Finally: Boeing Fires CEO Of Commercial Airplanes

Boeing has had a really rough year with the grounding of the 737 MAX globally following two fatal crashes. That was bad enough, but all the scandals that have emerged following this have left a lot of us in shock regarding the culture of what was once a very respected company.

One surprising thing has been the lack of senior management changes in the past several months. Well, it looks like that’s finally happening.

It has today been announced that Kevin McAllister is stepping down from his role as President and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes. He’s being replaced by Stan Deal effective immediately. Deal joined Boeing in 1986, and was previously President and CEO of Boeing Global Services.

This decision comes just a day after Boeing’s board had a meeting.

Boeing President and CEO Dennis Muilenburg said the following:

“Our entire Boeing team is focused on operational excellence, aligned with our values of safety, quality and integrity, and we’re committed to delivering on our commitments and regaining trust with our regulators, customers and other stakeholders.

Stan brings extensive operational experience at Commercial Airplanes and trusted relationships with our airline customers and industry partners; and Ted brings to our Global Services business an enterprise approach to customers and strong digital business expertise — a key component of our long-term growth plans.”

McAllister had the following to say regarding this departure from the company:

“Boeing is a great company with a commitment to safety I have seen firsthand working side-by-side with many thousands of tremendously talented and dedicated employees. It has been an honor to serve with such a professional team for the past three years.”

Bottom Line

I’ve been amazed by how few senior executives at Boeing have been fired up until this point. On some level it’s not even about whether they’re directly at fault for this mess (even though there are a lot of questions about Boeing’s corporate culture at this point), but rather about the amount of public trust that has been lost in the company, which seems almost irreparable at this point.

We’ve seen the 737 MAX issue only get worse and worse, and it’s clear some serious leadership changes are needed. Frankly I’m surprised Muilenburg is still in his role (update: he ended up being fired a couple of months later).

Are you surprised by how few senior management changes we’ve seen at Boeing?

Conversations (64)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

BillC Gold

@The nice Paul -- here is an example of what I mean by Middle Management "bureaucrats" damaging/ruining a corporation's product: www.zdnet.com/article/why-is-windows-10-a-mess-ex-microsoft-engineer-blames-the-culture-of-made-men When Microsoft got a new CEO in Nadella, he apparently retained the old legacy "bureaucrats" within the Windows business unit ... and look at the results of that messed up decision! Should Nadella now need to get replaced, or should he start (albeit late) to clean house within the Windows business unit?

0
‼ 0
BillC Gold

@The nice Paul -- "... your dog-like devotion to them makes you look a bit odd! ... I am not arguing for scapegoating – merely that those people who are responsible, no matter their level, should actually man-up and take responsibility." -- I don't know what part of my posts exhibit any "dog-like devotion," since I *did* say that those in Upper Management, who have been *proven* to be directly culpable through Due Process, should suffer at least the same punishments as culpable Middle Management personnel in the Business Unit that the top-level CEO oversees! From what you just posted, what you espouse is *Not* that different from what I also espouse? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @ -- "is it just Boeing that you defend to your dying breath, or are other corporations also paragons of virtue who can do no wrong?!" -- So I'm giving *my* perspectives based upon my decades of experience in the High Tech industries, both from within Engineering as well as Executive Management ... my attitudes about such issues remain the same *regardless* of whether it's Boeing or any other companies in similar situations! I notice that you're *still* misinterpreting what I had repeated posted about Upper Management being held to account, should evidences warrant such actions through Due Process! I still do *Not* see where you got the impression about my purportedly claiming that corporations are *always* held to be faultless!

0
‼ 0
Ron Guest

For me the issue with Muilenberg is not his involvement with the 737 disaster as likely the drama already started before him being CEO. My issue with him is the total lack willingness to take the problem heads on. Instead all we have seen is denial, finger pointing, PR noise, witholding information etc etc. Even this morning I saw a note from Boeing that their bugs will be flying soon. What he should have done as CEO is take full responsibility and fully cooperate with the investigations. And certainly not pooping out press releases like rabbits are pooping out pellets. So he got his priorities totally wrong.

0
‼ 0
The nice Paul Diamond

@ BillC I so hope you're getting paid a vast salary by Boeing, because otherwise your dog-like devotion to them makes you look a bit odd! If you had read my posts carefully, you would see I am not arguing for scapegoating - merely that those people who are responsible, no matter their level, should actually man-up and take responsibility. Surely that is reasonable, given the multi-million dollar packages they've snorted up during the good times? So now I'm curious: is it just Boeing that you defend to your dying breath, or are other corporations also paragons of virtue who can do no wrong?!

0
‼ 0
James Richenbocker Guest

Runaway electric trim should never cause a crash... The pilots of the 2nd crash made rookie mistakes and the first crash pilots were not much better. That said Boeing made so many mistakes with MCAS including not installing a dumbed down warning system that the is plenty of blame to go around. Now fit and finish issues, delays, to 777x and 797 prototype and you must wonder what the hell is going on there.....

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published