American “Rejects” Merger With United, But Drops Interesting Hint Of Its Own

American “Rejects” Merger With United, But Drops Interesting Hint Of Its Own

22

Is it just me, or is this a very strange several weeks for the airline industry? I never thought I’d write the first part of the above headline, because the concept is just so outlandish.

American says United merger would be bad for consumers

Several days ago, it was reported that in late February 2026, United CEO Scott Kirby approached the Trump administration about the concept of a merger with American. Kirby reportedly tried to argue that a combined airline would be a stronger competitor internationally (which I think is a really bad take, given the way joint ventures are structured, but I digress).

Such a deal would combine the world’s two largest airlines, so under normal circumstances, you’d assume there’s almost no chance of something like this getting regulatory approval. Trump is a quirky guy, though, so… who knows. It’s suggested that the White House was skeptical of such a concept, especially at a time when affordability is such an issue, ahead of the midterms.

There’s now an update, as American has gone on record as saying that it’s not interested in a merger with United, claiming it would be bad for consumers, and that it’s not consistent with the company’s understanding of the Trump administration’s approach to antirust enforcement. Specifically, here’s the statement:

We appreciate the leadership and strong support of President Trump, Secretary Duffy and numerous other leaders in the Administration who have demonstrated expertise and an ongoing commitment to continue to improve the world’s best aviation industry.

American Airlines is not engaged with or interested in any discussions regarding a merger with United Airlines. While changes in the broader airline marketplace may be necessary, a combination with United would be negative for competition and for consumers, and therefore inconsistent with our understanding of the Administration’s philosophy toward the industry and principles of antitrust law. Our focus will remain on executing on our strategic objectives and positioning American to win for the long term.

We look forward to continuing to work collaboratively with the Administration as it takes steps to strengthen the broader airline industry.

American isn’t interested in a merger with United

My take on American “rejecting” United’s merger intest

I don’t think most reasonable people were expecting that a United and American merger would get regulatory approval, even under Trump. I do think American publicly stating that this is bad for consumers further closes the door on any possibility of this.

I still can’t help but be curious what was going on in Kirby’s head. He’s a smart guy, so did he just have a moment of delusion, or was he just trying to feel out Trump, to see what he’d actually be open to? Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure Kirby would love for it to happen, but it just seems highly unrealistic.

I tend to think Kirby has three primary things that conceptually motivate him:

  • Catching up with Delta financially
  • Taking revenge on and trash talking American, his former employer
  • Returning to JFK in a meaningful way

I can’t imagine that Kirby actually thought such a deal would get approval, though I suspect he took the approach of “you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.” For that matter, suggesting an American merger and then “settling” for a JetBlue merger makes that seem much more reasonable, by comparison.

However, I also think American’s statement is worth taking note of. The airline didn’t need to make any statement about this, and it could’ve also just said that it believes a combination with United would be negative for competition and for consumers.

But the airline went on to mention how “changes in the broader airline marketplace may be necessary,” and that the carrier’s focus will remain executing on its “strategic objectives and positioning American to win for the long term.”

That’s… an interesting statement for American to volunteer. American is clearly signaling that it thinks there will be consolidation, and seems to be hinting at the possibility of it engaging in some consolidation of its own.

I think it’s going to be a very interesting several weeks. While JetBlue has a debt issue, I continue to think that we could ultimately see both American and United compete to buy JetBlue. United definitely doesn’t want American buying JetBlue, and American definitely doesn’t want United buying JetBlue (admittedly United is in a better financial situation, so…).

Could American be interested in a merger of its own?

Bottom line

We recently learned that United CEO Scott Kirby approached the Trump administration about the concept of a merger with American. American has now responded by saying that it’s not interested in a merger with United, that it would be bad for consumers, and that the airline doesn’t think such a deal would get regulatory approval.

However, airlines are very deliberate when they issue statements on topics like this, and I can’t help but take note of the mention of how “changes in the broader airline marketplace may be necessary,” and how the airline will focus on its “strategic objectives and positioning American to win for the long term.” Is American hinting at some possible consolidation interest of its own, or…?

What do you make of American’s “rejection” of United?

