Southwest Removes “Disabled” Man From Flight Over ADA Carry-On Dispute

A man who claims to have a disability was removed from a Southwest Airlines flight after he insisted he couldn’t store his personal item underneath his seat due to a medical need. While it’s of course important to adhere to ADA policies, I find some of the details here to be a bit confusing.

Man kicked off Southwest flight over carry-on dispute

A musician named Cody Blackbird took to Instagram to share an incident that happened yesterday (Thursday, August 6, 2026) on a Southwest flight from Dallas (DAL) to Tulsa (TUL). To summarize this situation as simply as possible:

  • The man was traveling with an instrument and a backpack, and he tried to place both items in the overhead bin
  • When the crew noticed he placed both items in the overhead, they asked him to place one item underneath the seat in front, but he claimed he couldn’t do that, due to a disability-related medical need that he wasn’t comfortable talking about, and he kept claiming that ADA and FAA regulations were on his side
  • Eventually the crew kicked him off the flight due to lack of compliance, and because they weren’t comfortable with him
  • A supervisor ended up meeting him after the flight and rebooking him on the next flight, and the supervisor seemed to largely take his side

You can watch the video for yourself below.

Here’s the caption about the video, with everything in his own words:

Today I was removed from a Southwest Airlines flight after requesting a disability accommodation.

When I boarded, I placed both my carry-on and backpack in the overhead bin because I need the space under the seat in front of me due to a disability-related medical need. When a flight attendant asked me to move my backpack under the seat, I explained that I have a disability and need that space for proper blood flow. I also told the crew I wasn’t comfortable discussing my private medical information in front of a full plane.

Initially, they acknowledged my request.

Moments before takeoff, however, I was deplaned for allegedly “not following crew member instructions.”

Afterward, a Southwest supervisor spoke with the crew and returned to tell me that I should never have been deplaned and that I should never have been asked to place my backpack under the seat because ADA supersedes airline policy for able bodied customers

Despite that, I missed my original flight and was delayed by five hours.

I’m sharing this because no one should have to choose between protecting their health, their privacy, and being able to travel. Disability accommodations exist for a reason, and I hope sharing my experience helps bring awareness to how situations like this should be handled with dignity and respect.

Does a disability really cover something like this?

So of course it’s crucially important for airlines to follow ADA regulations, and make accommodations for disabled passengers. Passengers also generally aren’t required to reveal the details of their disability.

But to me it raises the question, do ADA regulations really cover something like this? I’m not here to speculate about what his condition is, but presumably it has something to do with needing a certain amount of space in front of him? If so, would a seat with limited pitch also violate ADA regulations, as he sees it? I guess I’m struggling to figure out what exactly the legally required accommodation here is.

The reason I’m not sure if this would be covered by ADA regulations is because it’s not clear (at least he didn’t share) why he needed to actually carry on that bag. It seems like if he has a situation where he can’t have anything by his feet, and if airline regulations require the second carry-on item to be stored underneath the seat, then maybe he needed to check a bag instead?

I get that maybe he didn’t want to check the items that were in the bag, but still, this doesn’t seem like a standard accommodation that you would expect on account of the ADA.

Obviously there are lots of people with “invisible” disabilities, and those shouldn’t be diminished. But at airports you also have all kinds of people who take advantage of any loophole that they can, as we often see with wheelchairs. I’m not saying that’s the case here, but I can understand the general skepticism with “I can’t follow your rules due to an undisclosed medical condition.”

At the same time, it also seems like the crew could’ve just deescalated this, because this all ended up being much more drama than it needed to be. And I bet on his next flight, he was allowed to store both items in the overhead bin.

A man was kicked off a Southwest flight over his carry-on situation

Bottom line

A man was removed from a Southwest Airlines flight after he insisted that he could store both of his carry-on items in the overhead bin due to a medical condition. While the ADA does set the standard for the ways that airlines have to accommodate customers with disabilities, it’s not clear to me that this is actually explicitly covered.

What do you make of this Southwest ADA situation?

Conversations (59)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Ghost Rat Guest

I get the skepticism and all, and I would expect the man to be clear about why a specific accommodation is pertenant to his disabilty- does he need the space at his feet, is it too distressing having that space taken up? Except. Massive, MASSIVE caveat here. Who is he hurting? It's not like he's placing them in the isle, where it presents a hazard, or on the seat next to him, taking up someone else's seat- he's actually putting them out of the way of others. The only reason to confront and evict someone from a plane is if they are making the flight dangerous. You can judge all you want, I have invisible disabilities that need accommodating in ways that can make others upset with me, and I judge others- even if they have the same disabilities as me. I know they do it, too. But most people know to hold their tongue and go about their day- and to not unnecessarily sabotage.

0
‼ 0
Capo Guest

It is time to end the free for all ADA, service dog, etc. loophole. The same way that a placard is needed for parking in disabled spaces people need to have some documentation issued by state, county or city that certify their status. I’m tired of jetway jesus.

0
‼ 0
dee Guest

He sounds like a fruit loop for sure. I applaud the FA for even noticing he put 2 things in the overhead bin!! People do this all of the time and noone bothers to say anything

0
‼ 0
JamesW Guest

The ADA doesn't apply to interstate air travel. That's the Air Carrier Access Act, an entirely different law. Even if this fool and his "private medical condition" doesn't know that, I'm surprised Ben doesn't. I'm surprised the "Southwest Airlines supervisor" doesn't. Agree with others that this kind of tacky clickbait doesn't belong on OMAAT. It's something Gary would post - after overhearing it in the breakfast buffet line.

0
‼ 0
Ken Guest

I was on that flight and witnessed this first hand. Passenger was in a seat toward the front of the plane with extra leg room already, plane was full, limited bin space, smaller bins than one of the bigger planes. Bags were already being checked. Passenger was asked to stow small backpack under seat. Passenger refused and made a scene. Others, including myself were uncomfortable. Passenger was removed and I never once heard anyone ask for his medical condition. This is a lot of misinformation and I feel for the staff having to deal with this man’s nonsense.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published