply
(@Donald)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

This is a poor choice of words...
"In fairness, American Airlines had huge issues with their mechanics last summer, causing a countless number of cancelations and delays. "

There's no justification for this jerks actions. This could have caused a chain reaction of events, that could've led to more serious issues.


Reply
 Sam
(@sam-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 57

I normally don't nitpick words, but I do agree that saying "in fairness" in this context presents a false dichotomy here. Kind of like that politician who said there were “very fine people on both sides.”


Reply
 ktc
(@ktc)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 51

“In fairness”

the attitude these days is to not judge anyone for anything, even if its morally or criminally wrong. the Z gen had the utmost respect for being politically correct.


Reply
(@donna)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1580

Thirty-seven months is a slap on the wrist. It should have been 20 years. I hope this loser never works for an airline again.


Reply
Diamond
(@d3kingg)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The plane was never going to take off. Just have a mechanical delay. A reasonable sentence. If you read the article he’s put up with American for over 30 years.


Reply
(@Mario Sanchez)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 7

Amazing that this isn't being covered by the MSM. Hmm... I wonder why....


Reply
(@ithrowpoop)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

No matter what issues you have at your job, you can never justify endangering passenger lives due to a spat with your employer. I've work at a hospital for over 15 years, would it be "in fairness" if I sabotaged someone's medicine or treatment because I had disagreements about my benefits with the hospital?


Reply
Gold
(@notbad41)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 54

In fairness to Lucky...He was just reporting.


Reply
 Luis
Diamond
(@luis)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 388

I don't know much about airplane mechanics, but was there a chance that this plane would have taken off with the tampered nav system? I'm guessing not, and the mechanic probably knew this. So I don't think any passengers were in potential danger.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 410

"In fairness, American Airlines.." how sweet.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 410

" So I don’t think any passengers were in potential danger." Easy to say when you or a loved when were not on the flight. Why is it so hard for some of you to condemn this act?


Reply
(@adam123)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 0

37 months is a ridiculously light sentence. Hundreds of people could have died because of this mechanic’s greed. Luckily the pilots caught the damage, but what if they didn’t? This could have turned into a horrible tragedy.


Reply
(@WestCoastGuy)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 28

Some of the comments above are ridiculous. He's been a mechanic for over 30 years so he clearly knows what he's doing. If he really meant to cause harm to passengers, why would he tamper with the plane in such a way that it was so easily discoverable by the pilots?


Reply
Gold
(@donato)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@WEST COAST GUY
Airline travel is safe based on redundancies built in to the system. nevertheless, removing a major support is criminal. You never know what pressures a flight crew is under and either does not notice or accepts to fly with a defect.
The behavior was grossly criminal and might even be considered terrorism.


Reply
(@Mr. Obvious)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 68

In fairness - Boeing's MCAS on their 737-Max was tested and approved by FAA - therefore they have absolutely no culpability to the two disasters that took place on those planes...

Horrible choice of words here, I think this article should be amended because it sounds like you are on the side of this "poor" mechanic who wasn't getting his $40/hr overtime.

And shame on any of you that think this maintenance guy should get off light because he "knew" what he was doing wouldn't cause a disaster. Now THAT is ridiculous.


Reply