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Northern Flyer Guest

    Why not merge all airlines while you’re at it, and have a national carrier? It’s been done before. You could call it Aeroflot perhaps.

  2. Gva Guest

    AA should bid for B6 regardless. Either they win B6 or UA overpays.

  3. Goforride Gold

    The only question is for the American Airline's stockholders. Will they be better off 5 years from now continuing to hold AA stock?

    Or will they be better off having swapped their AA stock for UA stock in 2026.

    That's the only question that matters and the opinions of the stockholders are the only ones that matter.

  4. Tp Guest

    I’m confused …, why would delta go through so many mergers in the past , only to become stagnant and number three in size - it’s an airline that loves mergers and control - I’m thinking one more merger for delta , and the airline would become unionized in every work group , which is something it doesn’t want … hence , no more mergers for delta ( except for A merger with Alaskan (poor...

    I’m confused …, why would delta go through so many mergers in the past , only to become stagnant and number three in size - it’s an airline that loves mergers and control - I’m thinking one more merger for delta , and the airline would become unionized in every work group , which is something it doesn’t want … hence , no more mergers for delta ( except for A merger with Alaskan (poor Alaskan) )
    United will grab jet blue before American does , … American will file bankruptcy once again down the road ( couldn’t happen to a nicer airline ( i’m being facetious) ) .
    Americans will continue to bail out all these airlines again with tax dollars when they get close to bellying up . It’s a big ol mess - but one thing for sure these airlines think they’re all that and a bag of chips !

  5. Dave the Fave Guest

    AA is such a trash airline that merging with United would drag United down tremendously. AA needs to concentrate on improving their service rather than merging or gobbling up some other airline. AA's best days are far behind them, and may never get back to being the great airline they once were. Haven't flown them in 25+ years after they 'stole' substantial mileage from me that was never to have expired (earned prior to their...

    AA is such a trash airline that merging with United would drag United down tremendously. AA needs to concentrate on improving their service rather than merging or gobbling up some other airline. AA's best days are far behind them, and may never get back to being the great airline they once were. Haven't flown them in 25+ years after they 'stole' substantial mileage from me that was never to have expired (earned prior to their change to miles expiring after after a certain period). They didn't care when I called them out on it, and I have found far better service from other airlines

    1. Littlebelly Guest

      What are you smoking? United is much worse than american. United lost my luggage and refuse to compensate. Their attendants are rude. Flew with them 3 timed between 2019 and 2025 and regret every time. Giving them a chance is no different than throwing money away.

  6. Darlene D Guest

    Scott Kirby is an immature jerk, taking revenge is so silly. I prefer flying AA much much more than UA, which I despise for being much less customer and nember friendly

  7. 1990 Guest

    Malarkey. Hoopla. Bull.

    Corporations and politicians really have become reality television and the travel blogs really have become some combination of The National Enquirer, TMZ, and BRAVO.

    1. 1990 Guest

      Next episode… will Tim Apple bring another golden idol… tune in to find out!

  8. rebel Diamond

    Ben says, "United definitely doesn’t want American buying JetBlue"

    Why not? Do you think the combined airline would have to divest JFK slots? Would it be laden with more debt? Would it have to deal with all the fun and distractions of a merger? Too funny.

    1. Plane Jane Guest

      are you this dumb working at UA investor relations, Rebel? UA doesn't want another competitor in NYC. AA buying B6 would create a true 3rd player in NYC.

      Newark is a dump and known for it. It's the only reason UA has to advertise to New Yorkers go to EWR... is that lost on you living in Chicago never going to NYC? lol
      Has it never occurred to you that AA and Delta...

      are you this dumb working at UA investor relations, Rebel? UA doesn't want another competitor in NYC. AA buying B6 would create a true 3rd player in NYC.

      Newark is a dump and known for it. It's the only reason UA has to advertise to New Yorkers go to EWR... is that lost on you living in Chicago never going to NYC? lol
      Has it never occurred to you that AA and Delta never have to market LGA and jFK to New Yorkers? There's a reason, Reb. Only UA needs to advertise a known airport to New Yorkers to make it seem more palatable. lol

      Go back to your IR Drivel. You contribute nothing except what you're told to say and don't even know what you're saying then.

