Cathay Pacific Permanently Cuts Three US Routes

The pandemic is causing many airlines to rethink their strategies when it comes to network planning, fleet decisions, and more. Cathay Pacific is the latest airline to make permanent cuts to its route network, as it has revealed plans to eliminate seven routes.

Cathay Pacific eliminating seven routes

Danny Lee of the South China Morning Post quotes an internal Cathay Pacific memo, which confirms that Cathay Pacific will be eliminating seven long haul routes permanently. This includes flights from Hong Kong to:

  • Brussels, Belgium
  • Dublin, Ireland
  • London Gatwick, United Kingdom
  • Male, Maldives
  • Newark, United States
  • Seattle, United States
  • Washington Dulles, United States

The routes that Cathay Pacific is cutting

The claim is that all of these routes had been losing money even before the pandemic. A few thoughts on these routes:

  • In the cases of London Gatwick and Newark, Cathay Pacific continues to operate to other major airports in the markets (London Heathrow and New York JFK), so I guess the attempt to cater to other parts of those markets just didn’t work out
  • Brussels and Dublin were only recent additions to Cathay Pacific’s route network, as the airline launched those routes in 2018
  • Cathay Pacific launched Washington Dulles flights in 2018, and launched Seattle flights in 2019; on the surface Seattle seems like it would be more successful than Washington, but Seattle has also seen so much new transpacific service in recent years
  • I’m a bit surprised the Maldives is being cut, since it’s not a very long flight, the destination is open to people from around the world, and if we’re expecting leisure travel to recover first, it seems like this route could do better than most

Cathay Pacific has permanently cut flights to seven destinations

What are “permanent” cuts at this point, anyway?

I think one logical question is what it even means for a route cut to be permanent.

Cathay Pacific is operating a very limited schedule at the moment, and plans to operate a quarter of its pre-pandemic schedule in the first half of 2021. So how should we interpret that these route cuts are permanent? Does that mean they’re never coming back?

The way I view this:

  • As Cathay Pacific starts to rebuild its network, I wouldn’t expect these routes to be among those added back
  • If & when things fully recover (probably years down the road), we could see the airline give some of these routes a try once again
  • It’s worth keeping in mind that most of these routes were added when Rupert Hogg was CEO, and under his leadership we saw the airline be the most adventurous when it comes to route planning; I wouldn’t expect the same principle to apply under current leadership

So yeah, don’t expect the above seven routes to return in the next few years. Maybe they’ll return further down the line, maybe not. Only time will tell.

These routes could return in the future, but not anytime soon

Bottom line

Cathay Pacific has revealed internally that it will discontinue seven routes permanently, including three to the US (Newark, Seattle, and Washington), three to Europe (Brussels, Dublin, and London Gatwick), and one to the Maldives.

It’s possible that these routes will be reinstated at some point in the future, but don’t expect them to be added back as the airline slowly rebuilds its network.

Personally I’m not surprised by most of these cuts — perhaps the Maldives elimination is the most interesting one to me.

Obviously the Maldives isn’t a high yield destination for airlines (since there’s little business travel), but you’d think it would be a destination that works better than most at this point. Perhaps the real issue is that those who would usually fly Cathay Pacific to the Maldives are currently in countries that are mostly locked down, like Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, etc.

What do you make of Cathay Pacific’s route cuts?

Conversations (43)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Ryan Guest

I was honestly shocked and disappointed to hear about Cathay's route cuts, although I can understand where they're coming from. However, it's hard to believe that this is a permanent thing, and not something temporary where it would resume in the foreseeable future. What really hurt the most was the fact that CX is cutting EWR from its network. I always thought the route was profitable given the proximity to Midtown Manhattan, along with expanding service in NYC.

0
‼ 0
Ninja Guest

@experienced traveller Lol turn off CCTV. The majority of Hongkongers know 1 country 2 systems is a sham.

0
‼ 0
whzzz New Member

@ Experienced Traveller Agreed I can't imagine a lot of Asian travellers would want to go to the Maldives when they could visit Phuket or Bali for a fraction of the cost I think it's a bit naive to say commercial decisions of CX have no relation to China exerting more pressure... considering the CCP directly threatened for allowing staff to join protests

0
‼ 0
Experienced Traveller Gold

@Marco- Not sure where you live but many Hong Kongers would totally disagree with you . Hong Kong is still under one country -two systems and commercial decisions by CX have no relation to China exerting more pressure on Hong Kong in political and other matters .

0
‼ 0
Experienced Traveller Gold

@ Jason. Maldives is definitely a destination for wealthy tourists . Rather expensive and not for the average tourist from Asia. They have some many other low cost places on their doorstep like China , Vietnam ,Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published