Alaska Flight Atten...
 

Alaska Flight Attendant Power Trip: "Clash Of Personalities" Causes Family Removal From Flight

74 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
746 Views
Posts: 40050
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#19674]
wpf-cross-image

Yesterday I covered a bizarre story about a family being denied boarding on an Alaska Airlines flight, because the carrier’s system had the wrong visa requirements (which is embarrassing, but let’s ignore that for a moment). Then after being downgraded on the next flight, they ended up being removed at the request of the flight…

Continue reading: Alaska Flight Attendant Power Trip: “Clash Of Personalities” Causes Family Removal From Flight

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


73 Replies
73 Replies
 Matt
(@Matt)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 30

This is the predictable endpoint of a system that lionizes flight attendants as safety warriors, and absolves them of needing to perform virtually any service or hospitality functions.


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

Matt ... Exactly so .


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

This is exactly why it is better to take a Jeep from Montana to Canada , thus avoiding Alaska .


Reply
Diamond
(@justinb-2)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 389

I can all but guarantee your 3 year old is better behaved in public than this FA


Reply
 JL
(@JL)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 70

Agreed 200%, very well said


Reply
Gold
(@dendave)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 120

So...who won the Nutella standoff?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40050

@ DENDAVE -- Please don't ask. 🙁 We did come to a compromise, but he definitely got the better deal.


Reply
 Jay
(@Jay)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 115

HA! I guess we have our answer. Maybe next time, Ben 😉


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Wow, incidents like these are thankfully rare, but, if this is what happened, it exposes Alaska, big-time. It proves the front-line crew knew there was zero safety threat under 49 U.S.C. § 44902. They weaponized "crew discretion" because a premium passenger dared to ask for names after an employee tried to inappropriately "reserve" an entire row.

Airlines rely entirely on your confusion and emotional exhaustion to screw you over in these moments. If you find yourself facing a corporate power trip, please consider:

1) Remain calm: Treat the interaction like a camera is rolling. Composure strips them of their only legal cover, retroactively labeling you a "safety threat."

2) Do not accept a quick refund: Accepting a pro-rata refund on the spot legally severs the contract and absolves them of whatever you have to spend to get to your destination.

3) Demand an Involuntary Reroute: Force a supervisor to look at interline partners or competitors to get you to your destination on their dime. If they refuse, document the refusal.

4) Document "Under Protest": Get names (clearly this family tried to do that!), write down timelines, and text/email the airline before you buy a competitor's ticket stating you are doing so under protest because they failed to perform.

5) Sue for Breach of Contract: Bypass regular customer service. File a DOT complaint to pull the internal logs, and head straight to Small Claims Court for full reimbursement of your consequential damages (the competitor's tickets and incidentals).

Many times, airlines do make it right at Step 3. But if they don’t, and you have to go to war, walk away. Ditch your points, burn your credits, and forget about brand loyalty. Treat modern air travel like the strict commodity it has become, in the US at least.

Friends, you know that I wish the US had actual robust consumer protections like in the UK, EU, and Canada, but even those have loopholes, like the AirHelp v. Austrian Airlines decision that strips transit passengers of EU261 protection if they start and end outside Europe (like, JFK-CDG-BKK on Air France). Until our laws catch up, your best weapon against an ego trip is a cool head and paper trail. You'll be late, but you won't lose more money than you need to. Keep fighting!


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

"hippopotamize" , rather than "lionize" .


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Ben, any update on reimbursement, compensation for this family? Like, "a good talking to" isn't enough, here. They deserve a full-recovery.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Fellas, this is an outlier; you folks typically bash the workers, but most crews are professionals. Clearly, not here, sadly.


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

-OR- Simply read the name tag ? Duh .

The long list of things to do , and laws to be invoked , are a waste of effort and time .


Reply
 Jay
(@Jay)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 115

Like you said, I’ve got tons of respect for FAs. But sometimes, it does feel like some of them are actively miserable and treat all customers as an inconvenience.

I’m glad you’re writing more about this and providing an update. Alaska (or most airlines really) won’t care until it goes public and their reputation is at stake.


Reply
(@Levine)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 2

When you have too many outliers, they are no longer outliers. U.S. flight attendants are notorious for their power trips and reluctance to work. No wonder why they sometimes barricade the galleys in order not to be bothered. You notice a subtantial positive difference in the attitude of flight attendants when you take an Eastern European, Middle Eastern or Asian carrier.


