A perfect example of why direct flights suck….

Last night I was booked on UA931, the 6:59PM flight from San Francisco to Los Angeles. Unfortunately the flight was substantially delayed, so I decided to do some investigating. I tracked where the plane was coming from, and as it turns out it was UA926 coming from Los Angeles, and it was delayed due to a mechanical. What makes this interesting is that UA926 is the same flight number that continues to Frankfurt. The airlines love to market “direct” flights which really have stopovers, in this case “fly direct from Los Angeles to Frankfurt.” I’d bet several people aboard the Los Angeles to San Francisco flight were connecting to Frankfurt, and many probably had no clue that there was a plane change until check-in.

Take a look at this picture:

phpmrsijfpm

See that 777 in the background? Looks like any other 777, right? Nah, that’s the 777 going to Frankfurt, while the same flight from Los Angeles hasn’t even arrived. Heck, they missed each other by over an hour.

All US legacies do this. It’s a deceiving practice and it needs to STOP.

Conversations (8)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Jeff Doucette New Member

AC is marketing "direct" from YVR to CDG which sounds like a sweet deal given the latitude and polar circle flying. Should save a ton of time vs. connecting through YYZ or YUL right? Wrong. The flight connects through YUL likely resulting in a 3-4 hour flying time increase vs. the YVR-LHR or YVR-FRA offered by AC or LH. Given good LH connections at FRA you could be inside CDG sooner by connecting on LH vs. taking the YVR-CDG "direct".

0
‼ 0
SAN Greg Guest

United does this with a flight from San Diego to Frankfurt, also. Last year my wife (who is 1P) attempted to use miles for an upgrade. The SAN-SFO segment cleared, but the SFO-FRA segment didn't. United will dock 30k miles unless you notify them - and even then they will charge you 15k for the domestic upgrade - which most of us would agree is not an efficient use of miles! After complaining, UA credited all the miles back, and my wife continued her loyalty to them. I agree with you - this practice only works to erode an airline's credibility.

0
‼ 0
ua_to_ord Guest

At least flights marketed as direct allow passengers to eschew some airport taxes. :)

0
‼ 0
Sam Guest

I did a SFO-LAX flight on that daye and everything wen perfectly, damn it, everytime i do a MR everything goes smothly, every time i do a real trip, everything get delayed!

0
‼ 0
John Guest

How could you not have known the difference between direct and nonstop?

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published