Marriott Bonvoy Isn’t Cutting Points Earning Rates… I’m Confused

Let me start by saying that at least for now, there’s nothing to panic about, and this was apparently a website error. However, several readers have brought this to my attention, so I can’t help but cover it. As a fairly low tech guy, I also have some questions to ask those who are more technologically literate.

Marriott Bonvoy’s strange points website error

For a brief period today, the Marriott website was updated to indicate significantly reduced points earning rates at many limited service brands.

Officially (and in line with terms & conditions), Bonvoy members earn 10 points per dollar spent at a vast majority of brands, with only a small number of limited service brands earning five points per dollar spent.

Marriott Bonvoy’s current official points earning rates

However, Marriott’s website was updated today to indicate that travelers would earn just five points per dollar spent for stays at a lot more brands. This suggested that most limited service brands would have their points earning rates slashed in half, including at Aloft, Courtyard, Four Points, Moxy, and more.

Marriott Bonvoy’s temporarily displayed points earning rates

Obviously slashing points earning rates by 50% would be terrible for many members, especially with the program continuing to increase award redemption rates at many properties, given dynamic award pricing.

Marriott quickly fixed its website, claiming this was an error. I reached out to a Marriott spokesperson to ask whether the error was the information as such, or just the timing with which the information was published.

The spokesperson has told me that this is “not indicative of any future changes.” That’s reassuring, because if this were actually a planned change, I’d expect the response to be “no comment” or non-answer, rather than a resounding denial of this being a planned change.

How do these kinds of IT glitches happen, though?

This brings me to my question. I’ve been covering the loyalty program space for a very long time. I can’t count the number of times that we’ve seen airline, hotel, and credit card websites display information prematurely, only to then be taken down, with the claim it was an error. In my experience, in a majority of situations, the error is the timing as such, rather than the information.

So this is where I’m coming to you, dear readers, to learn. Like I said, I’m a low tech guy — I can peck away at a keyboard pretty efficiently, but that’s about it. Based on my understanding, websites don’t have significant, unintended updates to text for absolutely no reason.

I’d assume that generally speaking, changes like the above happen for one of a few reasons:

  • The company is planning the change, but accidentally published the information prematurely; this is the most common explanation, in my experience
  • The company may have been considering the change at some point, but ended up deciding against it; I’m not sure how common this is, though?
  • Someone is playing a prank; this hardly seems like the type of prank someone would play, though

It’s one thing if the update to the website were totally nonsensical, like St. Regis showing reduced points earning, while Residence Inn shows increased points earning, where you assume it’s a formatting error, or something.

However, this change wouldn’t really shock anyone, I’d think:

  • If Marriott Bonvoy is going to reduce points earnings rates, I’d expect it to be in exactly the way that it was briefly published on the website
  • The information that was briefly published wasn’t outdated in any sort of obvious way; it even listed MGM Rewards, so this is not something that might’ve been considered years ago, but wasn’t followed through on
  • Heck, just a few months ago, Marriott’s CEO went on record as saying that it feels like the “right time to look across the enterprise and figure out what adjustments we can make to enhance and improve our efficiency,” and this seems like one of the ways that could be done

So to those who have a better understanding of how big companies handle their IT, could anyone provide some insights into how a website change like this could happen, aside from my theories above?

Bottom line

Marriott’s website was briefly updated today to indicate a reduction in points earning rates at many brands. A spokesperson has confirmed that this was a website error, and isn’t indicative of any future changes. That’s great news.

However, I can’t help but wonder how updates like this happen. In my experience, more often than not the error is the timing of the update being published, rather than the update as such. However, that’s apparently not the case here.

What do you make of this Marriott Bonvoy “website error?”

Conversations (32)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Rob Guest

As an IT guy who did work at Starwood, I believe they created this page intentionally so make new brands categorized as such. It can’t be an error to create that page. It might be an error of timing or it might be a decision to walk it back (at least for now) due to perceived or real backlash.

1
‼ 0
Tom Harris Guest

Highly suspect. Hopefully reports like this can walk them back from what appears to be a likely plan for a future date. Things such as this don't just happen and their denial is not surprising, companies, the government, etc. lie all the time.

0
‼ 0
Rupert Guest

This kinda work has been my career and it's unlikely to be an error. A large corporation like Marriott should have some type of Content Management System & process to update their web site. This requires a request for changes from the business users, probably some review by other stake holders, changes, localization,....before approval to be put live... In short multiple steps, multiple people... If it hadn't gone through much of that process, it wouldn't have gotten to the IT/web guys to make the actual changes to the site... Marriott might still do it later as scheduled or push it back/change/cancel based on the reaction to this leak... but I'd call BS on "not indicative of future changes" If this was indeed an error, Marriott's IT is a lot worse than I thought... and I didn't have a very high opinion of it as it was...

2
‼ 0
beng huat Guest

I would like to share that in event where you are redeeming and paying for a stay and they are overlapping stays for some valid reasons like mine. I have too many points and can afford to use it for a hotel nearer to where my meetings are held in the day and pay for a higher value room with great dining and views for the nite. BUT Marriott would ONLY credit the nites and meagre points for the redemption nites and NIL for the paid nites until you are able to prove that you stayed in the paid nites. So you have no say over how you use your redemption points. And in overlapping stays instead of crediting points and nites for the paid stay they wud do it for the redemption nites until you discover and prove otherwise. So in event where you want to use your hard earned redemption points make sure there are NO overlapping with paid nites. Or a better option wud be to use the redemption points at Marriott and go to any other hotels for paid nites. And you can forget about trying to reason or show prove cos the response is rather standard and insincere. Chat gpt can generate a more personal and sincere response.

0
‼ 0
Anthony Guest

Marriott CEO is having quite a few glitches. A year ago in February Marriott did not roll over Marriott Elite members who had airline status with United. Despite members showing up at he airport, being surprised with no status and had to pay for their luggage (without the rollover), Marriott admitting to the Tech Glitch in their system, Marriott CEO Anthony Capuano decided not to reimburse those Marriott Elite members. So much for Lifetime Titanium members. Now he promised Wall Street, $100 million in savings after an earnings call. People come people go. As once famous NFL football coach Jerry Glanville told the ref, if you make calls like that, NFL means Not for Long for the coach, or perhaps even a CEO.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published