Reply
(@George Romey)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1401

The airlines are afraid to go agains the unions, which protect and serve flight attendants that think the job of the flight attendant is to sit in a jump seat and complain about crew scheduling, crew hotels and not making enough money.

While they are in the minority they are found in all US based airlines.


Reply
(@isaac)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 128

How do we "know" this was the real FO....and not another commenter saying they were.

Remember, just because they claim doesnt mean they are until verified.....this whole situation doesnt make much sense here and i think this is on the realm of fake outrage to amplify thier greivance.


Reply
Diamond
(@mantis)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 186

One word: unions


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2614

“… because your personalities don’t necessarily jive.”

Sorry to be that guy but here I go being that guy.

“Jive” is a form of speech or language, or a dance.

“Jibe” is to match up or agree.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! 🙂


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2614

You forgot to mention “girl food.” What about girl food?


Reply
 Matt
(@Matt)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 30

Ironic, give how profoundly white Lucky is.


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

TravelinWill ... the story indicates that the FA doesn't "jive" at all . "Jazzy Jive" is my preference .


Reply
(@George)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 59

Completely expected that U.S. flight attendants misbehave like this when corporations allow them to get away with anything. Time for them to become at-will employees that can be fired when they generate customer complaints.

Shame on Alaska Air and Ben Minicucci!


Reply
(@Eliyahu)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 95

100%. Just pour the soda.


Reply
(@Steve)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 19

Small silver lining... If that internet person really was the FO on their next flight, it reminds me of how Alaska staff actually *can* sometimes do little things to help customers. For the FO to know, presumably an airport agent at the outstation made a note or told them in some way, and the sympathy was interpreted by the FO as requiring some level of service recovery.


Reply
(@The Other Nick)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 14

@Ben, you keep your government hands off of Miles' Nutella! 😉


Reply
(@DCAWABN)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 250

Some flight attendants really need to be reined in

No, some flight attendants need to be FIRED. FTFY.


Reply
(@George)
Joined: 3 months ago

Posts: 1

The Alaska flight attendant should be fired, plain and simple. This was handled in an unacceptable fashion and there is ZERO excuse for this. Alaska should e-mail this family, offer a full apology with no excuses (with the very simple explanation that the flight attendant did not follow Alaska procedures) and a nice healthy credit towards a future Alaska flight. Sometimes the best course of action is a flat out apologize and try to make up for a complete customer service failure.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

One word: No.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

This isn’t a union-issue; to borrow from your typical defense of authority figures, it’s just one bad apple… most crews are professional.


Reply
(@DCAWABN)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 250

I always laugh at "The FAs are here primarily for your safety" when easily half of them are to large to fit down the aisles without turning sideways and/or are so old that in the event of an emergency, they are likely to be a detriment to safety and will need to be "saved" themselves.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Alert, so, just ‘take it.’ Let ‘em hurt ya. Huh. No, that ain’t good enough for me. And no one should settle for that. C’mon.


Reply
(@espresso_frankfurt)
Joined: 5 months ago

Member
Posts: 66

This is really bad. Alaska should send out some huge vouchers to these people to use on their oneworld partners.


Reply
Diamond
(@uncleronnie)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 1235

Yup. It only takes one FA from each US airline to get the boot, the union to stand with the airline (for once) and all the others will fall in line.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

DCAWABN, just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't real, kind of like 'germ theory.' Flight attendants aren't there to sprint down the aisle; they are trained to manage crowd control, operate exit doors, and execute evacuation protocols under extreme stress. Physical size doesn't dictate authority or competence in a crisis. That said, the FA in this AS instance is likely in the wrong.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Eliyahu, on your next flight, please do tell your crew exactly how you feel... ideally, before they pour you your soda. Drink up!


Reply
(@Mike Smith)
Joined: 10 months ago

Posts: 3

A non-trivial number of airline "incidents" are triggered by flight attendants. I believe they have been given too much power to be judge and jury.

C-PAP's (breathing devices for those with sleep apnea) are allowed by the FAA on every airline. That (at the time) was listed in the back of every airlines' inflight magazine. It does +not+ count against the carryon limit.

I was on an AA flight and a FA got upset because I brought it on board. I showed her the rule printed in the magazine and she backed down. I also reported it to AA.

Received an apology letter on AA stationery and it suggested I carry the letter on board in case it happened again (I guess training its people properly was out of the question). Sure enough, a couple of weeks later, an AA FA exploded when she saw the C-PAP. When I showed her the letter, she said it was a FORGERY! She was shouting and another FA had to calm her down and tell her what I was doing was okay.