    2. rebel Diamond

      And yet UA has the largest NYC market share without anything at JFK. Methinks thou doth protest way too much.

    3. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ rebel -- Regarding UA having the largest NYC market share without anything at JFK, I don't disagree with that, but my question is why Kirby is obsessed with having a meaningful presence at JFK then?

    4. Plane Jane Guest

      I think Ben already got ya here but your response did invite the obvious response:

      Your CEO is obsessed with JFK... for being the "largest" in NYC ;) It seems EWR is not enough per your own CEO. You should talk to him about your talking points.

      but.. given that United has to market the entire Newark airport to the island of Manhattan as though they don't know it exists to make it palatable, that's not surprising.

    5. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ rebel -- If American and JetBlue were to merge, I don't think they should have to divest JFK slots, since the combined NYC presence would really just level the playing field, and mean there are three real competitors in NYC.

      As far as "dealing with all the fun and distractions of a merger," American management doesn't seem to be focused even without distractions, so I can't really comment on that. No matter what, American needs new management, though.

    6. rebel Diamond

      Sure, all CEOs want all they can get or get away with towards gaining monopolistic pricing power, but at what price and for how long can they enjoy using it? What Kirby wants and needs are enough slots at JFK for transcons to SFO and LAX. The folks heading to the Hamptons from the coast aren't flying into EWR.

    7. Plane Jane Guest

      to be clear.
      You think Scott Kirby wants JFK slots to connect LA and SF to the Hamptons? lol.

      Let's both hope your own CEO is smarter than you about why he wants JFK access. It certainly is NOT the Hamptons lol but wow... Way to lower the IQ

      He wants JFK because your casual international flyer thinks of EWR what it is, a drive from Manhattan across a desolate wasteland of NJ (don't...

      to be clear.
      You think Scott Kirby wants JFK slots to connect LA and SF to the Hamptons? lol.

      Let's both hope your own CEO is smarter than you about why he wants JFK access. It certainly is NOT the Hamptons lol but wow... Way to lower the IQ

      He wants JFK because your casual international flyer thinks of EWR what it is, a drive from Manhattan across a desolate wasteland of NJ (don't pretend you haven't done that drive. There's nothing pretty on the way to EWR from Manhattan).
      JFK is why every United JV partner flies there despite the UA EWR hub.

      Look it up. LHR-JFK is a higher yield vs LHR-EWR.

    8. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ rebel -- I have to again agree with Plane Jane. You think the reason United wants JFK-LAX/SFO flights is specifically to serve West Coast to Hamptons demand? You think that justifies the service on a year-round basis, with several daily flights? I have a hard time making sense of that logic in any way.

    9. Plane Jane Guest

      "As far as "dealing with all the fun and distractions of a merger," American management doesn't seem to be focused even without distractions, so I can't really comment on that. No matter what, American needs new management, though."

      Also true.

    10. Goforride Guest

      United would be buying JetBlue's $9 billion debt and there's no reason for that.

  9. Rjb Guest

    Everybody wants JetBlue but nobody wants to assume $8+ billion in debt. JetBlue will be bankrupt in 6-12 months. They can fight it out over their assets. Split up JFK, United gets FLL.

    1. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ Rjb -- If JetBlue files for bankruptcy, it would almost certainly be Chapter 11 and not Chapter 7. Assets wouldn't be sold off, but the airline would reorganize, and likely keep its entire JFK portfolio. JetBlue isn't like Spirit, where it's just complete toast.

      I hear you that in an ideal world, airlines could get JetBlue's assets without assuming the debt, but I just don't see it going that way. Time is of the essence here, given regulatory approval concerns.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Northern Flyer Guest

Why not merge all airlines while you’re at it, and have a national carrier? It’s been done before. You could call it Aeroflot perhaps.

0
Gva Guest

AA should bid for B6 regardless. Either they win B6 or UA overpays.

0
Goforride Gold

The only question is for the American Airline's stockholders. Will they be better off 5 years from now continuing to hold AA stock? Or will they be better off having swapped their AA stock for UA stock in 2026. That's the only question that matters and the opinions of the stockholders are the only ones that matter.

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published