Finally, more recently, flew on AA overnight back from Hawaii. I was using the C-PAP and it was plugged in like any other device. I was awakened -- twice -- by different FA's telling me I couldn't use it. I pulled out the dog-eared letter (it was many years old at this point).

In every one of these cases, they had determined I was wrong, rather than simply inquiring. I've seen this happening on other airlines over other issues.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Levine, apples and oranges. Carriers in the Middle East and Asia are heavily subsidized, they do not have labor protections, and there is rampant ageism and sexism. As far as your 'barricade' concern... umm, you are aware this often happens so the pilot can use the lav? Guys, can we please focus on the one-off bad-actor here, instead of vilifying an entire group?


Reply
(@HaroldW)
Joined: 7 months ago

Posts: 19

"What do you make of this situation, based on these reports?"

I choose not to speculate on situations that are none of my concern based on third-part comments from online sites even if it appears that those comments come from people who witnessed the situation.

Nothing toward a greater good is gained from doing so.


Reply
(@guldennl)
Joined: 1 year ago

Member
Posts: 0

Then why are they still employed?
Why don't we change that FA for four first class tickets?


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

GuldenNL, didn't this incident just happen? I mean, efficiency sounds great, but they'll probably do their own internal investigation on their agent(s). Naw, naw... fire 'em out of a canon! *boom*


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Alert, well, aren't you the Rhymenoceros....


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

I don't understand the "visa requirement" mention at the beginning . So , they fly from Montana to Alaska ? What is the visa requirement ?


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

Are they are citizens of Switzerland ? Do they live in USA ? What visa requirement ? They cannot go to Alaska ?


Reply
(@Yen4Travel)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 50

I was Gold 100k since the the tier was established and have Titanium Status through the end of 2027. I have flown into Canada on Alaska a few times and the Alaska system doesn't handle it very well. I have valid U.S. Passport and Nexus card.

Something has really gone awry with Alaska in general. The Hawaiian merger, developing international routes, and revising the mileage program seems to be a juggling act they can't handle.

Telling passengers to deboard a plane for the request made by the make flyer to me should be grounds for disciplinary action. A flight attendant who escalates to this level so quickly needs additional training and/or consequences.


Reply
 CAPO
(@CAPO)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 33

And if you can’t get enough americans to do that job bring immigrants like other carriers do. American flight attendants have become too entitled and need some free market lessons.


Reply
Gold
(@natea)
Joined: 4 months ago

Member
Posts: 0

What a horrible situation! I hope Christophe and family get some kind of apology from Alaska.

Also, Lucky, just truly came to say that I am STRUGGLING to not laugh out loud during a virtual meeting after reading "But the thing is, he’s three years old. Presumably this flight attendant has a few years on him, even if she’s acting similarly." Ha!!!


Reply
(@goheelz)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 21

Yep. FAs should be paid for the service quality they provide


Reply
(@Steve)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 115

Again, will you be following up with Alaska to obtain its side of the story as well as what Alaska plans to do to compensate this family? Balanced journalism, you know?


Reply
(@AeroB13a)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 3843

My Oh, my. A Walter free post, this must be a first.


Reply
Diamond
(@digital_notmad)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 593

while the "union" theory seems reasonable enough to explain FA behavior in the US, i don't think it really survives contact with DL FAs


Reply
 Jr
(@Jr)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 218

Always nice to get one side of the story and then make your decision.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Always nice to see corporate shills inserting plausible deniability to harm consumers. Not.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Bashing unions, or all workers, after an incident like this, is prejudicial and deflects responsibility away from the specific individuals who act inappropriately, as seemingly here. Wish we could focus on the bad actor(s), and not blame entire groups. *sigh*


Reply
(@bayareatravlr)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The silence from AS so far on this has been interesting. This story has developed legs and gone beyond the 24 hour news cycle. AS is usually out by now with some kind of spin, but perhaps the objective facts in this case are so inexcusably awful that even their crisis communications consultants are out of ideas.


Reply
(@Aetane)
Joined: 1 year ago

Posts: 33

Covered in detail in the previous article which this one practically begs you to read first...

Yikes, people


Reply
(@fllflyer)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 29

While the F/A was clearly in the wrong and that needs to be addressed, either with a suspension or possible termination.
The non-rev demanding the entire row for herself is just ridiculous. Non-revs know better than to do this, especially if customers with assigned seats show up. The NRSA pax needs to have pass travel suspended for a significant period, nothing short of two years.


Reply
(@BjornFree)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 70

Airlines need to do a better job at screening out insufferable fascist flight attendants.


Reply
Gold
(@kawada)
Joined: 1 year ago

Member
Posts: 0

This is a travel blog, not CNN. And Alaska Airlines has its own avenues of communication if it wishes to weigh in. But also, I have to chuckle at the notion that there can be "balance" between some average Joe and a multibillion dollar corporation. "This is unfair to the corporation, what's their side of the story??" All these big bad average Joes and travel bloggers picking on the sad defenseless little airline.


Reply
(@Crosscourt)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 423

Why do we constantly hear of this behaviour by cabin crew in north America and specifically in the US? It happens there more, by a massive majority, than anywhere else.


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6206

IT'S OFFICIAL

@1990 is the Tim Dunn of unions.


Reply
(@Ehud Gavron)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 77

There are 56 comments before mine, and having read all of them --after all if I can't be bothered to read what others think and write why should anyone read what I write-- I have some input. Fortunately I was not on that flight nor on any other flight. My comments are my opinion.

Ever since "Nine-Eleven" the magic words are either those in quotes or "Security." Even my bank won't talk to me without a Sir, Message, Sir: "Sir, for your security I need your social security number, Sir." For my security I don't give that out.

Our quickly-created DHS and its parts including TSA (and CBP and ICE) are only too happy to use these excuses to perpetuate the entirely useless "security theater." In this case an entire family was IDBd, deplaned, downgraded, and generally treated like shit. I wish I could say it's this administration but [while this one is the worst since 2001] this has been going on since the inception of the three-letter agencies of nazis, hooligans, egomaniacs, and power trippers.

FAs have always lusted after power and now they get to deplane whomever they [don't] like. There is no recourse. The customer has been paid to get fucked and the customer does get fucked and if the customer doesn't smile and say thank you, that's ALL they get... no flight... no refund... nothing but lies.

This isn't an Alaska Problem nor an FA problem but more of a systemic problem where the magic words (in quotes above) trump any reason or common sense. It has never been acceptable, but in today's United States the culture is out of control.

Time to ask: "What security are you talking about?" "How is my family endangering that security?" "Your attitude today suggests YOU get your bag and be replaced before this aircraft leaves. The captain will back me up." (and the Captain should... because sometimes the customer IS right and the employee attitude needs adjustment.)

I've managed teams between 2-5 and 200-500 and it's a tough decision but if you can't make that decision, you're ineligible to fly Part-121 pax because you won't do the hard part of the job.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

Healthy skepticism is good, Ehud. Reforms are sorely needed. May not agree on everything, but I appreciate that you take the time to read and share on here (and elsewhere. Thank you.


Reply
 1990
(@1990)
Joined: 11 months ago

Posts: 4889

I tend to advocate for worker and consumer protections; that’s quite different than shilling for one preferred corporation (and, you gotta admire Tim’s passion and dedication). If you don’t see the difference, that’s more on you.


Reply
Diamond
(@watson)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 503

AS is welcome to dispute any part of this.


Reply
(@reiko)
Joined: 3 months ago

Posts: 1

What's the rest of that saying though?


Reply
(@Alert)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 684

Fifth paragraph : "trump any reason or common sense" ? Please don't make this political . Trump had nothing to do with this .


Reply
(@Trump is a verb)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 2

You can't be serious...


Reply
(@Julia)
Joined: 1 year ago

Posts: 88

1990 is Tim Dunn, on another computer.


Reply
 pat
(@pat)
Joined: 2 months ago

Posts: 1

boycott those companies that don't appreciate good customers ...very simple you have the power use it


Reply
Diamond
(@lieflat19)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 301

Many flight attendants in the US think they are God's gift to the world and can do whatever they want. They treat people like crap, don't do anything on the flight other than the absolute bare minimum, and then constantly complain they aren't paid enough!


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 2 months ago

Posts: 1

Well, the FA needs to be put back into training mode. Had I been there, I would have loudly told the FA, the pax was in the right.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 2 months ago

Posts: 1

For FA in general....THEY FAIL. Gwad, i am so tired of American FAs all of them. Qatar Airways. Singapore Air, Philippines Air sooooo much better looking and performance.


Reply